informal hearing (Maryland) · Go Syfert
← Maryland issues

informal hearing in Maryland

11 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2022 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

CaseFollowedCited
Rios v. Town of Huntington Housing Authoritygreen
nyed · 2012 · cited in 2 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019
2 sentences

2019Auth. , 853 F.Supp.2d 330 , 344 (E.D.N.Y. 2012) ("[D]istrict courts in this circuit as well as outside of this circuit have previously held that termination of housing benefits does not violate due process when the informal hearing is not recorded.").

2019Auth., 853 F. Supp. 2d 330, 344 (E.D.N.Y. 2012) (“[D]istrict courts in this circuit as well as outside of this circuit have previously held that termination of housing benefits does not violate due process when the informal hearing is not recorded.”).

22
Goldberg v. Kellygreen
scotus · 1970 · cited in 3 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2011–2019
2 sentences

2019To review, although a decision need not "amount to a full opinion," Goldberg , 397 U.S. at 271 , 90 S.Ct. 1011 , at the very least, such decision should depend on reliable evidence presented at the informal hearing, respond to that evidence sufficiently, cite a legal basis for the actions taken, and do so in enough detail as not to be conclusory.

2019To review, although a decision need not "amount to a full opinion," Goldberg , 397 U.S. at 271 , 90 S.Ct. 1011 , at the very least, such decision should depend on reliable evidence presented at the informal hearing, respond to that evidence sufficiently, cite a legal basis for the actions taken, and do so in enough detail as not to be conclusory.

13
Elms v. Renewal by Andersongreen
md · 2014 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019
2 sentences

2019See Elms v. Renewal by Andersen , 439 Md. 381 , 391, 96 A.3d 175 (2014).

2019See Elms v. Renewal by Andersen , 439 Md. 381 , 391, 96 A.3d 175 (2014).

11
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Fabergreen
md · 2003 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
2 sentences

2014See Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Faber, 373 Md. 173, 179 , 817 A.2d 205, 208 (2003) (We held that the "[Qailure to present argument in support of an exception is a sufficient basis on which ... not [to] consider [the exception].” (Citation and internal quotation marks omitted)). 6 .

2014See Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Faber, 373 Md. 173, 179 , 817 A.2d 205, 208 (2003) (We held that the "[Qailure to present argument in support of an exception is a sufficient basis on which ... not [to] consider [the exception].” (Citation and internal quotation marks omitted)). 6 .

11
Langston v. Riffegreen
md · 2000 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
2 sentences

2011This Court defined remedial statutes in Langston v. Riffe, 359 Md. 396, 408-09 , 754 A.2d 389, 395-96 (2000): Generally, remedial statutes are those which provide a remedy, or improve or facilitate remedies already existing for the enforcement of rights and the redress of injuries.

2011This Court defined remedial statutes in Langston v. Riffe, 359 Md. 396, 408-09 , 754 A.2d 389, 395-96 (2000): Generally, remedial statutes are those which provide a remedy, or improve or facilitate remedies already existing for the enforcement of rights and the redress of injuries.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
Bankers & Shippers Insurance v. Electro Enterprises Inc. green
md · 1980
2 sentences

2000In Bankers, 287 Md. at 661-62 , 415 A.2d 278 , the Court commented that the informal hearing conducted by the trial court neither required any real proof of the amount of the fees and expenses claimed nor provided [the petitioner] with a realistic opportunity to challenge those fees and ex-penses____ Instead, the parties merely submitted, prior to the hearing, informal fee and expense petitions and made short, oral representations at the hearing of the amounts *625 claimed.

2000In Bankers, 287 Md. at 661-62 , 415 A.2d 278 , the Court commented that the informal hearing conducted by the trial court neither required any real proof of the amount of the fees and expenses claimed nor provided [the petitioner] with a realistic opportunity to challenge those fees and ex-penses____ Instead, the parties merely submitted, prior to the hearing, informal fee and expense petitions and made short, oral representations at the hearing of the amounts *625 claimed.

31997–2006
Walker v. Department of Housing & Community Development green
md · 2011
2 sentences

2019Also relevant to the current case, we said that "the informal hearing framework set forth in [the HUD regulations] meets Goldberg's due process requirements." Id. at 94 , 29 A.3d 293 .

2019Also relevant to the current case, we said that "the informal hearing framework set forth in [the HUD regulations] meets Goldberg's due process requirements." Id. at 94 , 29 A.3d 293 .

22019–2019
Driver v. Housing Authority of Racine County green
wisctapp · 2006
2 sentences

2019In Driver , 713 N.W.2d at 677 , the Wisconsin Court of Appeals determined that an informal hearing decision was conclusory and a violation of the plaintiff's due process rights.

2019In Driver, 713 N.W.2d at 677 , the Wisconsin Court of Appeals determined that an informal hearing decision was conclusory and a violation of the plaintiff’s due process rights.

