Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
19 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1919–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Clewis v. Statered2 sentences2009Clewis v. State , 922 S.W.2d 126, 134 (Tex. Crim. 2009Clewis v. State, 922 S.W.2d 126, 134 (Tex. Crim. | 2 | 2 |
Birchfield v. Texarkana Memorial Hospitalgreen1 sentence2012See Birchfield v. Texarkana Mem’l Hosp., 747 S.W.2d 361, 365 (Tex. 1987). 15 In this instance, the opinions in the Siegel affidavit are based on the assumption that the standard used by the Texas Supreme Court in Borg-Warner would not have applied to appellant’s underlying claims because the decision was not handed down until 2007 and appellant’s claims were litigated during the time period of 2004–05, while the Borg-Warner case was still on appeal. | 1 | 1 |
Tull v. Chubb Group of Insurance Companiesgreen1 sentence2005See Tull , 146 S.W.3d at 694-95 ; Wilkinson , 601 S.W.2d at 522 . | 1 | 1 |
Rosestone Properties, Inc. v. Schliemanngreen2 sentences1987Rosestone Properties, Inc. v. Schliemann, supra at 52. 1987Rosestone Properties, Inc. v. Schliemann, supra at 52. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Farmers Texas County Mutual Insurance Co. v. Wilkinson
green
2 sentences2007The exception stated in Wilkinson is premised on the assumption of defense of the underlying cause by the insurer. 601 S.W.2d at 521-22 . 2004The exception stated in Wilkinson is premised on the assumption of defense of the underlying cause by the *695 insurer. 601 S.W.2d at 621-22 . | 7 | 2004–2007 |
Spann v. Cochran & Ewing
green
2 sentences1937Spann v. Cochran & Ewing [ 63 Tex. 240 ], supra. “The assumption clause cannot be construed as a mere indemnity'to the grantor. 1919Spann v. Cochran & Ewing, supra. The assumption clause cannot be construed as a mere indemnity to the grantor. | 2 | 1919–1937 |
Hooper Associates Ltd. v. AGS Computers, Inc.
green
1 sentence2022Hooper buttressed its holding that the indemnity/hold-harmless provisions did not embrace interparty fee claims by noting that several of the contract’s other provisions provided for matters such as notice that the claim was being made and an assumption of defense; Hooper concluded that these provisions would be surplusage if read to extend “the indemnification clause to require defendant to reimburse plaintiff for attorney’s fees in the breach[-]of[-]contract action against defendant.” Id. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Mitchel v. State
green
2 sentences2009Id. 2009Id. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.
green
2 sentences1993Id. at ___, 112 S.Ct. at 2617 . 1993Id. at ___, 112 S.Ct. at 2617 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Railroad Commission of Texas v. Southern Pacific Transport Co. of Texas
green
1 sentence1984Railroad Commission of Texas v. Southern Pacific, 649 S.W.2d 713 (Tex.App.1983, no writ). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Carter v. William Sommerville and Son, Inc.
green
1 sentence1983Our reliance on the standard of review enunciated by Carter, supra, and Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., supra, requires that we consider only the evidence favorable to the judgment. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Jefferson Construction Co.
green
1 sentence1983Our reliance on the standard of review enunciated by Carter, supra, and Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., supra, requires that we consider only the evidence favorable to the judgment. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Keeney v. Coffee
neutral
1 sentence1954On this assumption the rule of decision prior to the adoption of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure would have supported the appellant’s contentions about waiver and jurisdiction; and in Keeney v. Coffee, 258 S.W.2d 150 , the Amarillo Court of Civil Appeals applied the former rule of decision under Rules 86 and 87. | 1 | 1954–1954 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.