6 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Holloway v. Arkansasgreen2 sentences1997"In the normal case where a harmless-error rule is applied, ... the reviewing court can undertake with some confidence its relatively narrow task of assessing the likelihood that error materially affected the deliberations of the jury." Id. ( quoting Holloway v. Arkansas, 435 U.S 475, 490, 98 S.Ct. 1173, 1182 , 55 L.Ed.2d 426 (1978)). ¶ 114. 1997"In the normal case where a harmless-error rule is applied, ... the reviewing court can undertake with some confidence its relatively narrow task of assessing the likelihood that error materially affected the deliberations of the jury." Id. ( quoting Holloway v. Arkansas, 435 U.S 475, 490, 98 S.Ct. 1173, 1182 , 55 L.Ed.2d 426 (1978)). ¶ 114. | 1 | 2 |
Bronwyn Benoist Parker v. William Dean Benoistgreen1 sentence2019In light of the above, we find that there was sufficient evidence to “lead a reasonable person, properly informed and advised, to conclude that there was a substantial likelihood that the challenge would be successful.” Parker, 160 So. 3d at 209 (¶24). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Barker v. Wingo
green
2 sentences2000Barker, 407 U.S. at 532 , 92 S.Ct. 2182 . 2000Barker, 407 U.S. at 532 , 92 S.Ct. 2182 . | 3 | 1995–2000 |
Satterwhite v. Texas
green
2 sentences1997"In the normal case where a harmless-error rule is applied, ... the reviewing court can undertake with some confidence its relatively narrow task of assessing the likelihood that error materially affected the deliberations of the jury." Id. ( quoting Holloway v. Arkansas, 435 U.S 475, 490, 98 S.Ct. 1173, 1182 , 55 L.Ed.2d 426 (1978)). ¶ 114. 1992"In the normal case where a harmless-error rule is applied, ... the reviewing court can undertake with some confidence its relatively narrow task of assessing the likelihood that error materially affected the deliberations of the jury." Id. (quoting Holloway v. Arkansas, 435 U.S. 475, 490 (1978)). ¶114. | 2 | 1992–1997 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.