6 North Dakota opinions name it 1 courts 2007–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Dakota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Johnson v. North Dakota Workers' Compensation Bureaugreen2 sentences2015“When no statutory remedy is provided for a statutory violation, we look to whether the victim of the violation was prejudiced.” Johnson v. North Dakota Workers’ Compensation Bureau, 539 N.W.2d 295, 298 (N.D.1995); see Rule 61, N.D.R.Civ.P. (instructing courts to disregard errors which do not affect “substantial rights”). 2014Bureau , 539 N.W.2d 295, 298 (N.D. 1995) (“When no statutory remedy is provided for a statutory violation, we look to whether the victim of the violation was prejudiced.”). [¶15] Whedbee argues under N.D.C.C. § 65-05-08.3 that Dr. Balk’s opinion should have been given controlling weight unless WSI explained the weight it gave to Dr. Balk’s and Dr. Bateman’s opinions under the statutory criteria for resolving conflicting opinions. | 3 | 3 |
State v. Davenportgreen2 sentences2007Additionally, N.D.C.C. § 29-04-03.2 provides, “If the victim of a violation of chapter 12.1-20 is under the age of fifteen, the applicable period of limitation, if any, does not begin to run until the victim has reached the age of fifteen.” [¶25] We have previously construed these statutory provisions in State v. Davenport , 536 N.W.2d 686, 687-91 (N.D. 1995), and State v. Buchholz , 2004 ND 77, ¶¶ 14-19 , 678 N.W.2d 144 . 2007Additionally, N.D.C.C. § 29-04-03.2 provides, “If the victim of a violation of chapter 12.1-20 is under the age of fifteen, the applicable period of limitation, if any, does not begin to run until the victim has reached the age of fifteen.” [¶ 25] We have previously construed these statutory provisions in State v. Davenport, 536 N.W.2d 686, 687-91 (N.D.1995), and State v. Buchholz, 2004 ND 77, ¶¶ 14-19 , 678 N.W.2d 144 . | 2 | 2 |
State v. Clarkgreen1 sentence2026Bureau, 539 N.W.2d 295, 298 (N.D. 1995); City of Fargo v. Wieland, 2019 ND 286, ¶ 24 , 936 N.W.2d 55 (same); see also N.D.R.Civ.P. 61 (“At every stage of the proceeding, the court must disregard all errors and defects that do not affect any party’s substantial rights.”). “[T]he Legislature is presumed to know the law when enacting legislation,” State v. Clark, 367 N.W.2d 168, 170 (N.D. 1985), and this 1During oral argument, Meridian’s counsel contended the itemization of damages was timely because the termination of the lease occurred at the end of the lease term rather than when Cordie was ev | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Dakota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Buchholz
green
2 sentences2007Additionally, N.D.C.C. § 29-04-03.2 provides, “If the victim of a violation of chapter 12.1-20 is under the age of fifteen, the applicable period of limitation, if any, does not begin to run until the victim has reached the age of fifteen.” [¶25] We have previously construed these statutory provisions in State v. Davenport , 536 N.W.2d 686, 687-91 (N.D. 1995), and State v. Buchholz , 2004 ND 77, ¶¶ 14-19 , 678 N.W.2d 144 . 2007Additionally, N.D.C.C. § 29-04-03.2 provides, “If the victim of a violation of chapter 12.1-20 is under the age of fifteen, the applicable period of limitation, if any, does not begin to run until the victim has reached the age of fifteen.” [¶25] We have previously construed these statutory provisions in State v. Davenport , 536 N.W.2d 686, 687-91 (N.D. 1995), and State v. Buchholz , 2004 ND 77, ¶¶ 14-19 , 678 N.W.2d 144 . | 2 | 2007–2007 |
City of Fargo v. Wieland
neutral
1 sentence2026Bureau, 539 N.W.2d 295, 298 (N.D. 1995); City of Fargo v. Wieland, 2019 ND 286, ¶ 24 , 936 N.W.2d 55 (same); see also N.D.R.Civ.P. 61 (“At every stage of the proceeding, the court must disregard all errors and defects that do not affect any party’s substantial rights.”). “[T]he Legislature is presumed to know the law when enacting legislation,” State v. Clark, 367 N.W.2d 168, 170 (N.D. 1985), and this 1During oral argument, Meridian’s counsel contended the itemization of damages was timely because the termination of the lease occurred at the end of the lease term rather than when Cordie was ev | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Bayles v. North Dakota Department of Transportation
green
2 sentences2019Dep’t of Transp., 2015 ND 298, ¶ 17 , 872 N.W.2d 626 (quoting Johnson v. N.D. 2019Dep’t of Transp., 2015 ND 298, ¶ 17 , 872 N.W.2d 626 (quoting Johnson v. N.D. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.