presumptive rule in Alabama

2002Ex parte Terry, 494 So.2d 628 (Ala.1986); Ex parte D.J., supra.” In Ex parte D.J., although the father of an illegitimate child knew of the child’s existence and had abandoned the child, our Supreme Court held that there had been no “voluntary forfeiture” for purposes of the natural father’s presumptive claim to custody.

2002Ex parte Terry, 494 So.2d 628 (Ala.1986); Ex parte D.J., supra ." In Ex parte D.J., although the father of an illegitimate child knew of the child's existence and had abandoned the child, our Supreme Court held that there had been no "voluntary forfeiture" for purposes of the natural father's presumptive claim to custody.

2002Ex parte Terry, 494 So.2d 628 (Ala.1986); Ex parte D.J., supra.” In Ex parte D.J., although the father of an illegitimate child knew of the child’s existence and had abandoned the child, our Supreme Court held that there had been no “voluntary forfeiture” for purposes of the natural father’s presumptive claim to custody.

2002Ex parte Terry, 494 So.2d 628 (Ala.1986); Ex parte D.J., supra ." In Ex parte D.J., although the father of an illegitimate child knew of the child's existence and had abandoned the child, our Supreme Court held that there had been no "voluntary forfeiture" for purposes of the natural father's presumptive claim to custody.

2017In Ming Wei Liu v. Board of Trustees of University of Alabama , 330 F.App'x 775 , 779 (11th Cir. 2009), the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit discussed Congressional intent in enacting the HCQIA, of which the reporting requirements of the NPDB are a part, writing: "Congress enacted the HCQIA to address the rising problem of medical malpractice and the ability of incompetent [health-care practitioners] to move between states without having their prior practice records follow them and to create a presumptive immunity from monetary damages awarded against participants in the

2009The Supreme Court of the United States has “clearly stated that the presumptive rule against warrantless searches applies with equal force to searches whose only defect is a lack of particularity in the warrant.” Groh v. Ramirez, 540 U.S. 551, 559 , 124 S.Ct. 1284 , 157 L.Ed.2d 1068 (2004).

2009The Supreme Court of the United States has “clearly stated that the presumptive rule against warrantless searches applies with equal force to searches whose only defect is a lack of particularity in the warrant.” Groh v. Ramirez, 540 U.S. 551, 559 , 124 S.Ct. 1284 , 157 L.Ed.2d 1068 (2004).

1845Rep, 153; 6 Ala. Rep. 248 .] The part payment by the principal of a promissory note, has been held to take it out of the statute of limitations, or to repel the presumptive bar arising from delay,in respect to the surety, who is jointly bound to pay it. [ 2 Pick.

1845Rep. 581 .] But the mere admission of the principal, after the statute has run, will not be received as evidence against the surety, to prevent its operation. [ 5 Binn.