statute makes requirement (Colorado) · Go Syfert
← Colorado issues

statute makes requirement in Colorado

5 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1915–2025 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Armour and Company v. Industrial Commission green
colo · 1962
2 sentences

1968However, the concept that a reasonable excuse must be one which is also legally sound was mentioned in Armour & Company v. Industrial Commission, 149 Colo. 251 , 368 P.2d 798 .

1968However, the concept that a reasonable excuse must be one which is also legally sound was mentioned in Armour & Company v. Industrial Commission, 149 Colo. 251 , 368 P.2d 798 .

31968–1968
Ranch O, LLC v. Colorado Cattlemen's Agricultural Land Trust green
coloctapp · 2015
1 sentence

2025Land Tr., 2015 COA 20, ¶ 30 ; see also § 38-35-109, C.R.S. 2024. ¶ 86 The statute makes an exception, though, if a person has notice of a claimed interest before they acquire their rights in the property.

12025–2025
People v. Jassino green
mich · 1894
1 sentence

1915It was said in Grondin v. Duluth S. S. & A. Railway Co., 100 Mich. 600 , 59 N. W. 230 : “It must therefore be held that at least as much of the track and grounds outside of the switches as is required and is in actual use for reaching these side tracks is a part of the station grounds, to which the statutory requirement to fence does not apply.

11915–1915

Where else courts name it

NY 17 (1911–2026) CA 10 (1892–2022) NC 9 (1904–2019) MO 9 (1893–2020) KS 8 (1895–2003) GA 6 (1898–2011) MD 5 (1947–2016) MI 5 (1888–2023) IN 5 (1984–2009) CO 5 (1915–2025) MT 4 (1909–1979) NE 4 (1891–1980) FL 4 (1983–2003) IL 4 (1924–2022) WA 3 (1911–1918) UT 3 (1972–2021) VA 3 (1996–1997) OK 3 (1914–2000) IA 3 (1895–1958) MN 3 (1984–1988) OR 3 (1937–1964) DE 3 (1921–1977) OH 2 (1943–2024) TX 2 (1945–1998) HI 2 (1889–2007) AL 2 (1941–1976) MS 2 (1961–2008) WI 2 (1866–1987) PA 2 (1923–1963) TN 2 (1925–1962)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check