6 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 2008–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Morrissey v. Brewergreen2 sentences2025Accordingly, the termination of a parolee’s liberty interest requires “an informal hearing structured to assure that the finding of a parole violation will be based on verified facts and that the exercise of discretion will be informed by an accurate knowledge of the parolee’s behavior.” Id. at 484 . 2025Accordingly, the termination of a parolee’s liberty interest requires “an informal hearing structured to assure that the finding of a parole violation will be based on verified facts and that the exercise of discretion will be informed by an accurate knowledge of the parolee’s behavior.” Id. at 484 . | 1 | 6 |
State v. Rogersgreen2 sentences2022See Morrissey, 408 U.S. at 484 (discussing the informal hearing structure of state parole hearings); State v. Rogers, 144 Idaho 738, 742 , 170 P.3d 881, 885 (2007) (observing that the United States Supreme Court has held that, when revoking probation, the State must provide the same process as in the revocation of parole). 2022See Morrissey, 408 U.S. at 484 (discussing the informal hearing structure of state parole hearings); State v. Rogers, 144 Idaho 738, 742 , 170 P.3d 881, 885 (2007) (observing that the United States Supreme Court has held that, when revoking probation, the State must provide the same process as in the revocation of parole). | 1 | 1 |
State, Bureau of Child Support Services v. Garciagreen2 sentences2022Although procedural rules are subordinate to the dictates of due process, see State, Bureau of Child Support Servs. v. Garcia, 132 Idaho 505, 511 , 975 P.2d 793, 799 (Ct. App. 1999), compliance with Idaho’s court rules generally will provide litigants with due process. 2022Although procedural rules are subordinate to the dictates of due process, see State, Bureau of Child Support Servs. v. Garcia, 132 Idaho 505, 511 , 975 P.2d 793, 799 (Ct. App. 1999), compliance with Idaho’s court rules generally will provide litigants with due process. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Prelwitzgreen2 sentences2011However, in State v. Prelwitz, 132 Idaho 191, 193 , 968 P.2d 1100, 1102 (Ct. App. 1998), this Court specifically applied the fundamental error doctrine to a probation revocation proceeding. 6 What is needed is an informal hearing structured to assure that the finding of a parole violation will be based on verified facts and that the exercise of discretion will be informed by an accurate knowledge of the parolee’s behavior. 2011However, in State v. Prelwitz, 132 Idaho 191, 193 , 968 P.2d 1100, 1102 (Ct. App. 1998), this Court specifically applied the fundamental error doctrine to a probation revocation proceeding. 6 What is needed is an informal hearing structured to assure that the finding of a parole violation will be based on verified facts and that the exercise of discretion will be informed by an accurate knowledge of the parolee’s behavior. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Egersdorf
green
2 sentences2011Egersdorf, 126 Idaho at 686 , 889 P.2d at 120 (quoting Morrissey, 408 U.S. at 484 ) (emphasis added). 2011Egersdorf, 126 Idaho at 686 , 889 P.2d at 120 (quoting Morrissey, 408 U.S. at 484 ) (emphasis added). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Mattoon v. Blades
green
2 sentences2011Morrissey, 408 U.S. at 484 ; Mattoon, 145 Idaho at 637 , 181 P.3d at 1245 . 2011Morrissey, 408 U.S. at 484 ; Mattoon, 145 Idaho at 637 , 181 P.3d at 1245 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.