Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
21 Nebraska opinions name it 2 courts 2018–2026 11 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Haynesgreen2 sentences2020State v. Haynes, 299 Neb. 249 , 908 N.W.2d 40 (2018), disapproved on other grounds, State v. Allen, 301 Neb. 560 , 919 N.W.2d 500 (2018). 2020State v. Haynes, 299 Neb. 249 , 908 N.W.2d 40 (2018), disapproved on other grounds, State v. Allen, 301 Neb. 560 , 919 N.W.2d 500 (2018). | 3 | 7 |
State v. Manjikiangreen2 sentences2019Ed. 2d 674 (1984). 47 State v. Ash, 293 Neb. 583 , 878 N.W.2d 569 (2016). 48 Id. 49 State v. Amaya, 276 Neb. 818 , 758 N.W.2d 22 (2008). - 117 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 303 Nebraska R eports STATE v. MANJIKIAN Cite as 303 Neb. 100 the prejudice requirement for an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is satisfied if the defendant shows a reasonable probability that but for the errors of counsel, the defendant would have insisted on going to trial rather than plead- ing guilty.50 The likelihood of the defense’s success had the defendant insisted on going to trial is relevant to 2019Ed. 2d 674 (1984). 47 State v. Ash, 293 Neb. 583 , 878 N.W.2d 569 (2016). 48 Id. 49 State v. Amaya, 276 Neb. 818 , 758 N.W.2d 22 (2008). - 117 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 303 Nebraska R eports STATE v. MANJIKIAN Cite as 303 Neb. 100 the prejudice requirement for an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is satisfied if the defendant shows a reasonable probability that but for the errors of counsel, the defendant would have insisted on going to trial rather than plead- ing guilty.50 The likelihood of the defense’s success had the defendant insisted on going to trial is relevant to | 1 | 8 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Beehn
green
2 sentences2025State v. Beehn, 303 Neb. 172 , 927 N.W.2d 793 (2019). 2025State v. Beehn, 303 Neb. 172 , 927 N.W.2d 793 (2019). | 4 | 2020–2025 |
State v. Allen
green
2 sentences2023Id. 2020State v. Haynes, 299 Neb. 249 , 908 N.W.2d 40 (2018), disapproved on other grounds, State v. Allen, 301 Neb. 560 , 919 N.W.2d 500 (2018). | 4 | 2019–2023 |
State v. Watt
green
2 sentences2019Ed. 2d 674 (1984). 47 State v. Ash, 293 Neb. 583 , 878 N.W.2d 569 (2016). 48 Id. 49 State v. Amaya, 276 Neb. 818 , 758 N.W.2d 22 (2008). - 117 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 303 Nebraska R eports STATE v. MANJIKIAN Cite as 303 Neb. 100 the prejudice requirement for an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is satisfied if the defendant shows a reasonable probability that but for the errors of counsel, the defendant would have insisted on going to trial rather than plead- ing guilty.50 The likelihood of the defense’s success had the defendant insisted on going to trial is relevant to 2019Ed. 2d 674 (1984). 47 State v. Ash, 293 Neb. 583 , 878 N.W.2d 569 (2016). 48 Id. 49 State v. Amaya, 276 Neb. 818 , 758 N.W.2d 22 (2008). - 117 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 303 Nebraska R eports STATE v. MANJIKIAN Cite as 303 Neb. 100 the prejudice requirement for an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is satisfied if the defendant shows a reasonable probability that but for the errors of counsel, the defendant would have insisted on going to trial rather than plead- ing guilty.50 The likelihood of the defense’s success had the defendant insisted on going to trial is relevant to | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Amaya
green
2 sentences2019Ed. 2d 674 (1984). 47 State v. Ash, 293 Neb. 583 , 878 N.W.2d 569 (2016). 48 Id. 49 State v. Amaya, 276 Neb. 818 , 758 N.W.2d 22 (2008). - 117 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 303 Nebraska R eports STATE v. MANJIKIAN Cite as 303 Neb. 100 the prejudice requirement for an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is satisfied if the defendant shows a reasonable probability that but for the errors of counsel, the defendant would have insisted on going to trial rather than plead- ing guilty.50 The likelihood of the defense’s success had the defendant insisted on going to trial is relevant to 2019Ed. 2d 674 (1984). 47 State v. Ash, 293 Neb. 583 , 878 N.W.2d 569 (2016). 48 Id. 49 State v. Amaya, 276 Neb. 818 , 758 N.W.2d 22 (2008). - 117 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 303 Nebraska R eports STATE v. MANJIKIAN Cite as 303 Neb. 100 the prejudice requirement for an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is satisfied if the defendant shows a reasonable probability that but for the errors of counsel, the defendant would have insisted on going to trial rather than plead- ing guilty.50 The likelihood of the defense’s success had the defendant insisted on going to trial is relevant to | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Ash
