Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
62 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1953–2026 7 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Mayfair Fabrics v. Henleygreen2 sentences2010"For that reason, courts closely scrutinize liability releases and invalidate them if they violate public policy." Ibid. (citation omitted); see also Carvalho v. Toll Bros. and Developers, 143 N.J. 565, 578 , 675 A. 2d 209 (1996) ("[C]ourts will not enforce an exculpatory clause if ... exoneration of the party would adversely affect the public interest." (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); Mayfair Fabrics v. Henley, 48 N.J. 483, 487 , 226 A. 2d *698 602 (1967) ("[W]here there is unequal bargaining power, the public interest may call for rejection of an exculpatory clause exacted 2010“For that reason, courts closely scrutinize liability releases and invalidate them if they violate public policy.” Ibid, (citation omitted); see also Carvalho v. Toll Bros. & Developers, 143 N.J. 565, 578 , 675 A.2d 209 (1996) (“[Cjourts will not enforce an exculpatory clause if ... exoneration of the party would adversely affect the public interest.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); Mayfair Fabrics v. Henley, 48 N.J. 483, 487 , 226 A.2d 602 (1967) (“[WJhere there is unequal bargaining power, the public interest may call for rejection of an exculpatory clause exacted by the do | 3 | 9 |
Stelluti v. Casapenn Enterprises, LLCgreen2 sentences2026Undeniably, courts will not enforce "an exculpatory clause in which a commercial enterprise protects itself against its own negligence at the expense of a consumer, who had no bargaining power to alter the terms of the contract." Stelluti, 203 N.J. at 320-22 (surveying cases from other states striking down exculpatory clauses in lease agreements and A-3350-23 12 noted that each of them absolved the landlord of future acts). 2018Stelluti held that an exculpatory clause cannot extinguish a gross negligence claim against a health club. 203 N.J. at 312-13 , 1 A.3d 678 . | 3 | 5 |
Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.green2 sentences2026See e.g., Muhammad, 189 N.J. at 22 (declining to enforce an adhesion contract stemming from unequal bargaining power); Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc., 32 N.J. 358, 404 (1960) (declining to enforce an exculpatory clause within an automobile manufacturer's contract, as buyer had "no real freedom of choice," to enter into such); Vitale v. Schering-Plough Corp., 231 N.J. 234 (2017) (same); Vasquez v. Glassboro Serv. 2010Our Court did not permit an automobile manufacturer—through an exculpatory clause in a contract—to immunize itself for personal injury caused by a defective car in Henningsen, supra, 32 N.J. at 365-67, 404 , 161 A. 2d 69 , although building safer cars arguably might cost more. | 3 | 4 |
Gershon v. Regency Diving Centergreen2 sentences2025An exculpatory clause limiting liability is enforceable if: "(1) it does not adversely affect the public interest; (2) the exculpated party is not under a legal duty to perform; (3) it does not involve a public utility or common carrier; or (4) the contract does not grow out of unequal bargaining power or is otherwise unconscionable." Gershon v. Regency Diving Ctr., Inc., 368 N.J. 2021Because they are disfavored, the party seeking to enforce an exculpatory clause must show clearly that the party giving up the right to seek compensation from the alleged wrongdoer agreed to the exculpatory clause "voluntarily, intelligently and with the full knowledge of its legal consequences." Gershon v. Regency Diving Ctr., Inc., 368 N.J. | 2 | 6 |
Muhammad v. County Bank of Rehoboth Beach, Delawaregreen2 sentences2026See e.g., Muhammad, 189 N.J. at 22 (declining to enforce an adhesion contract stemming from unequal bargaining power); Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc., 32 N.J. 358, 404 (1960) (declining to enforce an exculpatory clause within an automobile manufacturer's contract, as buyer had "no real freedom of choice," to enter into such); Vitale v. Schering-Plough Corp., 231 N.J. 234 (2017) (same); Vasquez v. Glassboro Serv. 2024See Muhammad, 189 N.J. at 19 . | 2 | 2 |
