Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 California opinions name it 1 courts 1987–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Crewsgreen2 sentences1999(See New York v. Harris, supra, 495 U.S. 14, 17-20 [ 110 S.Ct. 1640, 1642-1644 ] [“following a Payton violation, the principle incentive to obey Payton still obtains: the police know that a warrantless entry will lead to the suppression of any evidence found, or statements taken, inside the home.” (Italics added.)]; United States v. Crews (1980) 445 U.S. 463, 471, 474 [ 100 S.Ct. 1244, 1250, 1251 , 63 L.Ed.2d 537 ]; People v. Marquez (1992) 1 Cal.4th 553, 566-569 [ 3 Cal.Rptr.2d 710 , 822 P.2d 418 ].) Defendant also contends Grubensky’s entry was invalid because it did not satisfy the knock-no 1999(See New York v. Harris, supra, 495 U.S. 14, 17-20 [ 110 S.Ct. 1640, 1642-1644 ] [“following a Payton violation, the principle incentive to obey Payton still obtains: the police know that a warrantless entry will lead to the suppression of any evidence found, or statements taken, inside the home.” (Italics added.)]; United States v. Crews (1980) 445 U.S. 463, 471, 474 [ 100 S.Ct. 1244, 1250, 1251 , 63 L.Ed.2d 537 ]; People v. Marquez (1992) 1 Cal.4th 553, 566-569 [ 3 Cal.Rptr.2d 710 , 822 P.2d 418 ].) Defendant also contends Grubensky’s entry was invalid because it did not satisfy the knock-no | 2 | 2 |
People v. Marquezgreen2 sentences1999(See New York v. Harris, supra, 495 U.S. 14, 17-20 [ 110 S.Ct. 1640, 1642-1644 ] [“following a Payton violation, the principle incentive to obey Payton still obtains: the police know that a warrantless entry will lead to the suppression of any evidence found, or statements taken, inside the home.” (Italics added.)]; United States v. Crews (1980) 445 U.S. 463, 471, 474 [ 100 S.Ct. 1244, 1250, 1251 , 63 L.Ed.2d 537 ]; People v. Marquez (1992) 1 Cal.4th 553, 566-569 [ 3 Cal.Rptr.2d 710 , 822 P.2d 418 ].) Defendant also contends Grubensky’s entry was invalid because it did not satisfy the knock-no 1999(See New York v. Harris, supra, 495 U.S. 14, 17-20 [ 110 S.Ct. 1640, 1642-1644 ] [“following a Payton violation, the principle incentive to obey Payton still obtains: the police know that a warrantless entry will lead to the suppression of any evidence found, or statements taken, inside the home.” (Italics added.)]; United States v. Crews (1980) 445 U.S. 463, 471, 474 [ 100 S.Ct. 1244, 1250, 1251 , 63 L.Ed.2d 537 ]; People v. Marquez (1992) 1 Cal.4th 553, 566-569 [ 3 Cal.Rptr.2d 710 , 822 P.2d 418 ].) Defendant also contends Grubensky’s entry was invalid because it did not satisfy the knock-no | 1 | 2 |
New York v. Harrisgreen2 sentences1999(See New York v. Harris, supra, 495 U.S. 14, 17-20 [ 110 S.Ct. 1640, 1642-1644 ] [“following a Payton violation, the principle incentive to obey Payton still obtains: the police know that a warrantless entry will lead to the suppression of any evidence found, or statements taken, inside the home.” (Italics added.)]; United States v. Crews (1980) 445 U.S. 463, 471, 474 [ 100 S.Ct. 1244, 1250, 1251 , 63 L.Ed.2d 537 ]; People v. Marquez (1992) 1 Cal.4th 553, 566-569 [ 3 Cal.Rptr.2d 710 , 822 P.2d 418 ].) Defendant also contends Grubensky’s entry was invalid because it did not satisfy the knock-no 1999(See New York v. Harris, supra, 495 U.S. 14, 17-20 [ 110 S.Ct. 1640, 1642-1644 ] [“following a Payton violation, the principle incentive to obey Payton still obtains: the police know that a warrantless entry will lead to the suppression of any evidence found, or statements taken, inside the home.” (Italics added.)]; United States v. Crews (1980) 445 U.S. 463, 471, 474 [ 100 S.Ct. 1244, 1250, 1251 , 63 L.Ed.2d 537 ]; People v. Marquez (1992) 1 Cal.4th 553, 566-569 [ 3 Cal.Rptr.2d 710 , 822 P.2d 418 ].) Defendant also contends Grubensky’s entry was invalid because it did not satisfy the knock-no | 1 | 2 |
People v. Stronggreen1 sentence2023(Stats. 2022, ch. 58, § 10; People v. Strong (2022) 13 Cal.5th 698, 708, fn. 2 (Strong).) 1 Payton’s plea to manslaughter is no longer a barrier to relief under section 1172.6, and so the trial court erred in summarily denying Payton’s petition without appointing counsel. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Thornton
green
1 sentence2014(People v. Thornton, supra, 41 Cal.4th at p. 436 .) Even if we were to reach the merits of Payton’s claim, we would reject it. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
People v. Garcia
neutral
2 sentences1987In so holding we disagree with People v. Garcia (1982) 139 Cal.App.3d Supp. 1 [ 188 Cal.Rptr. 868 ]. 1987In so holding we disagree with People v. Garcia (1982) 139 Cal.App.3d Supp. 1 [ 188 Cal.Rptr. 868 ]. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.