6 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 2013–2023 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. KOIVUgreen2 sentences2023Evidence obtained in direct violation of either the Fourth Amendment or Article I, section 17 may not be used as evidence against the victim of the violation. 1 Segura v. United States, 468 U.S. 796, 804 (1984); State v. Koivu, 152 Idaho 511, 516 , 272 P.3d 483, 488 (2012); Bishop, 146 Idaho at 810–11, 203 P.3d at 1209–10. 2023Evidence obtained in direct violation of either the Fourth Amendment or Article I, section 17 may not be used as evidence against the victim of the violation. 1 Segura v. United States, 468 U.S. 796, 804 (1984); State v. Koivu, 152 Idaho 511, 516 , 272 P.3d 483, 488 (2012); Bishop, 146 Idaho at 810–11, 203 P.3d at 1209–10. | 2 | 2 |
Segura v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2023Evidence obtained in direct violation of either the Fourth Amendment or Article I, section 17 may not be used as evidence against the victim of the violation. 1 Segura v. United States, 468 U.S. 796, 804 (1984); State v. Koivu, 152 Idaho 511, 516 , 272 P.3d 483, 488 (2012); Bishop, 146 Idaho at 810–11, 203 P.3d at 1209–10. 2023Evidence obtained in direct violation of either the Fourth Amendment or Article I, section 17 may not be used as evidence against the victim of the violation. 1 Segura v. United States, 468 U.S. 796, 804 (1984); State v. Koivu, 152 Idaho 511, 516 , 272 P.3d 483, 488 (2012); Bishop, 146 Idaho at 810–11, 203 P.3d at 1209–10. | 2 | 2 |
State v. Hollandgreen2 sentences2023“When the defendant challenges the legality of a search based upon the absence of a search warrant, the burden then shifts to the State to prove the legality of the search.” Hoskins, 165 Idaho at 221 , 443 P.3d at 235 (quoting State v. Holland, 135 Idaho 159, 162 , 15 P.3d 1167, 1170 (2000)). 2023“When the defendant challenges the legality of a search based upon the absence of a search warrant, the burden then shifts to the State to prove the legality of the search.” Hoskins, 165 Idaho at 221 , 443 P.3d at 235 (quoting State v. Holland, 135 Idaho 159, 162 , 15 P.3d 1167, 1170 (2000)). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Tristum Beeks, IIgreen2 sentences2023State v. Beeks, 159 Idaho 223, 231 , 358 P.3d 784, 792 (Ct. App. 2015). 2023State v. Beeks, 159 Idaho 223, 231 , 358 P.3d 784, 792 (Ct. App. 2015). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Bishop
green
2 sentences2023Evidence obtained in direct violation of either the Fourth Amendment or Article I, section 17 may not be used as evidence against the victim of the violation. 1 Segura v. United States, 468 U.S. 796, 804 (1984); State v. Koivu, 152 Idaho 511, 516 , 272 P.3d 483, 488 (2012); Bishop, 146 Idaho at 810–11, 203 P.3d at 1209–10. 2023Evidence obtained in direct violation of either the Fourth Amendment or Article I, section 17 may not be used as evidence against the victim of the violation. 1 Segura v. United States, 468 U.S. 796, 804 (1984); State v. Koivu, 152 Idaho 511, 516 , 272 P.3d 483, 488 (2012); Bishop, 146 Idaho at 810–11, 203 P.3d at 1209–10. | 3 | 2022–2023 |
State v. Huntley
green
1 sentence2023“Under the exclusionary rule, evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment generally may not be used against the victim of the violation.” State v. Huntley, 170 Idaho 521 , 526, 513 P.3d 1141 , 1146 (2022). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
State v. Hoskins
green
2 sentences2023“When the defendant challenges the legality of a search based upon the absence of a search warrant, the burden then shifts to the State to prove the legality of the search.” Hoskins, 165 Idaho at 221 , 443 P.3d at 235 (quoting State v. Holland, 135 Idaho 159, 162 , 15 P.3d 1167, 1170 (2000)). 2023“When the defendant challenges the legality of a search based upon the absence of a search warrant, the burden then shifts to the State to prove the legality of the search.” Hoskins, 165 Idaho at 221 , 443 P.3d at 235 (quoting State v. Holland, 135 Idaho 159, 162 , 15 P.3d 1167, 1170 (2000)). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Wong Sun v. United States
green
1 sentence2022Bishop, 146 Idaho at 810–11, 203 P.3d at 1209–10; Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471 , 487–88 (1963). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
State v. Brent W. Higley
green
2 sentences2013Higley, 151 Idaho at 79-80 , 253 P.3d at 753-54 . 2013Higley, 151 Idaho at 79-80 , 253 P.3d at 753-54 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.