Kuzmiak v. Brookchestergreen2 sentences2014Super. 381 (App. Div.), certif. denied, 60 N.J. 354 (1972) (finding an exculpatory clause, which attempted to immunize a residential landlord from negligence contrary to public policy); Kuzmiak v. Brookchester, Inc., 33 N.J. 2009See also Cardona v. Eden Realty Co., 118 N.J.Super. 381 , 288 A. 2d 34 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 60 N.J. 354 , 289 A. 2d 799 (1972) (finding an exculpatory clause, which attempted to immunize a residential landlord from negligence, contrary to public policy); Kuzmiak, supra, 33 N.J.Super. at 580-88 , 111 A. 2d 425 (nullifying a similar exculpatory provision in an apartment lease). | 1 | 12 |
James F. Walters v. Ymcagreen2 sentences2021A private gym cannot "insulate itself through an exculpatory clause from the ordinary common law duty of care owed by all businesses to its invitees." Walters v. YMCA, 437 N.J. 2017Such reliance is misplaced, because in Walters, supra, we held that "whether a fitness center or health club can insulate itself through an exculpatory clause from the ordinary common law duty of care owed by all businesses to its invitees, was specifically not addressed or decided by the Court in Stelluti." 437 N.J. | 1 | 4 |
Tunkl v. Regents of University of Californiagreen2 sentences2006The California Supreme Court’s decision in Tunkl v. Regents of the University of California, 60 Cal.2d 92 , 32 Cal.Rptr. 33 , 383 P.2d 441, 445-46 (1963), provides arguably the most widely accepted test applied to exculpatory agreements. 2006The California Supreme Court’s decision in Tunkl v. Regents of the University of California, 60 Cal.2d 92 , 32 Cal.Rptr. 33 , 383 P.2d 441, 445-46 (1963), provides arguably the most widely accepted test applied to exculpatory agreements. | 1 | 3 |
CARBONE v. Cortlandt Realty Corp.green2 sentences1997Carbone v. Cortlandt Realty Corp., 58 N.J. 366 [ 277 A.2d 542 ] (1971) (an exculpatory clause in a commercial lease should not be construed to exculpate a landlord unless the clause expressly so states or the intent to do so is evident from the arrangement of the parties); Kuzmiak v. Brookchester, 33 N.J.Super. 575 [ 111 A.2d 425 ] (App.Div.1955) (exculpatory clause in a residential lease that attempted to immunize landlord from liability for an wrongdoing held invalid). [Id, at 512, 515 A.2d 814 .] Though offered as a two-pronged test for unconscionability, the Tannock court analyzed the rela 1997Carbone v. Cortlandt Realty Corp., 58 N.J. 366 [ 277 A.2d 542 ] (1971) (an exculpatory clause in a commercial lease should not be construed to exculpate a landlord unless the clause expressly so states or the intent to do so is evident from the arrangement of the parties); Kuzmiak v. Brookchester, 33 N.J.Super. 575 [ 111 A.2d 425 ] (App.Div.1955) (exculpatory clause in a residential lease that attempted to immunize landlord from liability for an wrongdoing held invalid). [Id, at 512, 515 A.2d 814 .] Though offered as a two-pronged test for unconscionability, the Tannock court analyzed the rela | 1 | 3 |
Cardona v. EDEN REALTY CO., INC.green2 sentences2014Super. 381 (App. Div.), certif. denied, 60 N.J. 354 (1972) (finding an exculpatory clause, which attempted to immunize a residential landlord from negligence contrary to public policy); Kuzmiak v. Brookchester, Inc., 33 N.J. 2009See also Cardona v. Eden Realty Co., 118 N.J.Super. 381 , 288 A. 2d 34 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 60 N.J. 354 , 289 A. 2d 799 (1972) (finding an exculpatory clause, which attempted to immunize a residential landlord from negligence, contrary to public policy); Kuzmiak, supra, 33 N.J.Super. at 580-88 , 111 A. 2d 425 (nullifying a similar exculpatory provision in an apartment lease). | 1 | 2 |
HOJNOWSKI EX REL. HOJNOWSKI v. Vans Skate Parkgreen2 sentences2010"For that reason, courts closely scrutinize liability releases and invalidate them if they violate public policy." Ibid. (citation omitted); see also Carvalho v. Toll Bros. and Developers, 143 N.J. 565, 578 , 675 A. 2d 209 (1996) ("[C]ourts will not enforce an exculpatory clause if ... exoneration of the party would adversely affect the public interest." (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); Mayfair Fabrics v. Henley, 48 N.J. 483, 487 , 226 A. 2d *698 602 (1967) ("[W]here there is unequal bargaining power, the public interest may call for rejection of an exculpatory clause exacted 2009In any event, no one is asserting that ABI is still a party to the case. [4] Information regarding The President's Council on Physical Fitness and Sports is available at: http://www.fitness.gov. [5] See generally New Jersey Council on Physical Fitness and Sports, http://www.nj.gov/ health/fhs/njcpfs/index.shtm/ (discussing the importance of exercise in preventing diseases such as Type 2 diabetes). [6] We are not bound, at least in the particular context before us, by the panel's observation in Tessler, supra, 203 N.J.Super. at 485 , 497 A. 2d 530 , that "an exculpatory clause which bars suit f | 1 | 2 |
