Account information only. It is never shown to the AI client you connect, and it is kept apart from your research — which is not logged at all.
Your token is the key to the MCP: claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode take it in the URL; Claude Code and the rest take it as a bearer header. It is also in your welcome email. Install instructions.
No token yet. One token per address, shown once and mailed to you with setup steps — claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode need it in the URL; Claude Code and the rest take it as a bearer header. Install instructions.
Your MCP token. Anyone holding it can search on your subscription, so keep it off shared screens.
Header form (recommended) — this endpoint, with
Authorization: Bearer <your token>.
URL form — for claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode, which cannot set a header. The whole credential is in the address:
The dedicated fast index: searches run on a machine nobody else queues for, with full-text highlighted excerpts. Higher MCP limits, and semantic search when it lands.
See ProThank you.
Manage billingDelete my account: email [email protected] and it is done by hand, usually the same day. (Self-serve deletion is not built yet.)
Free, and it takes a minute. Registered visitors skip the Cloudflare checks, and your MCP token for Claude or ChatGPT is issued at the end of this.
Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
Here is your MCP token. It is shown once — it is also in the welcome email we just sent you, with setup steps.
Header form (recommended) — this endpoint, with
Authorization: Bearer <your token>.
URL form — for claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode, which cannot set a header. The whole credential is in the address:
That address already had a token, so we did not issue a second one — two live credentials for one mailbox is how people end up with a working laptop and a broken office machine. Your connector URL is in your inbox under “Your Syfert legal research connector URL”; if it is gone, call 904-383-7448.
6 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1940–2022 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Chaneygreen2 sentences2022State v. Chaney, 375 Md. 168, 181 (2003) (“Judges, lawyers and laymen alike are all presumed to know the law regardless of conscious knowledge or lack thereof, and are presumed to intend the necessary and legitimate consequences of their actions in its light . . . .” (quoting Samson v. State, 27 Md. 2022State v. Chaney, 375 Md. 168, 181 (2003) (“Judges, lawyers and laymen alike are all presumed to know the law regardless of conscious knowledge or lack thereof, and are presumed to intend the necessary and legitimate consequences of their actions in its light . . . .” (quoting Samson v. State, 27 Md. | 2 | 2 |
Samson v. Stategreen2 sentences2022State v. Chaney, 375 Md. 168, 181 (2003) (“Judges, lawyers and laymen alike are all presumed to know the law regardless of conscious knowledge or lack thereof, and are presumed to intend the necessary and legitimate consequences of their actions in its light . . . .” (quoting Samson v. State, 27 Md. 2022State v. Chaney, 375 Md. 168, 181 (2003) (“Judges, lawyers and laymen alike are all presumed to know the law regardless of conscious knowledge or lack thereof, and are presumed to intend the necessary and legitimate consequences of their actions in its light . . . .” (quoting Samson v. State, 27 Md. | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Weiprecht v. Gill
green
2 sentences2001We think that although they are not on all fours with the instant case as to the facts, the reasoning of Zittle v. Weller, 63 Md. 190 , Mims v. Armstrong, 31 Md. 87 , and Weiprecht v. Gill, 191 Md. 478 , 62 A. 2d 253 , support our conclusion. 2001We think that although they are not on all fours with the instant case as to the facts, the reasoning of Zittle v. Weller, 63 Md. 190 , Mims v. Armstrong, 31 Md. 87 , and Weiprecht v. Gill, 191 Md. 478 , 62 A. 2d 253 , support our conclusion. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Mims v. Armstrong
green
1 sentence2001We think that although they are not on all fours with the instant case as to the facts, the reasoning of Zittle v. Weller, 63 Md. 190 , Mims v. Armstrong, 31 Md. 87 , and Weiprecht v. Gill, 191 Md. 478 , 62 A. 2d 253 , support our conclusion. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Zittle v. Weller
green
1 sentence2001We think that although they are not on all fours with the instant case as to the facts, the reasoning of Zittle v. Weller, 63 Md. 190 , Mims v. Armstrong, 31 Md. 87 , and Weiprecht v. Gill, 191 Md. 478 , 62 A. 2d 253 , support our conclusion. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Government Employees Insurance v. Group Hospitalization Medical Services, Inc.
green
2 sentences1996Id. at 652 , 589 A.2d 464 . 1996Id. at 652 , 589 A.2d 464 . | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Attorney General v. Johnson
green
2 sentences1979Attorney General v. Johnson, 282 Md. 274 , 306 n. 30, 385 A. 2d 57 (1978); Governor v. Exxon Corp., 279 Md. 410 , 438 n. 8, 370 A. 2d 1102 , 1118 n. 8 (1977), aff’d, 437 U. S. 117 , 98 S. Ct. 2207 , 57 L.Ed.2d 91 (1978); Bruce v. Dir., Chesapeake Bay Aff., 261 Md. 585, 600 , 276 A. 2d 200 (1971); Celanese Corporation v. Davis, 186 Md. 463, 471-472 , 47 A. 2d 379 (1946). 1979Attorney General v. Johnson, 282 Md. 274 , 306 n. 30, 385 A. 2d 57 (1978); Governor v. Exxon Corp., 279 Md. 410 , 438 n. 8, 370 A. 2d 1102 , 1118 n. 8 (1977), aff’d, 437 U. S. 117 , 98 S. Ct. 2207 , 57 L.Ed.2d 91 (1978); Bruce v. Dir., Chesapeake Bay Aff., 261 Md. 585, 600 , 276 A. 2d 200 (1971); Celanese Corporation v. Davis, 186 Md. 463, 471-472 , 47 A. 2d 379 (1946). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Celanese Corp. of America v. Davis
green
2 sentences1979Attorney General v. Johnson, 282 Md. 274 , 306 n. 30, 385 A. 2d 57 (1978); Governor v. Exxon Corp., 279 Md. 410 , 438 n. 8, 370 A. 2d 1102 , 1118 n. 8 (1977), aff’d, 437 U. S. 117 , 98 S. Ct. 2207 , 57 L.Ed.2d 91 (1978); Bruce v. Dir., Chesapeake Bay Aff., 261 Md. 585, 600 , 276 A. 2d 200 (1971); Celanese Corporation v. Davis, 186 Md. 463, 471-472 , 47 A. 2d 379 (1946). 1979Attorney General v. Johnson, 282 Md. 274 , 306 n. 30, 385 A. 2d 57 (1978); Governor v. Exxon Corp., 279 Md. 410 , 438 n. 8, 370 A. 2d 1102 , 1118 n. 8 (1977), aff’d, 437 U. S. 117 , 98 S. Ct. 2207 , 57 L.Ed.2d 91 (1978); Bruce v. Dir., Chesapeake Bay Aff., 261 Md. 585, 600 , 276 A. 2d 200 (1971); Celanese Corporation v. Davis, 186 Md. 463, 471-472 , 47 A. 2d 379 (1946). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Governor of the State v. Exxon Corp.
