holder claim (Mississippi) · Go Syfert
← Mississippi issues

holder claim in Mississippi

6 Mississippi opinions name it 1 courts 1877–2017 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Estes v. Stategreen
miss · 1988 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 1994–1994
1 sentence

1994Estes v. State, 533 So. 2d 437, 440 (Miss. 1988).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Scott v. Flynt green
miss · 1996
2 sentences

2017The -Scott'Court recognized that a “significant argument about ex parte interviews revolves around who is the holder of the privilege." Id. at 1004 .

1998That is, the manner by which relevant information subject to the medical privilege is acquired is limited to "either a voluntary consensual disclosure by the patient who is the holder of the privilege or the formal discovery process to prevent any breach of confidentiality...." Id.

21998–2017
Great Southern Box Co. v. Barrett green
miss · 1957
2 sentences

1966Great Southern Box Co. v. Barrett, 231 Miss. 101 , 94 So.2d 912 (1957).

1966Great Southern Box Co. v. Barrett, 231 Miss. 101 , 94 So.2d 912 (1957).

21965–1966
White v. The Governor neutral
ala · 1851
1 sentence

1877These views are sustained in White v. Governor, 18 Ala. 767 , under a constitution and statutes like ours.

11877–1877

Where else courts name it

CA 157 (1906–2025) IL 41 (1919–2024) TX 37 (1878–2025) NJ 30 (1895–2021) ID 26 (1909–2020) CO 22 (1963–2026) PA 17 (1924–2025) LA 16 (1845–2025) OH 15 (1907–2024) AL 13 (1876–2014) MA 13 (1900–2020) NY 12 (1862–2016) NM 12 (1999–2018) FL 12 (1994–2024) KS 11 (1878–2020) AZ 11 (1968–2023) CT 10 (1992–2022) WA 7 (1915–2019) OR 7 (1961–2021) MD 7 (1904–2026) SD 7 (1927–2016) NC 6 (1905–2022) GA 6 (1915–2019) MS 6 (1877–2017) IN 5 (1877–2012) DE 5 (2016–2022) NV 4 (2015–2022) MO 4 (1904–1992) ME 4 (2010–2020) NE 4 (1934–2018) MT 4 (1940–2020) IA 4 (1930–2010) MN 4 (1919–2006) MI 4 (1989–2015) VA 3 (1987–2022) UT 3 (1914–2011) KY 3 (1952–2003) WI 3 (1995–2014) AK 3 (2012–2023) NH 3 (2006–2011) HI 2 (2003–2005) OK 2 (1917–1940) VT 2 (2005–2005) SC 2 (1900–1975)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check