Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 2000–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Texas Cities Gas Co. v. Dickensgreen2 sentences2004See Texas Cities Gas Co. v. Dickens, 140 Tex. 433 , 168 S.W.2d 208 (1943). 2004See Texas Cities Gas Co. v. Dickens, 140 Tex. 433 , 168 S.W.2d 208 (1943). | 3 | 3 |
Bennet v. Stategreen2 sentences2006Ex parte Guerrero , 99 S.W.3d at 853 ; Bennet v. State , 818 S.W.2d 199, 200 (Tex.App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1991, no pet.). 2006Ex parte Guerrero , 99 S.W.3d at 853 ; Bennet v. State , 818 S.W.2d 199, 200 (Tex.App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1991, no pet.). | 2 | 2 |
DeDonato v. Stategreen1 sentence2015The Court of Criminal Appeals in DeDonato overruled "the basic and long-held principle that a lack ofjurisdiction will render a conviction void and not merely voidable." DeDonato v. State, 819 S.W.2d 164, 166-67 (Tex, Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Matz v. Benniongreen1 sentence2010See Matz v. Bennion , 961 S.W.2d 445,452 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist] 1997, pet. denied); Neece v. A.A.A. | 1 | 1 |
Fierro v. Stategreen1 sentence2009Curtis , 548 S.W.2d at 59 ; accord Fierro v. State , 706 S.W.2d 310, 318 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis, Inc.
green
2 sentences2015Reconsideration should be granted because this Court absolved trial counsel’s deficient performance by failing to recognize the authority of the United States Supreme Court in analyzing its own precedent and instead, ruled that the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals decisions analyzing United States Supreme Court precedent should control. 2 Ineffective Assistance of Counsel As discussed above, on Appeal, Appellant argued that he received ineffective assistance of counsel2 when trial counsel failed to move to suppress the results of the mandatory blood draw in this case pursuant to the United Stat 2015Rehearing should be granted because this Court absolved trial counsel’s deficient performance by failing to recognize the authority of the United States Supreme Court in analyzing its own precedent and instead, ruled that the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals decisions analyzing United States Supreme Court precedent should control. 2 Ineffective Assistance of Counsel As discussed above, on Appeal, Appellant argued that he received ineffective assistance of counsel2 when trial counsel failed to move to suppress the results of the mandatory blood draw in this case pursuant to the United States Sup | 2 | 2015–2015 |
Ex Parte Guerrero
green
2 sentences2006Ex parte Guerrero , 99 S.W.3d at 853 ; Bennet v. State , 818 S.W.2d 199, 200 (Tex.App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1991, no pet.). 2006Ex parte Guerrero , 99 S.W.3d at 853 ; Bennet v. State , 818 S.W.2d 199, 200 (Tex.App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1991, no pet.). | 2 | 2006–2006 |
G-W-L, Inc. v. Robichaux
green
2 sentences2000The supreme court held the waiver language in the contract was enforceable, reiterating the long-held rule that "[t]he parties to a contract have an obligation to protect themselves by reading what they sign." Id. 2000The supreme court held the waiver language in the contract was enforceable, reiterating the long-held rule that “[t]he parties to a contract have an obligation to protect themselves by reading what they sign.” Id. | 2 | 2000–2000 |
Curtis v. State
green
1 sentence2009Curtis , 548 S.W.2d at 59 ; accord Fierro v. State , 706 S.W.2d 310, 318 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.