heart inquiry (Indiana) · Go Syfert
← Indiana issues

heart inquiry in Indiana

47 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (13)

CaseFollowedCited
Yamobi v. Stategreen
ind · 1996 · cited in 10 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 1997–2018
2 sentences

2014And “the heart of the inquiry is whether the statement is inherently reliable because the declarant was incapable of thoughtful reflection.” Yamobi v. State, 672 N.E.2d 1344, 1346 (Ind. 1996).

2013Rather, “the heart of the inquiry is whether the statement is inherently reliable because the declarant was incapable of thoughtful reflection.” Yamobi v. State, 672 N.E.2d 1344, 1346 (Ind. 1996).

610
Jones v. Stategreen
indctapp · 2003 · cited in 5 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2004–2020
2 sentences

2020“The heart of the inquiry is whether the declarant was incapable of thoughtful reflection.” Jones v. State, 800 N.E.2d 624, 627 (Ind. Ct. App. 2003). [19] The Court’s decision in Ramsey v. State, 122 N.E.3d 1023 (Ind. Ct. App. 2019), trans. denied, provides guidance on the span of time that may elapse between a Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 19A-CR-1547 | February 7, 2020 Page 6 of 11 startling event and an utterance.

2012“The heart of the inquiry is whether the declar-ant was incapable of thoughtful reflection.” Jones v. State, 800 N.E.2d 624, 627 (Ind. Ct.App.2003).

45
Marcum v. Stategreen
indctapp · 2002 · cited in 3 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2003–2014
2 sentences

2014Marcum v. State, 772 N.E.2d 998, 1001 (Ind. Ct. App. 2002).

2010"The heart of the inquiry is whether the declarant was incapable of thoughtful reflection." Id. (citing Marcum v. State, 772 N.E.2d 998, 1001 (Ind.Ct.App.2002)).

33
Boatner v. Stategreen
indctapp · 2010 · cited in 8 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2011–2020
2 sentences

2020“The heart of the inquiry is whether the declarant was incapable of thoughtful reflection.” Id. (citation omitted).

2020“The heart of the inquiry is whether the declarant was incapable of thoughtful reflection.” Id.

28
Burdine v. Stategreen
indctapp · 2001 · cited in 2 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2004–2004
2 sentences

2004Further, "(tlhe amount of time that has passed between the event and the statement is relevant but not dispostive." Burdine v. State, 751 N.E.2d 260, 264 (Ind.Ct.App.2001), trans. denied (citing Noojin v. State, 730 N.E.2d 672, 676 (Ind.2000)).

2004Further, "[the amount of time that has passed between the event and the statement is relevant but not dis-positive." Burdine v. State, 751 N.E.2d 260, 264 (Ind.Ct.App.2001) (citing Noojin v. State, 730 N.E.2d 672, 676 (Ind.2000)).

22
Noojin v. Stategreen
ind · 2000 · cited in 2 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2004–2004
2 sentences

2004Further, "(tlhe amount of time that has passed between the event and the statement is relevant but not dispostive." Burdine v. State, 751 N.E.2d 260, 264 (Ind.Ct.App.2001), trans. denied (citing Noojin v. State, 730 N.E.2d 672, 676 (Ind.2000)).

2004Further, "[the amount of time that has passed between the event and the statement is relevant but not dis-positive." Burdine v. State, 751 N.E.2d 260, 264 (Ind.Ct.App.2001) (citing Noojin v. State, 730 N.E.2d 672, 676 (Ind.2000)).

22
Palacios v. Stategreen
indctapp · 2010 · cited in 4 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2012–2018
2 sentences

2018Id. (citing Yamobi, 672 N.E.2d at 1346 ).

2016Palacios v. State, 926 N.E.2d 1026, 1030-1031 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010).

14
Washington v. Allisongreen
indctapp · 1992 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
1 sentence

2015It is well established that “[d]ue process requires service of notice in a manner reasonably calculated to inform the defendant of the pending lawsuit.” Washington v. Allison, 593 N.E.2d 1273, 1276 (Ind. Ct. App. 1992).

