5 Arizona opinions name it 2 courts 1990–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Airfreight Express Ltd. v. Evergreen Air Center, Inc.green1 sentence2021Id. at 110, ¶ 18 . | 1 | 1 |
Milligan Ex Rel. Milligan v. Big Valley Corp.green1 sentence1990See Colgan v. Agway, Inc., 553 A.2d at 146 ; Milligan v. Big Valley Corp., 754 P.2d 1063, 1068 (Wyo.1988). | 1 | 1 |
Jones v. Dresselgreen1 sentence1990See Jones v. Dressel, 623 P.2d 370, 378 (Colo.1981); Ciofalo v. Vic Tanney Gyms, Inc., 10 N.Y.2d 294 , 220 N.Y.S.2d 962, 965 , 177 N.E.2d 925, 926-27 (1961); Boll v. Sharp & Dohme, Inc., 281 A.D. 568 , 121 N.Y.S.2d 20, 22-24 (1953), aff'd, 307 N.Y. 646 , 120 N.E.2d 836 , 837 (1954). | 1 | 1 |
Boll v. Sharp & Dohme, Inc.green2 sentences1990See Jones v. Dressel, 623 P.2d 370, 378 (Colo.1981); Ciofalo v. Vic Tanney Gyms, Inc., 10 N.Y.2d 294 , 220 N.Y.S.2d 962, 965 , 177 N.E.2d 925, 926-27 (1961); Boll v. Sharp & Dohme, Inc., 281 A.D. 568 , 121 N.Y.S.2d 20, 22-24 (1953), aff'd, 307 N.Y. 646 , 120 N.E.2d 836 , 837 (1954). 1990See Jones v. Dressel, 623 P.2d 370, 378 (Colo.1981); Ciofalo v. Vic Tanney Gyms, Inc., 10 N.Y.2d 294 , 220 N.Y.S.2d 962, 965 , 177 N.E.2d 925, 926-27 (1961); Boll v. Sharp & Dohme, Inc., 281 A.D. 568 , 121 N.Y.S.2d 20, 22-24 (1953), aff'd, 307 N.Y. 646 , 120 N.E.2d 836 , 837 (1954). | 1 | 1 |
Colgan v. Agway, Inc.green1 sentence1990See Colgan v. Agway, Inc., 553 A.2d at 146 ; Milligan v. Big Valley Corp., 754 P.2d 1063, 1068 (Wyo.1988). | 1 | 1 |
Ciofalo v. Vic Tanney Gyms, Inc.green2 sentences1990See Jones v. Dressel, 623 P.2d 370, 378 (Colo.1981); Ciofalo v. Vic Tanney Gyms, Inc., 10 N.Y.2d 294 , 220 N.Y.S.2d 962, 965 , 177 N.E.2d 925, 926-27 (1961); Boll v. Sharp & Dohme, Inc., 281 A.D. 568 , 121 N.Y.S.2d 20, 22-24 (1953), aff'd, 307 N.Y. 646 , 120 N.E.2d 836 , 837 (1954). 1990See Jones v. Dressel, 623 P.2d 370, 378 (Colo.1981); Ciofalo v. Vic Tanney Gyms, Inc., 10 N.Y.2d 294 , 220 N.Y.S.2d 962, 965 , 177 N.E.2d 925, 926-27 (1961); Boll v. Sharp & Dohme, Inc., 281 A.D. 568 , 121 N.Y.S.2d 20, 22-24 (1953), aff'd, 307 N.Y. 646 , 120 N.E.2d 836 , 837 (1954). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Valhal Corp. v. Sullivan Associates, Inc., Architects, Planners, Engineers
green
1 sentence2008According to the Valhal court, an exculpatory clause immunizes a person from his or her own negligence, an indemnity clause holds that person harmless from such liability by requiring another to bear the damages awarded, and a limitation-of-liability clause places a cap on damages awarded against the negligent actor. 44 F.3d at 202 . 8 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Phelps v. Firebird Raceway, Inc.
green
2 sentences2008To be sure, Phelps referred in passing to the contractual provisions in SRP as involving “assumption of risk.” See id. at 413 ¶ 41, 111 P.3d at 1013 . 2008To be sure, Phelps referred in passing to the contractual provisions in SRP as involving “assumption of risk.” See id. at 413 ¶ 41, 111 P.3d at 1013 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Tunkl v. Regents of University of California
green
2 sentences2006As noted in Tunkl , "[w]hile obviously no public policy opposes private, voluntary transactions in which one party, for a consideration, agrees to shoulder a risk which the law would otherwise have placed upon the other party, the above circumstances [an exculpatory clause] pose a different situation.” 32 Cal.Rptr. 33 , 383 P.2d at 446 . 3 . 2006As noted in Tunkl , "[w]hile obviously no public policy opposes private, voluntary transactions in which one party, for a consideration, agrees to shoulder a risk which the law would otherwise have placed upon the other party, the above circumstances [an exculpatory clause] pose a different situation.” 32 Cal.Rptr. 33 , 383 P.2d at 446 . 3 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
People ex rel. Di Maggio v. Morhous
neutral
1 sentence1990See Jones v. Dressel, 623 P.2d 370, 378 (Colo.1981); Ciofalo v. Vic Tanney Gyms, Inc., 10 N.Y.2d 294 , 220 N.Y.S.2d 962, 965 , 177 N.E.2d 925, 926-27 (1961); Boll v. Sharp & Dohme, Inc., 281 A.D. 568 , 121 N.Y.S.2d 20, 22-24 (1953), aff'd, 307 N.Y. 646 , 120 N.E.2d 836 , 837 (1954). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Boll v. Sharp & Dohme, Inc.
neutral
1 sentence1990See Jones v. Dressel, 623 P.2d 370, 378 (Colo.1981); Ciofalo v. Vic Tanney Gyms, Inc., 10 N.Y.2d 294 , 220 N.Y.S.2d 962, 965 , 177 N.E.2d 925, 926-27 (1961); Boll v. Sharp & Dohme, Inc., 281 A.D. 568 , 121 N.Y.S.2d 20, 22-24 (1953), aff'd, 307 N.Y. 646 , 120 N.E.2d 836 , 837 (1954). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.