Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
McIntosh County Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLPgreen1 sentence2018See Frederick , 907 N.W.2d at 173 (explaining the elements of a claim for legal malpractice); McIntosh , 745 N.W.2d at 545 (explaining the privity requirement in legal-malpractice actions). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Alexandergreen1 sentence2016See, e.g., People v. Lemons, 830 N.W.2d 794 , 798 (Mich. Ct. App. 2013) (upholding application of emergency-aid doctrine to police entry where front door was “open and blowing in the wind” and no one responded to the doorbell or knocks); State v. Alexander, 721 A.2d 275, 277 (Md. | 1 | 1 |
Singleton v. Christ the Servant Evangelical Lutheran Churchgreen1 sentence2015IIED claims are “‘sharply limited to cases involving particularly 10 egregious facts.’” Singleton v. Christ the Servant Evangelical Lutheran Church, 541 N.W.2d 606, 614 (Minn. App. 1996) (quoting Hubbard, 330 N.W.2d at 439 ), review denied (Minn. Mar. 19, 1996). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Boycegreen1 sentence1991State v. Boyce, 170 N.W.2d 104, 112 (Minn.1969). | 1 | 1 |
Marriage of Bodmer v. Pattiegreen1 sentence1987Bodmer v. Pattie, 383 N.W.2d 14, 17 (Minn.Ct.App.1986). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.
green
1 sentence2015IIED claims are “‘sharply limited to cases involving particularly 10 egregious facts.’” Singleton v. Christ the Servant Evangelical Lutheran Church, 541 N.W.2d 606, 614 (Minn. App. 1996) (quoting Hubbard, 330 N.W.2d at 439 ), review denied (Minn. Mar. 19, 1996). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Specialized Tours, Inc. v. Hagen
green
1 sentence2007The first element of a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation is only met if the false factual representation by the party involves a "fact susceptible of knowledge." Specialized Tours, 392 N.W.2d at 532 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
State v. Buchanan
green
1 sentence1991The first element of this test is subjective, Buchanan, 431 N.W.2d at 549 , and “it is the emotional status of the defendant which is of primary importance in determining whether a homicide is murder or manslaughter in the first degree”. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.