Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 North Carolina opinions name it 1 courts 1988–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Anderson v. Assimosgreen2 sentences2005See Anderson v. Assimos, 356 N.C. 415, 416 , 572 S.E.2d 101, 102 (2002) (acknowledging the long-held principle of judicial restraint that "the courts of this State will avoid constitutional questions, even if properly presented, where a case may be resolved on other grounds."). 2005See Anderson v. Assimos, 356 N.C. 415, 416 , 572 S.E.2d 101, 102 (2002) (acknowledging the long-held principle of judicial restraint that "the courts of this State will avoid constitutional questions, even if properly presented, where a case may be resolved on other grounds."). | 2 | 2 |
Turner v. Blackburngreen2 sentences2004See Clayton Banking Co. v. Green, 197 N.C. 534, 538 , 149 S.E. 689, 691 (1929); Turner v. Blackburn, 389 F.Supp. 1250, 1256-57 (W.D.N.C.1975). 2004See Clayton Banking Co. v. Green, 197 N.C. 534, 538 , 149 S.E. 689, 691 (1929); Turner v. Blackburn, 389 F. Supp. 1250, 1256-57 (W.D.N.C. 1975). | 2 | 2 |
Clayton Banking Co. v. Greengreen2 sentences2004See Clayton Banking Co. v. Green, 197 N.C. 534, 538 , 149 S.E. 689, 691 (1929); Turner v. Blackburn, 389 F.Supp. 1250, 1256-57 (W.D.N.C.1975). 2004See Clayton Banking Co. v. Green, 197 N.C. 534, 538 , 149 S.E. 689, 691 (1929); Turner v. Blackburn, 389 F.Supp. 1250, 1256-57 (W.D.N.C.1975). | 2 | 2 |
Cone v. Watsongreen1 sentence2023Cone v. Watson, 224 N.C. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Simpsongreen1 sentence2023This is perhaps attributable to the inherent tension between these types of arguments and the long-held principle that “[c]ontradictions and discrepancies in the [evidence in criminal cases] are to be resolved by the jury,” State v. Simpson, 244 N.C. 325, 331 (1956), as well as the understanding in our caselaw that summary judgment on the issue of contributory negligence, by contrast, necessarily requires a judicial determination of an issue ordinarily reserved for the finder of fact. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hamilton v. Travelers Indemnity Co.
green
1 sentence1988Hamilton v. Travelers Indemnity Co., 77 N.C. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.