Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 1995–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Kinggreen2 sentences2019See, e.g., State v. King, 249 Conn. 645 , 664–67, 735 A.2d 267 (1999). 2019I WHETHER FEAR OR DISTRUST OF LAW ENFORCEMENT IS A RACE NEUTRAL REASON FOR A PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE UNDER BATSON On appeal, the defendant urges us to modify or over- rule State v. King, supra, 249 Conn. 645 , and hold that fear or distrust of law enforcement is not a race neutral reason for the use of a peremptory challenge ‘‘[b]ecause it is most commonly minority races that possess such a fear . . . .’’ The defendant emphasizes that W.T.’s ‘‘general concerns for his safety and equality as an Afri- can-American,’’ on which the prosecutor relied as a race neutral explanation, are neither ‘‘unique | 1 | 1 |
State v. Hodgegreen2 sentences2017See also State v. Hodge , 248 Conn. 207 , 231, 726 A.2d 531 (resentment or distrust of police and prosecuting authorities legitimate and race neutral bases for use of peremptory challenge), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 969 , 120 S.Ct. 409 , 145 L.Ed.2d 319 (1999) ; United States v. Arnold , 835 F.3d 833 , 842 (8th Cir. 2016) ("dissatisfaction with law enforcement by itself was a legitimate reason for the government to strike ... two jurors"). 2017See also State v. Hodge , 248 Conn. 207 , 231, 726 A.2d 531 (resentment or distrust of police and prosecuting authorities legitimate and race neutral bases for use of peremptory challenge), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 969 , 120 S.Ct. 409 , 145 L.Ed.2d 319 (1999) ; United States v. Arnold , 835 F.3d 833 , 842 (8th Cir. 2016) ("dissatisfaction with law enforcement by itself was a legitimate reason for the government to strike ... two jurors"). | 1 | 1 |
Turner v. Mississippigreen2 sentences2017See also State v. Hodge, 248 Conn. 207, 231 , 726 A.2d 531 (resentment or distrust of police and prosecuting authorities legitimate and race neutral bases for use of peremptory challenge), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 969 , 120 S. Ct. 409 , 145 L. 2017See also State v. Hodge , 248 Conn. 207 , 231, 726 A.2d 531 (resentment or distrust of police and prosecuting authorities legitimate and race neutral bases for use of peremptory challenge), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 969 , 120 S.Ct. 409 , 145 L.Ed.2d 319 (1999) ; United States v. Arnold , 835 F.3d 833 , 842 (8th Cir. 2016) ("dissatisfaction with law enforcement by itself was a legitimate reason for the government to strike ... two jurors"). | 1 | 1 |
Mayabb v. Johnsongreen2 sentences2017See also State v. Hodge, 248 Conn. 207, 231 , 726 A.2d 531 (resentment or distrust of police and prosecuting authorities legitimate and race neutral bases for use of peremptory challenge), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 969 , 120 S. Ct. 409 , 145 L. 2017See also State v. Hodge , 248 Conn. 207 , 231, 726 A.2d 531 (resentment or distrust of police and prosecuting authorities legitimate and race neutral bases for use of peremptory challenge), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 969 , 120 S.Ct. 409 , 145 L.Ed.2d 319 (1999) ; United States v. Arnold , 835 F.3d 833 , 842 (8th Cir. 2016) ("dissatisfaction with law enforcement by itself was a legitimate reason for the government to strike ... two jurors"). | 1 | 1 |
Neilson v. Michigangreen2 sentences2017See also State v. Hodge, 248 Conn. 207, 231 , 726 A.2d 531 (resentment or distrust of police and prosecuting authorities legitimate and race neutral bases for use of peremptory challenge), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 969 , 120 S. Ct. 409 , 145 L. 2017See also State v. Hodge , 248 Conn. 207 , 231, 726 A.2d 531 (resentment or distrust of police and prosecuting authorities legitimate and race neutral bases for use of peremptory challenge), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 969 , 120 S.Ct. 409 , 145 L.Ed.2d 319 (1999) ; United States v. Arnold , 835 F.3d 833 , 842 (8th Cir. 2016) ("dissatisfaction with law enforcement by itself was a legitimate reason for the government to strike ... two jurors"). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Cameron Arnoldgreen1 sentence2017See also State v. Hodge , 248 Conn. 207 , 231, 726 A.2d 531 (resentment or distrust of police and prosecuting authorities legitimate and race neutral bases for use of peremptory challenge), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 969 , 120 S.Ct. 409 , 145 L.Ed.2d 319 (1999) ; United States v. Arnold , 835 F.3d 833 , 842 (8th Cir. 2016) ("dissatisfaction with law enforcement by itself was a legitimate reason for the government to strike ... two jurors"). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Batson v. Kentucky
green
2 sentences2016Indeed, the new rule that was at issue in Griffith was the rule set forth in Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 , 97, 106 S.Ct. 1712 , 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), requiring a prosecutor to provide a neutral explanation for the use of a peremptory challenge to strike a member of the defendant's race from the jury venire, reasonably could be characterized as a prophylactic rule. 2016Indeed, the new rule that was at issue in Griffith was the rule set forth in Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 , 97, 106 S.Ct. 1712 , 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), requiring a prosecutor to provide a neutral explanation for the use of a peremptory challenge to strike a member of the defendant's race from the jury venire, reasonably could be characterized as a prophylactic rule. | 4 | 1995–2016 |
State v. Hinton
green
2 sentences2017In State v. Hinton , 227 Conn. 301 , 327, 630 A.2d 593 (1993), the court similarly upheld the use of a peremptory challenge to a potential juror who expressed distrust of the judicial system's treatment of minority defendants. 2017In State v. Hinton , 227 Conn. 301 , 327, 630 A.2d 593 (1993), the court similarly upheld the use of a peremptory challenge to a potential juror who expressed distrust of the judicial system's treatment of minority defendants. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Holloway
green
2 sentences1995Batson v. Kentucky, supra, 476 U.S. 79 ; 14 see also State v. Patterson, supra, 230 Conn. 385 ; State v. Holloway, supra, 209 Conn. 636 . 1995Also, it is not clear in the event of either of these situations, whether the abrogation of the first prong of Batson as provided in State v. Holloway, supra, 209 Conn. 636 , would retain its applicability. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
State v. Patterson
green
1 sentence1995Batson v. Kentucky, supra, 476 U.S. 79 ; 14 see also State v. Patterson, supra, 230 Conn. 385 ; State v. Holloway, supra, 209 Conn. 636 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.