Boyd v. Smithgreen2 sentences1967In Boyd v. Smith, 372 Pa. 306 , 94 A. 2d 44 (Sup. Ct. 1953), a defendant landlord relied on an exculpatory clause in the lease as a defense to an action grounded on the failure to comply with a legislative mandate for tenfement fire escapes; in rejecting the defense, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court said: “Such a protective clause is undoubtedly valid and enforceable if it does not contravene any policy of the law, that is, if it is not a matter of interest to the public or the State but merely an agreement between persons relating entirely to their private affairs. 1967In Boyd v. Smith, 372 Pa. 306 , 94 A. 2d 44 (Sup. Ct. 1953), a defendant landlord relied on an exculpatory clause in the lease as a defense to an action grounded on the failure to comply with a legislative mandate for tenfement fire escapes; in rejecting the defense, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court said: “Such a protective clause is undoubtedly valid and enforceable if it does not contravene any policy of the law, that is, if it is not a matter of interest to the public or the State but merely an agreement between persons relating entirely to their private affairs. | 1 | 2 |
Freddi-Gail, Inc. v. Royal Holding Corp.green2 sentences1985Carbone v. Cortlandt Realty Corp., 58 N.J. 366, 368 (1971); Freddi-Gail v. Royal Holding Corp., 34 N.J. 1971Super. 110, 118 (App. Div. 1956), aff'd on other grounds, 24 N.J. 139 (1957); Freddi-Gail v. Royal Holding Corp., 34 N.J. | 1 | 2 |
| Synnex Corp. v. ADT SECURITY SERV. INC.green | 1 | 1 |
| Capital Safety, Inc. v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Carvalho v. Toll Bros. and Developersgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Hubner v. SPRING VALLEY EQUESTRIANgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Stelluti v. CASAPENN ENTERPRISESgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Norris v. Borough of Leoniagreen | 1 | 1 |
| Scully v. Fitzgeraldgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Russell v. Salem Transportation Co.green | 1 | 1 |
| Cardona v. Eden Realty Co., Inc.green | 1 | 1 |
| Tannock v. NJ Bell Telephone Co.green | 1 | 1 |
| Lee v. Allied Sports Associates, Inc.green | 1 | 1 |
| Sellon v. General Motors Corp.green | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Breakirongreen | 1 | 1 |
| United States v. Levingreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| McBride v. Raichle Molitor, USAgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Jadlowski v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATIONgreen | 1 | 1 |
| McBride v. Minstar, Inc.green | 1 | 1 |
| McBride v. Raichle Molitor, USAgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
ULTIMATE COMPUTER SERVICES, INC. v. Biltmore Realty Co.
neutral
2 sentences2010Ultimate Computer Servs., Inc. v. Biltmore Realty Co. Inc., 183 N.J.Super. 144 [ 443 A.2d 723 ] (App.Div.), certif. denied, 91 N.J. 184 [ 450 A.2d 522 ] (1982) (upholding an exculpatory clause limited to commercial tenancies). [Gershon v. Regency Diving Ctr., Inc., 368 N.J.Super 237, 247, 845 A.2d 720 (App.Div.2004).] See also Restatement (Second) of Torts § 496B comment c (1965). 2010Ultimate Computer Servs., Inc. v. Biltmore Realty Co. Inc., 183 N.J.Super. 144 [ 443 A. 2d 723 ] (App. Div.), certif. denied, 91 N.J. 184 [ 450 A. 2d 522 ] (1982) (upholding an exculpatory clause limited to commercial tenancies). [ Gershon v. Regency Diving Ctr., Inc., 368 N.J.Super. 237, 247 , 845 A. 2d 720 (App.Div.2004).] See also Restatement (Second) of Torts § 496B comment c (1965). | 3 | 2004–2010 |
Ultimate Computer Services v. Biltmore Realty Co.