green
2 sentences2019Ed. 2d 674 (1984). 47 State v. Ash, 293 Neb. 583 , 878 N.W.2d 569 (2016). 48 Id. 49 State v. Amaya, 276 Neb. 818 , 758 N.W.2d 22 (2008). - 117 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 303 Nebraska R eports STATE v. MANJIKIAN Cite as 303 Neb. 100 the prejudice requirement for an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is satisfied if the defendant shows a reasonable probability that but for the errors of counsel, the defendant would have insisted on going to trial rather than plead- ing guilty.50 The likelihood of the defense’s success had the defendant insisted on going to trial is relevant to 2019Ed. 2d 674 (1984). 47 State v. Ash, 293 Neb. 583 , 878 N.W.2d 569 (2016). 48 Id. 49 State v. Amaya, 276 Neb. 818 , 758 N.W.2d 22 (2008). - 117 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 303 Nebraska R eports STATE v. MANJIKIAN Cite as 303 Neb. 100 the prejudice requirement for an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is satisfied if the defendant shows a reasonable probability that but for the errors of counsel, the defendant would have insisted on going to trial rather than plead- ing guilty.50 The likelihood of the defense’s success had the defendant insisted on going to trial is relevant to | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Premo v. Moore
green
2 sentences2018Haynes describes the general nature of the testimony the witnesses would have provided, but this poten- tial testimony generally vouching for the wholesome and non- aggressive nature of Haynes’ relationship with the victim only marginally impacts the likelihood of the defense’s success had Haynes insisted on going to trial. 49 Id. at 12. 50 See, State v. Mora, 298 Neb. 185 , 903 N.W.2d 244 (2017); State v. Abdullah, 289 Neb. 123 , 853 N.W.2d 858 (2014). 51 State v. Yos-Chiguil, supra note 15, 281 Neb. at 634, 798 N.W.2d at 845 (Heavican, C.J., concurring), quoting Premo v. Moore, 562 U.S. 115 2018Haynes describes the general nature of the testimony the witnesses would have provided, but this poten- tial testimony generally vouching for the wholesome and non- aggressive nature of Haynes’ relationship with the victim only marginally impacts the likelihood of the defense’s success had Haynes insisted on going to trial. 49 Id. at 12. 50 See, State v. Mora, 298 Neb. 185 , 903 N.W.2d 244 (2017); State v. Abdullah, 289 Neb. 123 , 853 N.W.2d 858 (2014). 51 State v. Yos-Chiguil, supra note 15, 281 Neb. at 634, 798 N.W.2d at 845 (Heavican, C.J., concurring), quoting Premo v. Moore, 562 U.S. 115 | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Mora
green
1 sentence2018Haynes describes the general nature of the testimony the witnesses would have provided, but this poten- tial testimony generally vouching for the wholesome and non- aggressive nature of Haynes’ relationship with the victim only marginally impacts the likelihood of the defense’s success had Haynes insisted on going to trial. 49 Id. at 12. 50 See, State v. Mora, 298 Neb. 185 , 903 N.W.2d 244 (2017); State v. Abdullah, 289 Neb. 123 , 853 N.W.2d 858 (2014). 51 State v. Yos-Chiguil, supra note 15, 281 Neb. at 634, 798 N.W.2d at 845 (Heavican, C.J., concurring), quoting Premo v. Moore, 562 U.S. 115 | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Abdullah
green
1 sentence2018Haynes describes the general nature of the testimony the witnesses would have provided, but this poten- tial testimony generally vouching for the wholesome and non- aggressive nature of Haynes’ relationship with the victim only marginally impacts the likelihood of the defense’s success had Haynes insisted on going to trial. 49 Id. at 12. 50 See, State v. Mora, 298 Neb. 185 , 903 N.W.2d 244 (2017); State v. Abdullah, 289 Neb. 123 , 853 N.W.2d 858 (2014). 51 State v. Yos-Chiguil, supra note 15, 281 Neb. at 634, 798 N.W.2d at 845 (Heavican, C.J., concurring), quoting Premo v. Moore, 562 U.S. 115 | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.