6 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Miranda v. Arizonagreen1 sentence2024Nor was there any evidence or finding by the district court that law enforcement observed contraband in plain view inside Robinson’s vehicle. 2 See Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 444-45 (1966). 3 In denying Robinson’s motion to suppress, the district court determined that there was an objective legal basis for the traffic stop based on the initial officer’s observation that Robinson’s vehicle was traveling at 68 miles per hour in a 55 mile-per-hour zone. | 1 | 1 |
Black v. Stategreen1 sentence1997See Black, 560 N.W.2d at 85 n. 1. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Hummelgreen1 sentence1995See Hummel, 483 N.W.2d at 74 ; State v. Barbo, 339 N.W.2d 905, 906 (Minn.1983). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Barbogreen1 sentence1995See Hummel, 483 N.W.2d at 74 ; State v. Barbo, 339 N.W.2d 905, 906 (Minn.1983). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Wong Sun v. United States
green
1 sentence2024Citing Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471 (1963), Robinson maintains that we “must” reverse his convictions without remand, asserting that the district court erred by not suppressing “his act in response to being told that his car would be searched and to get out of the car” and “the firearm” as “fruit of the poisonous tree.” The state makes no argument as to the “fruit-of-the-poisonous-tree” doctrine, and the district court did not address that issue in its findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order denying Robinson’s motion. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Application of Saxton
green
2 sentences2016Instead of applying the Robinson standard the district court stated that “once a surname has been selected for a minor child” a change “should be granted only when the change promotes the minor child’s best interests” and addressed the Saxton factors. 309 N.W.2d at 301 . 2016Instead of applying the Robinson standard the district court stated that “once a surname has been selected for a minor child” a change “should be granted only when the change promotes the minor child’s best interests” and addressed the Saxton factors. 309 N.W.2d at 301 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Kolender v. Lawson
green
2 sentences1995Kolender v. Lawson, 461 U.S. 352 , 103 S.Ct. 1855 , 75 L.Ed.2d 903 (1983). 1995Kolender v. Lawson, 461 U.S. 352 , 103 S.Ct. 1855 , 75 L.Ed.2d 903 (1983). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Edwards v. Arizona
green
2 sentences1990Rather, it is a rule designed to implement Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 , 101 S.Ct. 1880 , 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981), which requires custodial interrogation cease once an accused has invoked his right to counsel. 1990Rather, it is a rule designed to implement Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 , 101 S.Ct. 1880 , 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981), which requires custodial interrogation cease once an accused has invoked his right to counsel. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Robinson v. Hansel
green
2 sentences1986Robinson , 302 Minn, at 36, 223 N.W.2d at 140 . 1986Robinson , 302 Minn, at 36, 223 N.W.2d at 140 . | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.