Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Ohio opinions name it 3 courts 1957–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. v. Home Indemnity Ins.green2 sentences2005Co. (1970), 23 Ohio St.2d 45 , the Supreme Court of Ohio addressed a situation in which the injured insured was entitled to liability coverage under two different policies, one of which contained an escape clause and the other of which contained an excess clause. 2001Co. (1970), 23 Ohio St.2d 45 , 52 O.O.2d 170 , 261 N.E.2d 128 , the general rule provides that — in cases involving two applicable insurance policies — where one policy contains an excess clause and the other policy contains an escape clause, the excess clause is given effect, and the policy containing the escape clause is held to provide the primary coverage. {¶ b} But, see, Monroe Guar. | 1 | 4 |
Engler v. Stafford, L-06-1257 (5-11-2007)green1 sentence2008See Engler v. Stafford , Lucas App. No. L-06-1257, 2007-Ohio-2256 ; Lighting Rod Mut. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Grasberger v. Liebert & Obert, Inc.
green
1 sentence1957Co., 103 Fed. (2nd) 345; Grasberger v. Liebert and Obert, Inc., 335 Pa. 491 , 6 A. (2d) 925. | 1 | 1957–1957 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.