green
2 sentences2010Ultimate Computer Servs., Inc. v. Biltmore Realty Co. Inc., 183 N.J.Super. 144 [ 443 A. 2d 723 ] (App. Div.), certif. denied, 91 N.J. 184 [ 450 A. 2d 522 ] (1982) (upholding an exculpatory clause limited to commercial tenancies). [ Gershon v. Regency Diving Ctr., Inc., 368 N.J.Super. 237, 247 , 845 A. 2d 720 (App.Div.2004).] See also Restatement (Second) of Torts § 496B comment c (1965). 2010Ultimate Computer Servs., Inc. v. Biltmore Realty Co. Inc., 183 N.J.Super. 144 [ 443 A. 2d 723 ] (App. Div.), certif. denied, 91 N.J. 184 [ 450 A. 2d 522 ] (1982) (upholding an exculpatory clause limited to commercial tenancies). [ Gershon v. Regency Diving Ctr., Inc., 368 N.J.Super. 237, 247 , 845 A. 2d 720 (App.Div.2004).] See also Restatement (Second) of Torts § 496B comment c (1965). | 3 | 2004–2010 |
McCarthy v. National Ass'n for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc.
green
2 sentences2006McCarthy v. NASCAR, Inc., 48 N.J. 539, 543 , 226 A.2d 713 (1967) (citing Boyd v. Smith, 372 Pa. 306 , 94 A.2d 44, 46 (1953)). 2006McCarthy v. NASCAR, Inc., 48 N.J. 539, 543 , 226 A.2d 713 (1967) (citing Boyd v. Smith, 372 Pa. 306 , 94 A.2d 44, 46 (1953)). | 3 | 1997–2006 |
Lucier v. Williams
green
2 sentences2026Id. at 495 . 2009We reached a similar conclusion in Lucier, supra, 366 N.J.Super. at 493 , 841 A. 2d 907 , setting aside an exculpatory agreement that tried to cap a home inspector's monetary liability for his professional negligence. | 2 | 2009–2026 |
State v. Jolley
neutral
2 sentences2010Ultimate Computer Servs., Inc. v. Biltmore Realty Co. Inc., 183 N.J.Super. 144 [ 443 A.2d 723 ] (App.Div.), certif. denied, 91 N.J. 184 [ 450 A.2d 522 ] (1982) (upholding an exculpatory clause limited to commercial tenancies). [Gershon v. Regency Diving Ctr., Inc., 368 N.J.Super 237, 247, 845 A.2d 720 (App.Div.2004).] See also Restatement (Second) of Torts § 496B comment c (1965). 2010Ultimate Computer Servs., Inc. v. Biltmore Realty Co. Inc., 183 N.J.Super. 144 [ 443 A. 2d 723 ] (App. Div.), certif. denied, 91 N.J. 184 [ 450 A. 2d 522 ] (1982) (upholding an exculpatory clause limited to commercial tenancies). [ Gershon v. Regency Diving Ctr., Inc., 368 N.J.Super. 237, 247 , 845 A. 2d 720 (App.Div.2004).] See also Restatement (Second) of Torts § 496B comment c (1965). | 2 | 2010–2010 |
Vincitore v. New Jersey Sports & Exposition Authority
green
2 sentences2010As we have said, the Tort Claims Act "reestablished the general rule of immunity but created narrow exceptions to that rule." Vincitore, supra, 169 N.J. at 124 , 777 A. 2d 9 (citations omitted). 2010As we have said, the Tort Claims Act "reestablished the general rule of immunity but created narrow exceptions to that rule." Vincitore, supra, 169 N.J. at 124 , 777 A. 2d 9 (citations omitted). | 2 | 2010–2010 |
Marcinczyk v. Nj Police Training Commission
green
2 sentences2010Marcinczyk v. Police Training Comm'n, 406 N.J.Super. 608, 627-29 , 968 A. 2d 1205 (App.Div.2009). 2010Marcinczyk v. Police Training Comm'n, 406 N.J.Super. 608, 627-29 , 968 A. 2d 1205 (App.Div.2009). | 2 | 2010–2010 |
Tessler and Son, Inc. v. Sonitrol SEC. Systems of Northern New Jersey, Inc.
