8 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 1991–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Morrissey v. Brewergreen2 sentences2013The rationale underlying the writing requirement in probation revocation proceedings has 4 its genesis in Morrissey where the United States Supreme Court concluded that while an informal hearing structure is permissible for parole revocation proceedings, it still must comport with basic notions of due process, including a written statement by the fact finders as to the evidence relied on and the reasons for revoking parole. 408 U.S. at 488 - 89 (emphasis added). 2013The rationale underlying the writing requirement in probation revocation proceedings has its genesis in Morrissey where the United States Supreme Court concluded that while an informal hearing structure is permissible for parole revocation proceedings, it still must comport with basic notions of due process, including 3 “a written statement by the fact finders as to the evidence relied on and reasons for revoking parole.” 408 U.S. at 489 (emphasis added). | 4 | 5 |
Gagnon v. Scarpellired2 sentences2013In Gagnon v. Scarpelli, the Supreme Court applied the Morrissey holding to probation revocation proceedings, holding that for purposes of due process analysis, the two proceedings are the same. 411 U.S. 778, 782 (1973). 2013In Gagnon v. Scarpelli, the United States Supreme Court applied the Morrissey holding to probation revocation proceedings, holding that for purposes of due process analysis, the two proceedings are the same. 411 U.S. 778, 782 (1973). | 3 | 3 |
ESPN, Inc. and Paula Lavigne v. University of Notre Dame Police Departmentgreen1 sentence2024See, e.g., ESPN, Inc. v. Univ. of Notre Dame Police Dep’t, 62 N.E.3d 1192 (Ind. 2016); Citizens Action Coal. of Ind. v. Koch, 51 N.E.3d 236 Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 23A-PL-705 | April 29, 2024 Page 4 of 23 C. | 1 | 1 |
Town of Merrillville v. Blancogreen1 sentence2004See also Town of Merrillville v. Blanco, 687 N.E.2d 191, 197 (Ind.Ct.App.1997) (noting that when making a determination on substantial compliance of the Open Door Law, "[sleveral factors are considered, including the extent to which the violation denied or impaired access to a meeting, and prevented or impaired public knowledge or understanding of the business conducted in the meeting"), reh'g denied, trams. denied. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bushong v. Williamson
green
1 sentence2025In fact, in Bushong, 790 N.E.2d at 474 , our Supreme Court held that the trial court properly granted summary judgment in favor of the employee regarding a scope of employment issue. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana, Energy Policy Institute, and Common Cause of Indiana v. Eric Koch, and Indiana House Republican Caucus
green
1 sentence2024See, e.g., ESPN, Inc. v. Univ. of Notre Dame Police Dep’t, 62 N.E.3d 1192 (Ind. 2016); Citizens Action Coal. of Ind. v. Koch, 51 N.E.3d 236 Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 23A-PL-705 | April 29, 2024 Page 4 of 23 C. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.