Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Alabama opinions name it 3 courts 1852–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Newhouse v. Miles
neutral
2 sentences1889It comes too late when taken for the first time at the hearing, and will be disregarded on appeal, if it does not materially affect the propriety of the decree. —Erwin v. Ferguson, 5 Ala. 158 ; Newhouse v. Miles, 9 Ala. 460 . 1852Newhouse et al. v. Miles, 9 Ala. Rep. 460 ; Watertown v. Connor, 4 Paige, 510 ; Story’s Eq. | 2 | 1852–1889 |
Miller v. Alabama
green
1 sentence2014“Miller established for the first time a requirement of individualized sentencing outside the death penalty context.” Craig, supra. Specifically, the Miller holding “mandates only that a sentencer follow a certain process ... before imposing a particular penalty.” — U.S. at -, 132 S.Ct at 2471 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Ex Parte Fort James Operating Co.
green
2 sentences2005In Fort James , this court issued a writ of mandamus ordering the trial court to set aside an order allowing an employee, one week before trial, to amend his complaint for the third time, thus "reviving a previously withdrawn claim for compensation for an impairment to his back and asserting for the first time a claim for compensation for impairment to his shoulder." Ex parte Fort James Operating Co. , 905 So.2d at 844 . 2005In Fort James, this court issued a writ of mandamus ordering the trial court to set aside an order allowing an employee, one week before trial, to amend his complaint for the third time, thus "reviving a previously withdrawn claim for compensation for an impairment to his back and asserting for the first time a claim for compensation for impairment to his shoulder." Ex parte Fort James Operating Co., 905 So.2d at 844 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Erwin v. Ferguson
neutral
1 sentence1889It comes too late when taken for the first time at the hearing, and will be disregarded on appeal, if it does not materially affect the propriety of the decree. —Erwin v. Ferguson, 5 Ala. 158 ; Newhouse v. Miles, 9 Ala. 460 . | 1 | 1889–1889 |
Jones v. Pope
neutral
1 sentence1880It could only be raised by plea in abatement, and is not available when presented for the first time on error. —Jones v. Pope, 6 Ala. 154 ; Kirkman v. Patton, 19 Ala. 32 ; Mahoney v. O’Leary, 34 Ala. 97 ; Dow v. Whitman, 36 Ala. 604 . | 1 | 1880–1880 |
Kirkman v. Patton
neutral
1 sentence1880It could only be raised by plea in abatement, and is not available when presented for the first time on error. —Jones v. Pope, 6 Ala. 154 ; Kirkman v. Patton, 19 Ala. 32 ; Mahoney v. O’Leary, 34 Ala. 97 ; Dow v. Whitman, 36 Ala. 604 . | 1 | 1880–1880 |
Mahoney v. O'Leary
neutral
1 sentence1880It could only be raised by plea in abatement, and is not available when presented for the first time on error. —Jones v. Pope, 6 Ala. 154 ; Kirkman v. Patton, 19 Ala. 32 ; Mahoney v. O’Leary, 34 Ala. 97 ; Dow v. Whitman, 36 Ala. 604 . | 1 | 1880–1880 |
Dow v. Whitman
neutral
1 sentence1880It could only be raised by plea in abatement, and is not available when presented for the first time on error. —Jones v. Pope, 6 Ala. 154 ; Kirkman v. Patton, 19 Ala. 32 ; Mahoney v. O’Leary, 34 Ala. 97 ; Dow v. Whitman, 36 Ala. 604 . | 1 | 1880–1880 |
Trustees of Watertown v. Cowen & Bagg
green
1 sentence1852Newhouse et al. v. Miles, 9 Ala. Rep. 460 ; Watertown v. Connor, 4 Paige, 510 ; Story’s Eq. | 1 | 1852–1852 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.