5 Iowa opinions name it 1 courts 1955–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Veal v. Stategreen2 sentences2010See Veal v. State, 779 N.W.2d 63, 65 (Iowa 2010). 2010See Veal v. State, 779 N.W.2d 63, 65 (Iowa 2010). | 2 | 2 |
Britven v. Occidental Insurancegreen1 sentence1979See Britven v. Occidental Insurance Co., 234 Iowa 682, 686-87 , 13 N.W.2d- 791, 794 (1944). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Canada
green
1 sentence1997In State v. Canada, 212 N.W.2d 430 (Iowa 1973), officers entered a hotel room occupied by the defendant pursuant to a warrant for his arrest. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Koonck v. Cooney
green
2 sentences1955A defendant could grant no such immunity, nor should he be able to do so to the end that many serious law violators may escape prosecution. *872 We considered the breadth of our immunity statute (section 622.16) in the recent case of Koenck v. Cooney, 244 Iowa 153 , 55 N.W.2d 269 , where Judge Hays points out the purpose of sections 622.14, 622.15 and 622.16. 1955A defendant could grant no such immunity, nor should he be able to do so to the end that many serious law violators may escape prosecution. *872 We considered the breadth of our immunity statute (section 622.16) in the recent case of Koenck v. Cooney, 244 Iowa 153 , 55 N.W.2d 269 , where Judge Hays points out the purpose of sections 622.14, 622.15 and 622.16. | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.