Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Nevada opinions name it 1 courts 1983–2021 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nevada courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Copeland v. Desert Inn Hotelgreen2 sentences2011Copeland v. Desert Inn Hotel, 99 Nev. 823, 826 , 673 P.2d 490, 492 (1983) (“We therefore adopt the doctrine of equitable tolling . . . ; procedural technicalities that would bar claims . . . will be looked upon with disfavor.”); Lantzy v. Centex Homes, 73 P.3d 517, 523 (Cal. 2003) (“This court has applied equitable tolling in carefully considered situations to prevent the unjust technical forfeiture of causes of action . . . .”). 2011Copeland v. Desert Inn Hotel, 99 Nev. 823, 826 , 673 P.2d 490, 492 (1983) (“We therefore adopt the doctrine of equitable tolling . . . ; procedural technicalities that would bar claims . . . will be looked upon with disfavor.”); Lantzy v. Centex Homes, 73 P.3d 517, 523 (Cal. 2003) (“This court has applied equitable tolling in carefully considered situations to prevent the unjust technical forfeiture of causes of action . . . .”). | 2 | 2 |
State, Department of Taxation v. Masco Builder Cabinet Groupgreen2 sentences2021For example, in State, Department of Taxation v. Masco Builder Cabinet Group, this court affirmed a district court's decision to equitably toll the deadline under NRS 372.635 for a taxpayer refund claim. 127 Nev. 730, 738-40, 265 P.3d 666, 671-73 (2011). 2021For example, in State, Department of Taxation v. Masco Builder Cabinet Group, this court affirmed a district court's decision to equitably toll the deadline under NRS 372.635 for a taxpayer refund claim. 127 Nev. 730, 738-40, 265 P.3d 666, 671-73 (2011). | 1 | 1 |
Petersen v. Bruengreen2 sentences2021Compare Petersen, 106 Nev. at 274, 792 P.2d at 20 ("Under the discovery rule, the statutory period of limitations is tolled until the injured party discovers or reasonably should have discovered facts supporting a cause of action."), with Nicole B. v. Sch. 2021Compare Petersen, 106 Nev. at 274, 792 P.2d at 20 ("Under the discovery rule, the statutory period of limitations is tolled until the injured party discovers or reasonably should have discovered facts supporting a cause of action."), with Nicole B. v. Sch. | 1 | 1 |
Edwards v. Emperor's Garden Restaurantgreen2 sentences2021See Edwards v. Emperor's Garden Rest., 122 Nev. 317 , 330 n.38, 130 P.3d 1280 , 1288 n.38 (2006) (refusing to consider arguments that a party did not cogently argue or support with relevant authority). 5 cc: Hon. 2021See Edwards v. Emperor's Garden Rest., 122 Nev. 317 , 330 n.38, 130 P.3d 1280 , 1288 n.38 (2006) (refusing to consider arguments that a party did not cogently argue or support with relevant authority). 5 cc: Hon. | 1 | 1 |
Lantzy v. Centex Homesgreen1 sentence2011Copeland v. Desert Inn Hotel, 99 Nev. 823, 826 , 673 P.2d 490, 492 (1983) (“We therefore adopt the doctrine of equitable tolling . . . ; procedural technicalities that would bar claims . . . will be looked upon with disfavor.”); Lantzy v. Centex Homes, 73 P.3d 517, 523 (Cal. 2003) (“This court has applied equitable tolling in carefully considered situations to prevent the unjust technical forfeiture of causes of action . . . .”). | 1 | 1 |
Manke Truck Lines, Inc. v. Public Service Commissiongreen2 sentences2005We therefore affirm the district court’s order denying Seino’s petition for judicial review. 1 101 Nev. 122, 125 , 696 P.2d 462, 464 (1985). 2 Ruggles v. Public Service Comm’n, 109 Nev. 36, 40 , 846 P.2d 299, 301 (1993). 3 Manke Truck Lines v. Public Service Comm’n, 109 Nev. 1034, 1036 , 862 P.2d 1201, 1203 (1993). 4 State, Dep’t Mtr. 2005We therefore affirm the district court’s order denying Seino’s petition for judicial review. 1 101 Nev. 122, 125 , 696 P.2d 462, 464 (1985). 2 Ruggles v. Public Service Comm’n, 109 Nev. 36, 40 , 846 P.2d 299, 301 (1993). 3 Manke Truck Lines v. Public Service Comm’n, 109 Nev. 1034, 1036 , 862 P.2d 1201, 1203 (1993). 4 State, Dep’t Mtr. | 1 | 1 |
Ruggles v. Public Service Commissiongreen2 sentences2005We therefore affirm the district court’s order denying Seino’s petition for judicial review. 1 101 Nev. 122, 125 , 696 P.2d 462, 464 (1985). 2 Ruggles v. Public Service Comm’n, 109 Nev. 36, 40 , 846 P.2d 299, 301 (1993). 3 Manke Truck Lines v. Public Service Comm’n, 109 Nev. 1034, 1036 , 862 P.2d 1201, 1203 (1993). 4 State, Dep’t Mtr. 2005We therefore affirm the district court’s order denying Seino’s petition for judicial review. 1 101 Nev. 122, 125 , 696 P.2d 462, 464 (1985). 2 Ruggles v. Public Service Comm’n, 109 Nev. 36, 40 , 846 P.2d 299, 301 (1993). 3 Manke Truck Lines v. Public Service Comm’n, 109 Nev. 1034, 1036 , 862 P.2d 1201, 1203 (1993). 4 State, Dep’t Mtr. | 1 | 1 |
State Industrial Insurance System v. Partlow-Hurshgreen2 sentences2005We therefore affirm the district court’s order denying Seino’s petition for judicial review. 1 101 Nev. 122, 125 , 696 P.2d 462, 464 (1985). 2 Ruggles v. Public Service Comm’n, 109 Nev. 36, 40 , 846 P.2d 299, 301 (1993). 3 Manke Truck Lines v. Public Service Comm’n, 109 Nev. 1034, 1036 , 862 P.2d 1201, 1203 (1993). 4 State, Dep’t Mtr. 2005We therefore affirm the district court’s order denying Seino’s petition for judicial review. 1 101 Nev. 122, 125 , 696 P.2d 462, 464 (1985). 2 Ruggles v. Public Service Comm’n, 109 Nev. 36, 40 , 846 P.2d 299, 301 (1993). 3 Manke Truck Lines v. Public Service Comm’n, 109 Nev. 1034, 1036 , 862 P.2d 1201, 1203 (1993). 4 State, Dep’t Mtr. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Casarotto v. Mortensen
neutral
2 sentences1983See Hicks v. BHY Trucking, Inc., supra (summary judgment improper regarding timeliness of shipping claim); Casarotto v. Mortensen, 99 Nev. 392 , 663 P.2d 352 (1983) (dispute as to intent precludes summary judgment). 1983See Hicks v. BHY Trucking, Inc., supra (summary judgment improper regarding timeliness of shipping claim); Casarotto v. Mortensen, 99 Nev. 392 , 663 P.2d 352 (1983) (dispute as to intent precludes summary judgment). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.