22019–2019
Maxima Corp. v. 6933 Arlington Development Ltd. Partnership green
mdctspecapp · 1994
2 sentences

2000On remand, there should be a proper trial regarding the damages incurred____ In Maxima, 100 Md.App. at 453-54 , 641 A.2d 977 , after quoting the above language from Bankers, we went on to discuss the quality and amount of information that a claimant is required to provide.

2000On remand, there should be a proper trial regarding the damages incurred____ In Maxima, 100 Md.App. at 453-54 , 641 A.2d 977 , after quoting the above language from Bankers, we went on to discuss the quality and amount of information that a claimant is required to provide.

21997–2000
Willis v. Montgomery County green
md · 2010
2 sentences

2022Rather than “leav[ing] nothing further for the administrative body to decide,” Willis, 415 Md. at 535 , 3 A.3d at 455–56, regarding whether to adopt the minor amendment, CR-72-2019 initiated the process for deciding whether to adopt the minor amendment.

2022Rather than “leav[ing] nothing further for the administrative body to decide,” Willis, 415 Md. at 535 , 3 A.3d at 455–56, regarding whether to adopt the minor amendment, CR-72-2019 initiated the process for deciding whether to adopt the minor amendment.

12022–2022
Commercial Union Insurance v. Porter Hayden Co. green
mdctspecapp · 1997
2 sentences

1999Co. v. Porter Hayden Co., 116 Md.App. 605, 703 , 698 A.2d 1167 , cert. denied, 348 Md. 205 , 703 A.2d 147 (1997): “[W]hen claims for attorneys’ fees and expenses are ... claimed as damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff must satisfy the standards spelled out” in Bankers and Maxima Corp. The Court in Bankers explained: It is equally clear from the record, however, that the informal hearing conducted by the trial court neither required any real proof of the amount of the fees and expenses claimed nor provided Bankers with a realistic opportunity to challenge those fees and expenses.

1999Co. v. Porter Hayden Co., 116 Md.App. 605, 703 , 698 A.2d 1167 , cert. denied, 348 Md. 205 , 703 A.2d 147 (1997): “[W]hen claims for attorneys’ fees and expenses are ... claimed as damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff must satisfy the standards spelled out” in Bankers and Maxima Corp. The Court in Bankers explained: It is equally clear from the record, however, that the informal hearing conducted by the trial court neither required any real proof of the amount of the fees and expenses claimed nor provided Bankers with a realistic opportunity to challenge those fees and expenses.

11999–1999
In Re Polin green
dc · 1991
2 sentences

1997The State Board of Law Examiners decided that a formal hearing on the record on his fitness to practice law was unnecessary and instead conducted an informal hearing. 2 Cf. In re Polin, 596 A.2d 50 , 55 n. 7 (D.C.1991) (noting that when applicant has committed a felony or other serious crime, committee should conduct an independent investigation into applicant’s behavior).

1997The State Board of Law Examiners decided that a formal hearing on the record on his fitness to practice law was unnecessary and instead conducted an informal hearing. [2] Cf. In re Polin, 596 A.2d 50 , 55 n. 7 (D.C.1991) (noting that when applicant has committed a felony or other serious crime, committee should conduct an independent investigation into applicant's behavior).

11997–1997

Statutes the citing opinions construe

CFR § 24c.f.r.982.551 (3) CFR § 24c.f.r.982.552 (3) CFR § 24c.f.r.982.555 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TX 252 (1966–2026) CA 94 (1949–2025) NY 37 (1923–2025) PA 34 (1956–2024) FL 34 (1952–2026) OH 33 (1949–2026) IL 20 (1961–2025) NJ 17 (1975–2023) ND 14 (1979–2023) WA 13 (1977–2017) IA 11 (1980–2017) MD 11 (1997–2022) NM 11 (1988–2019) VA 9 (1992–2019) AZ 9 (1956–1994) UT 9 (1989–2026) WY 9 (1987–2022) IN 8 (1991–2025) WI 8 (1978–2010) NE 8 (1954–2026) CT 8 (1996–2025) MI 7 (1926–2024) KY 7 (1991–2024) DC 7 (1976–2019) LA 7 (1983–2019) MT 6 (1978–2025) ID 6 (2008–2025) MA 6 (1978–2014) GA 5 (1975–2019) MO 5 (1879–2012) MS 4 (1991–1999) OR 4 (1973–2022) HI 4 (1998–2019) RI 4 (1981–2018) AL 3 (1984–2004) OK 3 (1989–2003) CO 3 (1983–2020) ME 3 (1991–2022) TN 3 (1995–2004) MN 3 (1999–2012) NH 2 (1978–2011) NC 2 (2010–2010) WV 2 (2005–2012) SC 2 (2006–2008) AK 2 (1974–1977)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check