green
2 sentences1979Attorney General v. Johnson, 282 Md. 274 , 306 n. 30, 385 A. 2d 57 (1978); Governor v. Exxon Corp., 279 Md. 410 , 438 n. 8, 370 A. 2d 1102 , 1118 n. 8 (1977), aff’d, 437 U. S. 117 , 98 S. Ct. 2207 , 57 L.Ed.2d 91 (1978); Bruce v. Dir., Chesapeake Bay Aff., 261 Md. 585, 600 , 276 A. 2d 200 (1971); Celanese Corporation v. Davis, 186 Md. 463, 471-472 , 47 A. 2d 379 (1946). 1979Attorney General v. Johnson, 282 Md. 274 , 306 n. 30, 385 A. 2d 57 (1978); Governor v. Exxon Corp., 279 Md. 410 , 438 n. 8, 370 A. 2d 1102 , 1118 n. 8 (1977), aff’d, 437 U. S. 117 , 98 S. Ct. 2207 , 57 L.Ed.2d 91 (1978); Bruce v. Dir., Chesapeake Bay Aff., 261 Md. 585, 600 , 276 A. 2d 200 (1971); Celanese Corporation v. Davis, 186 Md. 463, 471-472 , 47 A. 2d 379 (1946). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Bruce v. Dir., Chesapeake Bay Aff.
green
2 sentences1979Attorney General v. Johnson, 282 Md. 274 , 306 n. 30, 385 A. 2d 57 (1978); Governor v. Exxon Corp., 279 Md. 410 , 438 n. 8, 370 A. 2d 1102 , 1118 n. 8 (1977), aff’d, 437 U. S. 117 , 98 S. Ct. 2207 , 57 L.Ed.2d 91 (1978); Bruce v. Dir., Chesapeake Bay Aff., 261 Md. 585, 600 , 276 A. 2d 200 (1971); Celanese Corporation v. Davis, 186 Md. 463, 471-472 , 47 A. 2d 379 (1946). 1979Attorney General v. Johnson, 282 Md. 274 , 306 n. 30, 385 A. 2d 57 (1978); Governor v. Exxon Corp., 279 Md. 410 , 438 n. 8, 370 A. 2d 1102 , 1118 n. 8 (1977), aff’d, 437 U. S. 117 , 98 S. Ct. 2207 , 57 L.Ed.2d 91 (1978); Bruce v. Dir., Chesapeake Bay Aff., 261 Md. 585, 600 , 276 A. 2d 200 (1971); Celanese Corporation v. Davis, 186 Md. 463, 471-472 , 47 A. 2d 379 (1946). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Exxon Corp. v. Governor of Maryland
green
2 sentences1979Attorney General v. Johnson, 282 Md. 274 , 306 n. 30, 385 A. 2d 57 (1978); Governor v. Exxon Corp., 279 Md. 410 , 438 n. 8, 370 A. 2d 1102 , 1118 n. 8 (1977), aff’d, 437 U. S. 117 , 98 S. Ct. 2207 , 57 L.Ed.2d 91 (1978); Bruce v. Dir., Chesapeake Bay Aff., 261 Md. 585, 600 , 276 A. 2d 200 (1971); Celanese Corporation v. Davis, 186 Md. 463, 471-472 , 47 A. 2d 379 (1946). 1979Attorney General v. Johnson, 282 Md. 274 , 306 n. 30, 385 A. 2d 57 (1978); Governor v. Exxon Corp., 279 Md. 410 , 438 n. 8, 370 A. 2d 1102 , 1118 n. 8 (1977), aff’d, 437 U. S. 117 , 98 S. Ct. 2207 , 57 L.Ed.2d 91 (1978); Bruce v. Dir., Chesapeake Bay Aff., 261 Md. 585, 600 , 276 A. 2d 200 (1971); Celanese Corporation v. Davis, 186 Md. 463, 471-472 , 47 A. 2d 379 (1946). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Nichols v. Meyer
green
2 sentences1940There is, however, no exception reserved to the ruling of the court on this prayer and the court cannot consider an objection now. 2 Poe, PI. & Pr. secs. 317, 319; Nichols v. Meyer, 139 Md. 450, 456 , 115 A. 786 . 1940There is, however, no exception reserved to the ruling of the court on this prayer and the court cannot consider an objection now. 2 Poe, PI. & Pr. secs. 317, 319; Nichols v. Meyer, 139 Md. 450, 456 , 115 A. 786 . | 1 | 1940–1940 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.