6 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 1994–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Grant County Fire Protection District No. 5 v. City of Moses Lake
green
2 sentences2014No. 5 v. City of Moses Lake, 145 Wn.2d 702 , 731, 42 P.3d 394 (2002) (Grant 1). 5 Before beginning this analysis, it is important to recognize the breadth of the claim presented. 2014No. 5 v. City of Moses Lake, 145 Wn.2d 702 ,731, 42 P.3d 394 (2002) (Grant I). 5 ¶13 Before beginning this analysis, it is important to recognize the breadth of the claim presented. | 2 | 2014–2014 |
Grant County Fire Protection District No. 5 v. City of Moses Lake
green
2 sentences2014No. 5 v. City of Moses Lake, 145 Wn.2d 702 , 731, 42 P.3d 394 (2002) (Grant 1). 5 Before beginning this analysis, it is important to recognize the breadth of the claim presented. 2014No. 5 v. City of Moses Lake, 145 Wn.2d 702 ,731, 42 P.3d 394 (2002) (Grant I). 5 ¶13 Before beginning this analysis, it is important to recognize the breadth of the claim presented. | 2 | 2014–2014 |
Munns v. Martin
green
2 sentences2000To illustrate the breadth of this rule, we cited the fact that "[t]he mere nomination of a building for historic status was sufficient in First United Methodist to constitute an administrative burden." Munns, 131 Wash.2d at 207 , 930 P.2d 318 . 2000To illustrate the breadth of this rule, we cited the fact that “[t]he mere nomination of a building for historic status was sufficient in First United Methodist to constitute an administrative burden.” Munns, 131 Wn.2d at 207 . | 2 | 2000–2000 |
Miller v. Alabama
green
2 sentences2018The Washington Miller - fix statute addresses the foundational principle from Miller and the previous cases it built on-"that imposition of a State's most severe penalties on juvenile offenders cannot proceed as though they were not children." 567 U.S. at 474 , 132 S.Ct. 2455 . ¶ 50 Post - Miller , our constitutional analysis under Fain necessarily incorporates these considerations. 2018The Washington Miller - fix statute addresses the foundational principle from Miller and the previous cases it built on-"that imposition of a State's most severe penalties on juvenile offenders cannot proceed as though they were not children." 567 U.S. at 474 , 132 S.Ct. 2455 . ¶ 50 Post - Miller , our constitutional analysis under Fain necessarily incorporates these considerations. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Munns v. Martin
green
1 sentence2000To illustrate the breadth of this rule, we cited the fact that "[t]he mere nomination of a building for historic status was sufficient in First United Methodist to constitute an administrative burden." Munns, 131 Wash.2d at 207 , 930 P.2d 318 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
State v. Boland
green
2 sentences1994NOTES [1] State v. Boland, 115 Wn.2d 571 , 800 P.2d 1112 (1990) illustrates the breadth of analysis under factor four. 1994NOTES [1] State v. Boland, 115 Wn.2d 571 , 800 P.2d 1112 (1990) illustrates the breadth of analysis under factor four. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.