5 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 2003–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Aljadir v. University of Pennsylvaniagreen1 sentence2003See Aljadir v. University of Pa., 547 F. Supp. 667 (E.D. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ross v. Union Pacific Railroad
green
2 sentences2024In affirming the dismissal with prejudice, the Ross court noted that the equitable-tolling doctrine had been applied only in limited circumstances, and late filings were not forgiven by the courts “where the fault for missing the statutory deadline is more directly attributable to the plaintiff.” 906 S.W.2d at 713 . 2024In affirming the dismissal with prejudice, the Ross court noted that the equitable-tolling doctrine had been applied only in limited circumstances, and late filings were not forgiven by the courts “where the fault for missing the statutory deadline is more directly attributable to the plaintiff.” 906 S.W.2d at 713 . | 2 | 2024–2024 |
Clouse v. Ngau Van Tu
green
1 sentence2017The circuit court granted UPRR’s motion to dismiss, finding the summons was fatally deficient but ordered the dismissal to be without prejudice based on the application of the Arkansas savings statute as espoused in Clouse v. Tu, 101 Ark. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Stracener v. Williams
green
1 sentence2008App. 208 , 137 S.W.3d 428 (2003) (plaintiffs could not prevail under prior law where they failed to amend their complaint after Clayborn within the one-year savings statute, and did not act diligently for purposes of the doctrine of equitable tolling). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.