green
2 sentences2009In any event, no one is asserting that ABI is still a party to the case. [4] Information regarding The President's Council on Physical Fitness and Sports is available at: http://www.fitness.gov. [5] See generally New Jersey Council on Physical Fitness and Sports, http://www.nj.gov/ health/fhs/njcpfs/index.shtm/ (discussing the importance of exercise in preventing diseases such as Type 2 diabetes). [6] We are not bound, at least in the particular context before us, by the panel's observation in Tessler, supra, 203 N.J.Super. at 485 , 497 A. 2d 530 , that "an exculpatory clause which bars suit f 2009In any event, no one is asserting that ABI is still a party to the case. [4] Information regarding The President's Council on Physical Fitness and Sports is available at: http://www.fitness.gov. [5] See generally New Jersey Council on Physical Fitness and Sports, http://www.nj.gov/ health/fhs/njcpfs/index.shtm/ (discussing the importance of exercise in preventing diseases such as Type 2 diabetes). [6] We are not bound, at least in the particular context before us, by the panel's observation in Tessler, supra, 203 N.J.Super. at 485 , 497 A. 2d 530 , that "an exculpatory clause which bars suit f | 2 | 1994–2009 |
Chemical Bank of New Jersey National Ass'n v. Bailey
green
2 sentences2006Bank, N.A. v. Bailey, 296 N.J.Super. 515, 527 , 687 A.2d 316 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 150 N.J. 28 , 695 A.2d 671 (1997), and generally are valid and enforceable against individuals so long as the particular exculpatory clause does not involve a matter of public interest. 2006Bank, N.A. v. Bailey, 296 N.J.Super. 515, 527 , 687 A.2d 316 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 150 N.J. 28 , 695 A.2d 671 (1997), and generally are valid and enforceable against individuals so long as the particular exculpatory clause does not involve a matter of public interest. | 2 | 2002–2006 |
CHEMICAL BANK OF NEW JERSEY NATIONAL ASS'N v. Bailey
green
2 sentences2006Bank, N.A. v. Bailey, 296 N.J.Super. 515, 527 , 687 A.2d 316 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 150 N.J. 28 , 695 A.2d 671 (1997), and generally are valid and enforceable against individuals so long as the particular exculpatory clause does not involve a matter of public interest. 2006Bank, N.A. v. Bailey, 296 N.J.Super. 515, 527 , 687 A. 2d 316 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 150 N.J. 28 , 695 A. 2d 671 (1997), and generally are valid and enforceable against individuals so long as the particular exculpatory clause does not involve a matter of public interest. | 2 | 2002–2006 |
Erlich v. First Nat'l Bank of Princeton
green
2 sentences1996Hence, “the courts will not enforce an exculpatory clause if ... exoneration of the party would adversely affect the public interest.” Erlich v. First Nat'l Bank of Princeton, 208 N.J.Super. 264, 287 , 505 A.2d 220 (Law Div.1984). 1996Hence, “the courts will not enforce an exculpatory clause if ... exoneration of the party would adversely affect the public interest.” Erlich v. First Nat'l Bank of Princeton, 208 N.J.Super. 264, 287 , 505 A.2d 220 (Law Div.1984). | 2 | 1996–2004 |
McCarthy v. NAT. ASSOC. FOR STOCK CAR AUTO RACING
green
2 sentences1998Plaintiffs rely on McCarthy v. National Assoc. for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc., 87 N.J.Super. 442, 450 , 209 A.2d 668 (Law Div.1965), aff'd, 90 N.J.Super. 574 , 218 A.2d 871 (App.Div.1966), aff'd, 48 N.J. 539 , 226 A.2d 713 (1967), to argue that defendants could not invoke the release to discharge their statutory responsibilities. 1998Plaintiffs rely on McCarthy v. National Assoc. for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc., 87 N.J.Super. 442, 450 , 209 A.2d 668 (Law Div.1965), aff'd, 90 N.J.Super. 574 , 218 A.2d 871 (App.Div.1966), aff'd, 48 N.J. 539 , 226 A.2d 713 (1967), to argue that defendants could not invoke the release to discharge their statutory responsibilities. | 2 | 1994–1998 |
Swisscraft Novelty Co. v. Alad Realty Corp.
