6 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1991–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Florida v. Jimenogreen2 sentences2015Id. at 251-52 , 111 S.Ct. at 1803-05 , 114 L.Ed.2d at 302-04 . 2015Id. at 251-52 , 111 S.Ct. at 1803-05 , 114 L.Ed.2d at 302-04 . | 1 | 2 |
Isaac Sparks v. Ronald Stutler and Manuel Largaespadagreen1 sentence2011“A catheter is more intrusive than a needle but less intrusive than a scalpel, making it hard to classify the procedure under an objective reasonableness inquiry.” Sparks v. Stutter, 71 F.3d 259, 261 (7th Cir. 1995). | 1 | 1 |
Graham v. Connorgreen2 sentences1991Graham’s application of an objective reasonableness standard furthers the essential purposes of the fourth amendment — guaranteeing that free citizens are ‘ “secure in their persons ... against unreasonable ... seizures” of the person.’ Graham, 109 S.Ct. at 1871 (emphasis added). 1991Graham's application of an objective reasonableness standard furthers the essential purposes of the fourth amendment guaranteeing that free citizens are `"secure in their persons ... against unreasonable ... seizures" of the person.' Graham, 109 S.Ct. at 1871 (emphasis added). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Kyle Nicholas Rios
green
1 sentence2025State v. Rios, 160 Idaho 262, 265 , 317 P.3d 316 , 319 (2016). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Burton v. United States
green
1 sentence2017Id. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.