law raises presumption in Missouri

6 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1902–1980 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

Case	Followed	Cited
Cosby v. Hardinggreen moctapp · 1977 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 1980–1980 1 sentence 1980Cosby v. Harding, 553 S.W.2d 535, 536 [1-3] (Mo.App.1977); 17A C.J.S.	1	1
State v. Ayersgreen mo · 1957 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 1973–1973 1 sentence 1973The law presumes malice as a concomitant of a shooting with a dangerous and deadly weapon, State v. Ayers, 305 S.W.2d 484, 486 [2] (Mo.1957); but the element of intent remains a question for the jury and the law raises no presumption about it, State v. Venable, 177 S.W. 308 , 309[5] (Mo.1915).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

Case	Cited	Years
Bottomly v. Bottomly neutral md · 1894 2 sentences 1966The distinction applies also to Bottomly v. Bottomly, 80 Md. 159 , 30 A. 706 , Weekes v. Westchester Newspapers, Inc., Sup., 115 N.Y.S.2d 418 , 54 Rose v. Borenstein, City Ct., 119 N.Y.S.2d 288 , McGraw v. Thomason, 265 Ala. 635 , 93 So.2d 741 , Harper v. Huston, 120 Kan. 194 , 243 P. 305 , Snavely v. Booth, 6 W. 1966The distinction applies also to Bottomly v. Bottomly, 80 Md. 159 , 30 A. 706 , Weekes v. Westchester Newspapers, Inc., Sup., 115 N.Y.S.2d 418 , 54 Rose v. Borenstein, City Ct., 119 N.Y.S.2d 288 , McGraw v. Thomason, 265 Ala. 635 , 93 So.2d 741 , Harper v. Huston, 120 Kan. 194 , 243 P. 305 , Snavely v. Booth, 6 W.	1	1966–1966
Harper v. Huston neutral kan · 1926 2 sentences 1966The distinction applies also to Bottomly v. Bottomly, 80 Md. 159 , 30 A. 706 , Weekes v. Westchester Newspapers, Inc., Sup., 115 N.Y.S.2d 418 , 54 Rose v. Borenstein, City Ct., 119 N.Y.S.2d 288 , McGraw v. Thomason, 265 Ala. 635 , 93 So.2d 741 , Harper v. Huston, 120 Kan. 194 , 243 P. 305 , Snavely v. Booth, 6 W. 1966The distinction applies also to Bottomly v. Bottomly, 80 Md. 159 , 30 A. 706 , Weekes v. Westchester Newspapers, Inc., Sup., 115 N.Y.S.2d 418 , 54 Rose v. Borenstein, City Ct., 119 N.Y.S.2d 288 , McGraw v. Thomason, 265 Ala. 635 , 93 So.2d 741 , Harper v. Huston, 120 Kan. 194 , 243 P. 305 , Snavely v. Booth, 6 W.	1	1966–1966
McGraw v. Thomason green ala · 1957 2 sentences 1966The distinction applies also to Bottomly v. Bottomly, 80 Md. 159 , 30 A. 706 , Weekes v. Westchester Newspapers, Inc., Sup., 115 N.Y.S.2d 418 , 54 Rose v. Borenstein, City Ct., 119 N.Y.S.2d 288 , McGraw v. Thomason, 265 Ala. 635 , 93 So.2d 741 , Harper v. Huston, 120 Kan. 194 , 243 P. 305 , Snavely v. Booth, 6 W. 1966The distinction applies also to Bottomly v. Bottomly, 80 Md. 159 , 30 A. 706 , Weekes v. Westchester Newspapers, Inc., Sup., 115 N.Y.S.2d 418 , 54 Rose v. Borenstein, City Ct., 119 N.Y.S.2d 288 , McGraw v. Thomason, 265 Ala. 635 , 93 So.2d 741 , Harper v. Huston, 120 Kan. 194 , 243 P. 305 , Snavely v. Booth, 6 W.	1	1966–1966
Johnson v. Johnson green ill · 1885 1 sentence 1909The second marriage being shown in fact, the law raises a strong presumption in favor of its legality, which we do not regard as overcome by mere proof of a prior marriage, and that the first wife had not obtained a divorce. [See Johnson v. Johnson, 114 Ill. 617 , 3 N. E. 232 .] The husband might have obtained such divorce, and left him free to contract the second marriage. ’ “In Johnson v. Johnson, 114 Ill. 617 , cited in the foregoing case, the court, per Shove, J., said: ‘But if the law raises the presumption that the former husband was alive at the date of the last marriage, from the fact	1	1909–1909
Hamilton v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. neutral moctapp · 1907 1 sentence 1908In illustration and enforcement of her point she cites many authorities, especially a recent case in this court of Hamilton v. Railway, 123 Mo. App. 619 .	1	1908–1908
Kostuba v. Miller neutral mo · 1897 1 sentence 1902Kostuba v. Miller, supra. The deceased was not related by ties of consanguinity to the plaintiffs, or either of them.	1	1902–1902

Where else courts name it

AL 32 (1884–2007) MS 29 (1955–2024) TX 23 (1878–2012) IN 22 (1894–2018) IL 18 (1872–1960) GA 16 (1904–1985) NC 15 (1889–1980) OK 15 (1915–2011) NJ 8 (1964–2001) NY 8 (1897–1980) MO 6 (1902–1980) IA 6 (1891–2017) VT 6 (1909–1988) WV 4 (1896–1954) MN 4 (1879–2007) KS 4 (1993–2020) PA 4 (1916–1965) MI 4 (1930–1977) CA 3 (1880–1897) AR 3 (1910–1936) KY 3 (1930–1974) SD 2 (1899–1945) MT 2 (1890–1946) OR 2 (1948–1950) ND 2 (1891–1901) TN 2 (1993–1997) AZ 2 (1947–1967)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check