11
Minnick v. Stategreen
ind · 1998 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
1 sentence

2014See Ind. Post-Conviction Rule 1(8); Minnick v. State, 698 N.E.2d 745, 753 (Ind.1998) (declaring, “[b]ecause the defendant’s final amended post-conviction petition did not claim denial of counsel from the failure to request funds, this specific claimed failure is not available in this appeal”). the post-conviction court, supported by the narrative portion of his petition for post-conviction relief, Hollowell eventually got to the heart of his claim, namely: Counsel rendered ineffective as-asfor failing to argue on appeal the lack of circumstantial evidence to support his conspiracy conviction.

11
Holmes v. Stategreen
ind · 1985 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2004–2004
1 sentence

2004Our supreme court has held "[t]he amount of elapsed time between the *700 incident and the utterance weighs in determining the ability of the witness to regain his or her composure and engage in reflective thought." .Holmes v. State, 480 N.E.2d 916, 918 (Ind.1985). « Thus, "the heart of an inquiry is whether the declar-ant was incapable of thoughtful reflection." Jones v. State, 800 N.E.2d 624, 627 (Ind.App.Ct.2008).

11
Montgomery v. Stategreen
ind · 1998 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999
1 sentence

1999Montgomery v. State, 694 N.E.2d 1137, 1141 (Ind.1998).

11
City of Indianapolis v. Swansongreen
ind · 1983 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999
2 sentences

1999In City of Indianapolis v. Swanson, 448 N.E.2d 668, 670 (Ind.1983), it is easy to see how Swanson's statements with respect to his alleged suffering from epilepsy and his inability to make a living "went to the very heart of his claim against the City." In this case, however, Dr. Blinder's statement describing the profile of people who misrepresent symptoms in cases with "subjective" disabilities, does not go to the heart of this case.

1999In City of Indianapolis v. Swanson, 448 N.E.2d 668, 670 (Ind.1983), it is easy to see how Swanson’s statements with respect to his alleged suffering from epilepsy and his inability to make a living “went to the very heart of his claim against the City.” In this case, however, Dr. Blinder’s statement describing the profile of people who misrepresent symptoms in cases with “subjective” disabilities, does not go to the heart of this case.

11
Teague v. Stategreen
ind · 1978 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996
2 sentences

1996Teague v. State, 269 Ind. 103 , 379 N.E.2d 418, 422 (1978), reh'g denied.

1996Teague v. State, 269 Ind. 103 , 379 N.E.2d 418, 422 (1978), reh'g denied.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (13)

CaseCitedYears
Wells v. State green
ind · 1970
2 sentences

1988As stated in Wells, "[the heart of the rule then is the requirement that the observation, reporting, and the recording of the facts all be made by someone in the regular course of the business." Id.

1983In Wells v. State, (1970) 254 Ind. 608 , 261 N.E.2d 865 , the Court stated the following in describing the history and character of the business records exception, "The heart of the rule then is the requirement that the observation, reporting, and the recording of the facts all be made by someone in the regular course of the business.

31983–1988
Trenton Teague v. State of Indiana green
indctapp · 2012
2 sentences

2019“The heart of the inquiry is whether the declarant was incapable of thoughtful reflection.” Id. [10] Saylor first takes issue with Cruse’s testimony about her encounter with Haithcox.

2014Id.

22014–2019
James O. Young v. State of Indiana green
indctapp · 2012
2 sentences

2019"The heart of the inquiry is whether the declarant was incapable of thoughtful reflection." Id.

2013Id.

22013–2019
Love v. State green
indctapp · 1999
2 sentences

2017Id. (citing Yamobi v. State, 672 N.E.2d 1344, 1346 (Ind. 1996)).

2016Id. (citing Yamobi v. State, 672 N.E.2d 1344, 1346 (Ind. 1996)).

22016–2017
Hardiman v. State green
ind · 2000
2 sentences

2004"The heart of the inquiry is whether the declarants had the time for reflection and deliberation." Id.

2004"The heart of the inquiry is whether the declarants had the time for reflection and deliberation." Id.

