Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Tennessee opinions name it 3 courts 2010–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Olivieri v. Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc.green1 sentence2025Finally, the employers ask this Court to consider longstanding “liberal federal policy favoring arbitration.” However, courts considering the passage of the Act have repeatedly recognized that it “pulls back on the long-held presumption towards arbitration where sexual harassment is concerned.” Steinberg, 2022 WL 3371323 , at *2; see, e.g., Olivieri, 112 F.4th at 84 (“The EFAA is codified directly into the FAA and limits the scope of this broad mandate to enforce arbitration agreements.”); Newton v. LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton Inc., 746 F.Supp.3d 135 , 150 (S.D.N.Y. 2024) (“the EFAA direc | 1 | 1 |
Cole v. Dychgreen1 sentence2022Recently, the Tennessee Supreme Court reiterated the long-held principle that mandatory injunctions are extraordinary in nature and “has cautioned that this relief should be granted only in exceptional circumstances.” Id. at 395 (citing Cole v. Dych, 535 S.W.2d 315, 322 (Tenn. 1976); King v. Elrod, 196 Tenn. 378 , 268 S.W.2d 103, 106 (Tenn. 1954)). | 1 | 1 |
Holloway v. Bradleygreen2 sentences2022See, e.g., Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-6-106 (a) (stating that custody determinations “shall be made on the basis of the best interest of the child”); Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-6-401 (“In any proceeding between parents under this chapter, the best interests of the child shall be the standard by which the court determines and allocates the parties’ parental responsibilities.”); Kelly v. Kelly, 445 S.W.3d 685, 696 (Tenn. 2014) (“The overarching ‘standard by which courts determine and allocate the parties’ parental responsibilities’ after divorce is the ‘best interests of the child.’”) (quoting Tenn. Code An 2022See, e.g., Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-6-106 (a) (stating that custody determinations “shall be made on the basis of the best interest of the child”); Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-6-401 (“In any proceeding between parents under this chapter, the best interests of the child shall be the standard by which the court determines and allocates the parties’ parental responsibilities.”); Kelly v. Kelly, 445 S.W.3d 685, 696 (Tenn. 2014) (“The overarching ‘standard by which courts determine and allocate the parties’ parental responsibilities’ after divorce is the ‘best interests of the child.’”) (quoting Tenn. Code An | 1 | 1 |
Luke v. Lukegreen1 sentence2022See, e.g., Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-6-106 (a) (stating that custody determinations “shall be made on the basis of the best interest of the child”); Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-6-401 (“In any proceeding between parents under this chapter, the best interests of the child shall be the standard by which the court determines and allocates the parties’ parental responsibilities.”); Kelly v. Kelly, 445 S.W.3d 685, 696 (Tenn. 2014) (“The overarching ‘standard by which courts determine and allocate the parties’ parental responsibilities’ after divorce is the ‘best interests of the child.’”) (quoting Tenn. Code An | 1 | 1 |
King v. Elrodgreen1 sentence2022Recently, the Tennessee Supreme Court reiterated the long-held principle that mandatory injunctions are extraordinary in nature and “has cautioned that this relief should be granted only in exceptional circumstances.” Id. at 395 (citing Cole v. Dych, 535 S.W.2d 315, 322 (Tenn. 1976); King v. Elrod, 196 Tenn. 378 , 268 S.W.2d 103, 106 (Tenn. 1954)). | 1 | 1 |
Terri Ann Kelly v. Willard Reed Kellygreen1 sentence2022See, e.g., Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-6-106 (a) (stating that custody determinations “shall be made on the basis of the best interest of the child”); Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-6-401 (“In any proceeding between parents under this chapter, the best interests of the child shall be the standard by which the court determines and allocates the parties’ parental responsibilities.”); Kelly v. Kelly, 445 S.W.3d 685, 696 (Tenn. 2014) (“The overarching ‘standard by which courts determine and allocate the parties’ parental responsibilities’ after divorce is the ‘best interests of the child.’”) (quoting Tenn. Code An | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Michael Dwayne EDWARDS v. STATE of Tennessee, Wayne Brandon, Warden
green
2 sentences2011Today’s majority opinion properly reiterates the long-held principle, first enumerated in Burkhart, that a sentence is illegal and void, and thus may form a basis for habeas relief, if it is imposed “in direct contravention of a governing sentencing statute” or if it is a sentence “not available under the sentencing statutes governing the case.” See Edwards, 269 S.W.3d at 921 . 2010Today’s majority opinion properly reiterates the long-held principle, first enumerated in Burkhart, that a sentence is illegal and void, and thus may form a basis for habeas relief, if it is imposed “in direct contravention of a governing sentencing statute” or if it is a sentence “not available under the sentencing statutes governing the case.” See Edwards, 269 S.W.3d at 921 . | 2 | 2010–2011 |
King v. Elrod
neutral
1 sentence2022Recently, the Tennessee Supreme Court reiterated the long-held principle that mandatory injunctions are extraordinary in nature and “has cautioned that this relief should be granted only in exceptional circumstances.” Id. at 395 (citing Cole v. Dych, 535 S.W.2d 315, 322 (Tenn. 1976); King v. Elrod, 196 Tenn. 378 , 268 S.W.2d 103, 106 (Tenn. 1954)). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Hunt v. Shaw
green
1 sentence2011Id. at 307-08 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.