5 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1994–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Johnson v. Palmagreen2 sentences2008“A causal connection may be established either indirectly by showing that the protected activity was followed closely by discriminatory treatment, or through other evidence such as disparate treatment of fellow employees who engaged in similar conduct, or directly through evidence of retaliatory animus directed against a plaintiff by a defendant.” (Emphasis in original; internal quotation marks omitted.) Johnson v. Palma, 931 F.2d 203, 207 (2d Cir. 1991). 2008“A causal connection may be established either indirectly by showing that the protected activity was followed closely by discriminatory treatment, or through other evidence such as disparate treatment of fellow employees who engaged in similar conduct, or directly through evidence of retaliatory animus directed against a plaintiff by a defendant.” (Emphasis in original; internal quotation marks omitted.) Johnson v. Palma, 931 F.2d 203, 207 (2d Cir. 1991). | 1 | 1 |
Pagano v. Ippolitigreen2 sentences2004See Pagano v. Ippoliti, 245 Conn. 640, 651-52 , 716 A.2d 848 (1998) (noting that even where there is error, it is harmless where it does not affect result). 2004See Pagano v. Ippoliti, 245 Conn. 640, 651-52 , 716 A.2d 848 (1998) (noting that even where there is error, it is harmless where it does not affect result). | 1 | 1 |
Cadle Co. v. Gabelgreen2 sentences2004See Cadle Co. v. Gabel, 69 Conn. App. 279, 295 , 794 A.2d 1029 (2002). 6 In her brief, the plaintiff asserts that, “By precluding the jury from considering whether the [pjlaintiff took the toilet, the [pjlaintiff was prejudiced in attempting to prove that the [djefendant fail[ed] to offer a legitimate explanation for the [pjlaintiffs discharge.” The second step of the Ford test requires the defendant to “produc[e] evidence of a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for its actions.” Ford v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Connecticut, Inc., supra, 216 Conn. 53 -54. 7 Section 8-5 (1) of the Connecti 2004See Cadle Co. v. Gabel, 69 Conn. App. 279, 295 , 794 A.2d 1029 (2002). 6 In her brief, the plaintiff asserts that, “By precluding the jury from considering whether the [pjlaintiff took the toilet, the [pjlaintiff was prejudiced in attempting to prove that the [djefendant fail[ed] to offer a legitimate explanation for the [pjlaintiffs discharge.” The second step of the Ford test requires the defendant to “produc[e] evidence of a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for its actions.” Ford v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Connecticut, Inc., supra, 216 Conn. 53 -54. 7 Section 8-5 (1) of the Connecti | 1 | 1 |
Erwin M. Jennings Co. v. DiGenovagreen2 sentences1994See Jennings Co. v. DiGenova, 107 Conn. 491, 498-99 , 141 A. 866 (1928). 1994See Jennings Co. v. DiGenova, 107 Conn. 491, 498-99 , 141 A. 866 (1928). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Independence One Mortgage Corp. v. Katsaros
green
1 sentence2000The plaintiffs reliance on Independence One Mortgage Corp. v. Katsaros, supra, 43 Conn. App. 71 , to defeat Ford’s claim for priority is misplaced. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Doe v. Marselle
green
2 sentences1996Whether Ford's violation of § 36a-786 was "wilful" raises a genuine issue of material fact. "`Wilful' has been defined in many ways, and the applicable definition often turns on the specific facts of the case and the context in which it is used." Doe v. Marselle , 236 Conn. 845 , 851 , 675 A.2d 835 (1996). 1996Whether Ford's violation of § 36a-786 was "wilful" raises a genuine issue of material fact. "`Wilful' has been defined in many ways, and the applicable definition often turns on the specific facts of the case and the context in which it is used." Doe v. Marselle , 236 Conn. 845 , 851 , 675 A.2d 835 (1996). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.