22004–2004
State of Indiana v. John B. Larkin green
ind · 2018
1 sentence

2020Id. at 708 . [5] On May 7, 2019, Larkin filed a Motion to Dismiss for State Misconduct alleging that, after the Indiana Supreme Court’s decision was issued, he discovered the State withheld material evidence that the gun involved in the Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 19A-CR-2705 | November 9, 2020 Page 4 of 22 shooting was defective and could discharge even when the safety was engaged or without the trigger being pulled when the gun was dropped or bumped, and he argued the withheld evidence went to the heart of his defense that he accidentally shot Stacey while struggling to keep the gu

12020–2020
Brian Ramsey v. State of Indiana green
indctapp · 2019
1 sentence

2020“The heart of the inquiry is whether the declarant was incapable of thoughtful reflection.” Jones v. State, 800 N.E.2d 624, 627 (Ind. Ct. App. 2003). [19] The Court’s decision in Ramsey v. State, 122 N.E.3d 1023 (Ind. Ct. App. 2019), trans. denied, provides guidance on the span of time that may elapse between a Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 19A-CR-1547 | February 7, 2020 Page 6 of 11 startling event and an utterance.

12020–2020
BloomBank v. United Fidelity Bank F.S.B. green
indctapp · 2018
1 sentence

2019BloomBank, 113 N.E.3d at 721 .

12019–2019
Sandefur v. State green
indctapp · 2011
1 sentence

2016Id. [34] Stewart contends that statements by Mother as to what L.S. told her on the evening of April 21, 2010, when he disclosed the abuse by Stewart, and testimony by Horn regarding what C.S. disclosed to her when she met with him on April 22, 2010 were improperly admitted as excited utterances.

12016–2016
Jenkins v. State green
ind · 2000
1 sentence

2010"The heart of the inquiry is whether the declarant was incapable of thoughtful reflection." Id. (citing Marcum v. State, 772 N.E.2d 998, 1001 (Ind.Ct.App.2002)).

12010–2010
Gordon v. State green
indctapp · 2001
1 sentence

2009The heart of the inquiry is whether the statement was "inherently reliable because the witness was under the stress of an event and unlikely to make deliberate falsifications." Id.

12009–2009
Hammon v. State green
indctapp · 2004
1 sentence

2004"The heart of the inquiry is whether the declarants had the time for reflection and deliberation." Id.

12004–2004
Lieberenz v. State green
indctapp · 1999
2 sentences

2003Lieberenz, 717 N.E.2d at 1245 .

2003Lieberenz, 717 N.E.2d at 1245 .

12003–2003

Statutes the citing opinions construe

IN § Ind. Code § 35-42-2-1 (16) IN § Ind. Code § 35-42-1-1 (4) IN § Ind. Code § 35-42-2-1.3 (3) IN § Ind. Code § 35-42-3-3 (3) IN § Ind. Code § 35-42-4-3 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CA 80 (1957–2026) TX 61 (1962–2025) IN 47 (1983–2020) IL 30 (1972–2024) OH 24 (1972–2025) MD 21 (1968–2011) FL 21 (1972–2026) OR 20 (1986–2026) MA 20 (1979–2025) NJ 20 (1961–2026) DC 19 (1978–2016) WV 18 (1985–2025) PA 14 (1877–2025) MI 14 (1984–2024) NY 12 (1977–2023) GA 11 (1982–2022) IA 9 (1995–2025) KS 8 (1982–2022) NH 8 (1977–2008) VA 8 (2001–2026) LA 8 (1995–2011) NM 8 (1954–2025) AZ 8 (1986–2021) WA 8 (1982–2024) VT 7 (1987–2025) WI 6 (1996–2024) CO 6 (1915–2025) DE 5 (2016–2024) MS 4 (1965–2010) MT 4 (1980–2015) NE 4 (2013–2020) NV 4 (1995–2021) MO 4 (1967–2005) CT 4 (1994–2011) NC 3 (1955–2016) WY 3 (1976–2023) ME 3 (2002–2010) AL 2 (1981–2017) TN 2 (1984–2015) AK 2 (1991–2023) UT 2 (1994–2016) SD 2 (1985–2024) KY 2 (1993–1997)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check