Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 New Mexico opinions name it 2 courts 1974–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Mexico courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Mexico. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Mexico. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Heien v. North Carolina
green
2 sentences2017Defendant couches his new argument as responding to the State's citation in its answer brief to Heien v. North Carolina , --- U.S. ----, 135 S.Ct. 530 , 190 L.Ed.2d 475 (2014), as support for the proposition that the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution permits investigatory traffic stops by officers based on mistakes of law. 2017Defendant couches his new argument as responding to the State's citation in its answer brief to Heien v. North Carolina , --- U.S. ----, 135 S.Ct. 530 , 190 L.Ed.2d 475 (2014), as support for the proposition that the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution permits investigatory traffic stops by officers based on mistakes of law. | 2 | 2017–2017 |
Colorado River Water Conservation District v. City & County of Denver Ex Rel. Board of Water Commissioners
green
1 sentence2021Colo. River Water Conservation Dist., 640 P.2d at 1143 . {48} Mendenhall for the first time applied the doctrine of relation to underground water sources through a court decision. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Elliott
green
1 sentence2006We therefore hold that because Rendall raised his conspiracy, RICO, and antitrust claims against Merrill Lynch for the first time at the hearing on the motion to compel arbitration, but did not at that time argue that those claims involving third parties were not subject to arbitration, he did not “specifically apprise} ] the trial court of the nature of the claimed error and invoke} ] an intelligent ruling thereon.” Id. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Shovelin v. CENTRAL NM ELEC. CO-OP.
green
2 sentences1995After reviewing other jurisdictions and authorities on the issue, we concluded that “administrative adjudicative determinations may be given preclusive effect if rendered under conditions in which the parties have the opportunity to fully and fairly litigate the issue at the administrative hearing.” Shovelin, 115 N.M. at 298 , 850 P.2d at 1001 . 1995After reviewing other jurisdictions and authorities on the issue, we concluded that “administrative adjudicative determinations may be given preclusive effect if rendered under conditions in which the parties have the opportunity to fully and fairly litigate the issue at the administrative hearing.” Shovelin, 115 N.M. at 298 , 850 P.2d at 1001 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
State v. Gunzelman
green
2 sentences1974State v. Gunzelman, 85 N.M. 295 , 512 P.2d 55 (1973). 1974State v. Gunzelman, 85 N.M. 295 , 512 P.2d 55 (1973). | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.