green
2 sentences1997Where the interpretation of exculpatory clauses are involved, [t]he central question is not whether the parties agreed to insure against loss the risks they severally assumed inter sese but, rather, whether they so clearly allocated the risks that each party knew, or should have known, the existence of its contingent liability and was thus placed in a position where it could protect itself against such loss by adequate insurance coverage or otherwise. [Swisscraft Novelty Co. v. Alad Realty Corp., supra, 113 N.J.Super. at 422 , 274 A.2d 59 .] “The scope and application of an exculpatory clause 1997Where the interpretation of exculpatory clauses are involved, [t]he central question is not whether the parties agreed to insure against loss the risks they severally assumed inter sese but, rather, whether they so clearly allocated the risks that each party knew, or should have known, the existence of its contingent liability and was thus placed in a position where it could protect itself against such loss by adequate insurance coverage or otherwise. [Swisscraft Novelty Co. v. Alad Realty Corp., supra, 113 N.J.Super. at 422 , 274 A.2d 59 .] “The scope and application of an exculpatory clause | 2 | 1994–1997 |
Ace Stone, Inc. v. Township of Wayne
green
2 sentences1976It said: "The admitted goal is to ascertain and effectuate the contemplation or common intention of the parties." 47 N.J. at 439 . *408 In the case at bar the State in effect contends that it has the right to mislead the contractor (albeit innocently), to have it rely upon its representations to its detriment, and then to avoid liability for the contractor's ensuing damage on the basis of the "no damage" clause. 1975Justice Jacobs there cited and discussed with apparent approval a number of cases "where the exculpatory clause was construed to be inapplicable to a situation where the contractor proceeded pursuant to the public agency's direction *304 but found that the site was not available to him because of the agency's failure to have the necessary right-of-way or easement." 47 N.J. at 435 . | 2 | 1975–1976 |
Psaty & Fuhrman, Inc. v. Housing Authority
green
2 sentences1975In rejecting this argument the court cited Psaty & Fuhrman, Inc. v. Housing Authority of City of Providence, 76 R.I. 87 , 68 A. 2d 32 , 10 A.L.R. 2d 789 (Sup. Ct. 1949), and quoted therefrom as follows: The contractor in effect argues that the clause under consideration means that the Authority is excusable for reasonable delay only. 1975In rejecting this argument the court cited Psaty & Fuhrman, Inc. v. Housing Authority of City of Providence, 76 R.I. 87 , 68 A. 2d 32 , 10 A.L.R. 2d 789 (Sup. Ct. 1949), and quoted therefrom as follows: The contractor in effect argues that the clause under consideration means that the Authority is excusable for reasonable delay only. | 2 | 1958–1975 |
Vitale v. Schering-Plough Corp.
green
1 sentence2026See e.g., Muhammad, 189 N.J. at 22 (declining to enforce an adhesion contract stemming from unequal bargaining power); Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc., 32 N.J. 358, 404 (1960) (declining to enforce an exculpatory clause within an automobile manufacturer's contract, as buyer had "no real freedom of choice," to enter into such); Vitale v. Schering-Plough Corp., 231 N.J. 234 (2017) (same); Vasquez v. Glassboro Serv. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
| Vasquez v. Glassboro Service Ass'n, Inc. green | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Marcinczyk v. STATE POLICE TRAINING COM'N
green
1 sentence2026Marcinczyk, 203 N.J. at 594-600 . | 1 | 2026–2026 |
| Loeb v. US Dept. of Interior green | 1 | 2012–2012 |
| State v. Moore green | 1 | 2010–2010 |
| Sunday v. Stratton Corp. green | 1 | 2010–2010 |
| Carton v. Continental Casualty Co. green | 1 | 2007–2007 |
| State v. Bowens green | 1 | 2006–2006 |
| McCarthy v. NAT. ASSOC. FOR STOCK CAR AUTO RAC. green | 1 | 1998–1998 |
| Bahrle v. Exxon Corp. green | 1 | 1998–1998 |
| Slowinski v. Valley Nat. Bank green | 1 | 1998–1998 |
| Bahrle v. Exxon Corp. green | 1 | 1998–1998 |
| Hy-Grade Oil Co. v. NJ BANK green | 1 | 1997–1997 |
| Tannock v. New Jersey Bell Telephone Co. green | 1 | 1997–1997 |
| HYGRADE OIL COMPANY v. New Jersey Bank green | 1 | 1997–1997 |
| Cormier v. CENT. MASS. CHAPTER OF NATL. SAFETY COUNCIL green | 1 | 1994–1994 |
| Johnson v. Cyklop Strapping Corp. green | 1 | 1994–1994 |
| Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United Ins. Co. green | 1 | 1994–1994 |
| Gonsalves v. Commonwealth green | 1 | 1994–1994 |
| Mellk v. Sarahson green | 1 | 1994–1994 |
| Natell v. HENLEY neutral | 1 | 1992–1992 |
| Cal. State Auto. Ass'n Inter-Insurance Bureau v. Barrett Garages, Inc. green | 1 | 1992–1992 |
| Kravitz v. Parking Service Co. green | 1 | 1992–1992 |
| In Re Jacob green | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| Doyle v. Ohio green | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.