6 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 2000–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Nusom v. Comh Woodburn, Inc.green1 sentence2017See Nusom, 122 F.3d at 833-34 (plaintiff was entitled to attorney fees as prevailing party under Truth in Lending Act and Oregon's civil racketeering statute); Webb, 147 F.3d at 623 (court determined plaintiff had prevailed in his ADA claim, and therefore he could recover attorney fees under the ADA, which provides attorney fees to prevailing party). | 1 | 1 |
Dennis Webb, Sr. v. Dick James and Dick James Ford, Inc., a Corporation of Illinoisgreen1 sentence2017See Nusom, 122 F.3d at 833-34 (plaintiff was entitled to attorney fees as prevailing party under Truth in Lending Act and Oregon's civil racketeering statute); Webb, 147 F.3d at 623 (court determined plaintiff had prevailed in his ADA claim, and therefore he could recover attorney fees under the ADA, which provides attorney fees to prevailing party). | 1 | 1 |
Damron v. North Dakota Commissioner of Correctionsgreen2 sentences2004See Damron v. North Dakota Com’r of Corrections, 299 F. Supp. 2d 970, 977 (D.N.D. 2004) (citing Layton v. Elder, 143 F.3d 469, 472 [8th Cir. 1998]). 2004See Damron v. North Dakota Com’r of Corrections, 299 F. Supp. 2d 970, 977 (D.N.D. 2004) (citing Layton v. Elder, 143 F.3d 469, 472 [8th Cir. 1998]). | 1 | 1 |
Richard Ray Layton Billy R. Penny v. Ted Elder, as County Judge of Montgomery County, Arkansasgreen2 sentences2004See Damron v. North Dakota Com’r of Corrections, 299 F. Supp. 2d 970, 977 (D.N.D. 2004) (citing Layton v. Elder, 143 F.3d 469, 472 [8th Cir. 1998]). 2004See Damron v. North Dakota Com’r of Corrections, 299 F. Supp. 2d 970, 977 (D.N.D. 2004) (citing Layton v. Elder, 143 F.3d 469, 472 [8th Cir. 1998]). | 1 | 1 |
Thrope v. State of Ohiogreen2 sentences2000Tenn. 1998) (noting that the “great weight of authority” has rejected states’ claims of immunity under the Eleventh Amendment when facing an ADA claim brought by a private citizen in federal court); Thrope v. State of Ohio, 19 F. Supp. 2d 816, 821-22 (S.D. 2000Tenn. 1998) (noting that the “great weight of authority” has rejected states’ claims of immunity under the Eleventh Amendment when facing an ADA claim brought by a private citizen in federal court); Thrope v. State of Ohio, 19 F. Supp. 2d 816, 821-22 (S.D. | 1 | 1 |
Lamb v. John Umstead Hospitalgreen2 sentences2000Ohio 1998) (noting that the “clear majority” of courts have held that the ADA is a proper exercise of congressional power and holding that Ohio could not claim immunity pursuant to the Eleventh Amendment from a claim brought in a class action lawsuit); Lamb v. John Umstead Hosp., 19 F. Supp. 2d 498, 510 (E.D. 2000Ohio 1998) (noting that the “clear majority” of courts have held that the ADA is a proper exercise of congressional power and holding that Ohio could not claim immunity pursuant to the Eleventh Amendment from a claim brought in a class action lawsuit); Lamb v. John Umstead Hosp., 19 F. Supp. 2d 498, 510 (E.D. | 1 | 1 |
Charlie Milton v. Scrivner, Inc., Gary Massey v. Scrivner, Inc.green2 sentences2000Second, if (but only if) we conclude that the individual is not able to perform the essential functions of the job, we must determine whether any reasonable accommodation by the employer would enable him to perform those functions.’ ” (Emphasis added.) Milton v. Scrivner, Inc., 53 F.3d 1118, 1123 (10th Cir. 1995) (quoting White, 45 F.3d at 360-61 ). 2000Second, if (but only if) we conclude that the individual is not able to perform the essential functions of the job, we must determine whether any reasonable accommodation by the employer would enable him to perform those functions.’ ” (Emphasis added.) Milton v. Scrivner, Inc., 53 F.3d 1118, 1123 (10th Cir. 1995) (quoting White, 45 F.3d at 360-61 ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Rebarchek v. Farmers Cooperative Elevator & Mercantile Ass'n
green
2 sentences2001With regard to Rebarchek’s KAAD claim, the federal district court stated: “[T]he basis of this claim is the same as the ADA claim and the relevant KAAD provisions are virtually identical to the ADA, [thus] summary judgment is likewise appropriate on plaintiffs KAAD claim.” 60 F. Supp. 2d at 1153 . 2001With regard to Rebarchek’s KAAD claim, the federal district court stated: “[T]he basis of this claim is the same as the ADA claim and the relevant KAAD provisions are virtually identical to the ADA, [thus] summary judgment is likewise appropriate on plaintiffs KAAD claim.” 60 F. Supp. 2d at 1153 . | 2 | 2001–2001 |
Allred v. Solaray, Inc.
green
2 sentences2004Because an ADA claim is not a claim of injury to the person, but rather a claim of injury to the person’s rights or reputation, the court held ADA claims do not survive a plaintiffs death under Utah law. 971 F. Supp. at 1398 . 2004Because an ADA claim is not a claim of injury to the person, but rather a claim of injury to the person’s rights or reputation, the court held ADA claims do not survive a plaintiffs death under Utah law. 971 F. Supp. at 1398 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Carter v. City of Emporia, Kan.
green
2 sentences2004Ruby, on the other hand, cites Carter v. City of Emporia, Kan., 543 F. Supp. 354 (D. 2004Ruby, on the other hand, cites Carter v. City of Emporia, Kan., 543 F. Supp. 354 (D. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Garrett v. University of AL
green
1 sentence2000The United States Supreme Court has granted certiorari in Garrett v. University of Alabama, 193 F.3d 1214 , solely on the issue of whether Congress effectively abrogated the states’ immunity when it enacted the ADA. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
David L. White v. York International Corporation
green
2 sentences2000Second, if (but only if) we conclude that the individual is not able to perform the essential functions of the job, we must determine whether any reasonable accommodation by the employer would enable him to perform those functions.’ ” (Emphasis added.) Milton v. Scrivner, Inc., 53 F.3d 1118, 1123 (10th Cir. 1995) (quoting White, 45 F.3d at 360-61 ). 2000Second, if (but only if) we conclude that the individual is not able to perform the essential functions of the job, we must determine whether any reasonable accommodation by the employer would enable him to perform those functions.’ ” (Emphasis added.) Milton v. Scrivner, Inc., 53 F.3d 1118, 1123 (10th Cir. 1995) (quoting White, 45 F.3d at 360-61 ). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.