oft-repeated rule (Arkansas) · Go Syfert
← Arkansas issues

oft-repeated rule in Arkansas

6 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 1921–2006 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (8)

CaseCitedYears
Welsh v. Wisconsin green
scotus · 1984
2 sentences

2006Welsh v. Wisconsin, 466 U.S. 740 (1984).

2006Welsh v. Wisconsin, 466 U.S. 740 , 104 S.Ct. 2091 , 80 L.Ed.2d 732 (1984).

22002–2006
Chrisco v. Sun Industries, Inc. green
ark · 1990
2 sentences

2004Chrisco v. Sun Indus., 304 Ark. 227 , 800 S.W.2d 717 (1990).

2004Chrisco v. Sun Indus., 304 Ark. 227 , 800 S.W.2d 717 (1990).

12004–2004
Jones v. State green
ark · 1980
2 sentences

2002While his argument is not entirely clear, he seems to assert that this Court erroneously concluded in Jones v. State, 269 Ark. 119 , 598 S.W.2d 748 (1980), that the substantial-evidence standard is consistent with the “rational fact-finder” standard enunciated in Jackson, and that his case, if affirmed on the allegedly scant evidence in the record, illustrates that the substantial-evidence standard does not adequately insure that the jury found he was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

2002While his argument is not entirely clear, he seems to assert that this Court erroneously concluded in Jones v. State, 269 Ark. 119 , 598 S.W.2d 748 (1980), that the substantial-evidence standard is consistent with the “rational fact-finder” standard enunciated in Jackson, and that his case, if affirmed on the allegedly scant evidence in the record, illustrates that the substantial-evidence standard does not adequately insure that the jury found he was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

12002–2002
Butler v. State green
ark · 1992
2 sentences

2002Welsh v. Wisconsin, 466 U.S. 740 (1984); McFerrin v. State, 344 Ark. 671 , 42 S.W.3d 529 (2001); Butler v. State, 309 Ark. 211 , 829 S.W.2d 412 (1992).

2002Welsh v. Wisconsin, 466 U.S. 740 (1984); McFerrin v. State, 344 Ark. 671 , 42 S.W.3d 529 (2001); Butler v. State, 309 Ark. 211 , 829 S.W.2d 412 (1992).

12002–2002
McFerrin v. State green
ark · 2001
2 sentences

2002Welsh v. Wisconsin, 466 U.S. 740 (1984); McFerrin v. State, 344 Ark. 671 , 42 S.W.3d 529 (2001); Butler v. State, 309 Ark. 211 , 829 S.W.2d 412 (1992).

2002Welsh v. Wisconsin, 466 U.S. 740 (1984); McFerrin v. State, 344 Ark. 671 , 42 S.W.3d 529 (2001); Butler v. State, 309 Ark. 211 , 829 S.W.2d 412 (1992).

12002–2002
Jackson v. Virginia red
scotus · 1979
1 sentence

2002Constitutionality of Substantial-Evidence Standard of Review The appellant next appears to contend that the oft-repeated standard of appellate review for sufficiency of the evidence, the substantial-evidence standard, is unconstitutional under fackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979).

12002–2002
Medalist Forming Systems, Inc. v. Malvern National Bank green
ark · 1992
2 sentences

1993Medalist Forming Systems, Inc. v. Malvern National Bank, 309 Ark. 561 , 832 S.W.2d 228 (1992).

1993Medalist Forming Systems, Inc. v. Malvern National Bank, 309 Ark. 561 , 832 S.W.2d 228 (1992).

11993–1993
Hardin v. State green
ark · 1898
1 sentence

1921Polk v. State, 45 Ark. 170 ; Hardin v. State, 66 Ark. 53 ; McGough v. State, 113 Ark. 304 .

11921–1921

Where else courts name it

WV 142 (1939–2026) PA 30 (1905–2024) WY 27 (1974–2012) IL 21 (1936–2013) CA 21 (1935–2023) OK 19 (1913–1975) KS 18 (1905–2009) MO 14 (1915–2025) MT 12 (1925–1996) AL 10 (1917–2009) FL 9 (1929–2019) GA 8 (1923–2023) OR 8 (1920–2011) NM 8 (1940–2012) MI 8 (1970–2020) TX 7 (1937–2025) WI 7 (1928–2023) MN 7 (1943–2001) IA 7 (1896–2015) MD 7 (1970–2016) WA 7 (1942–1981) AR 6 (1921–2006) AZ 6 (1952–1984) DC 5 (1951–2016) NY 5 (1947–2015) IN 5 (1908–1984) CT 4 (1962–2000) UT 4 (1964–2024) NE 4 (1910–1991) ID 4 (1915–1969) NC 4 (1897–1986) OH 4 (1929–2017) TN 4 (1973–1983) KY 4 (1929–2026) CO 3 (1949–1975) LA 3 (1960–1969) DE 2 (2020–2021) NJ 2 (1954–1994) SC 2 (1953–1966) MP 2 (1989–1996)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check