Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
23 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1979–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Herzog v. Lexington Townshipgreen2 sentences2010As has been succinctly stated by the supreme court, “Evidence of post[ ] accident remedial measures is not admissible to prove prior negligence.” Herzog v. Lexington Township, 167 Ill. 2d 288, 300 , 657 N.E.2d 926, 932 (1995). 2010As has been succinctly stated by the supreme court, “Evidence of post[ ] accident remedial measures is not admissible to prove prior negligence.” Herzog v. Lexington Township, 167 Ill. 2d 288, 300 , 657 N.E.2d 926, 932 (1995). | 2 | 2 |
City of Chicago v. Scandia Books, Inc.green2 sentences2004See City of Chicago v. Scandia Books, Inc . 102 Ill. 2004See City of Chicago v. Scandia Books, Inc. 102 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
St. Therese Medical Center v. Hullgreen2 sentences2004See In re Albergo , 275 Ill. 2004See In re Albergo, 275 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
Lazenby v. Mark's Construction, Inc.green2 sentences2011Lazenby v. Mark's Construction, Inc., 236 Ill.2d 83, 100 , 337 Ill.Dec. 884 , 923 N.E.2d 735 (2010). ¶ 89 I. 2011Lazenby v. Mark's Construction, Inc., 236 Ill.2d 83, 100 , 337 Ill.Dec. 884 , 923 N.E.2d 735 (2010). ¶ 89 I. | 1 | 2 |
Cole v. Hoogendoorn, Talbot, Davids, Godfrey & Milligangreen2 sentences2009In addition to granting Ford’s motion for partial summary judgment, the February 19, 1999, order states, “[plaintiffs] complaint is dismissed, [plaintiff] is granted 28 days to replead only those claims pertaining to allegations of a defective drivers seatbelt.” An order dismissing a complaint is not final “unless its language indicates the litigation is terminated and the plaintiff will not be permitted to replead.” Cole v. Hoogendoorn, Talbot, Davids, Godfrey & Milligan, 325 Ill. 2009App. 3d 1152, 1153 , 759 N.E.2d 110, 112 (2001). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Norman v. Ford Motor Co.
green
2 sentences2009Norman v. Ford Motor Co., 160 Ill. 2009Norman v. Ford Motor Co., 160 Ill.App.3d 1037, 1041 , 112 Ill. | 2 | 2009–2009 |
Moser v. Ford Motor Company
neutral
2 sentences2005The court found Moser v. Ford Motor Co., 28 Fed. 2005The court found Moser v. Ford Motor Co. , 28 Fed. | 2 | 2005–2005 |
Dayan v. McDonald's Corp.
green
2 sentences2003App. 3d 972 , 466 N.E.2d 958 (1984), a case cited in Ford's brief, this court held that under the implied covenant of good faith that exists in all contracts, a franchisor may not terminate a franchise agreement except where good cause exists. 2003App. 3d 972 , 466 N.E.2d 958 (1984), a case cited in Ford’s brief, this court held that under the implied covenant of good faith that exists in all contracts, a franchisor may not terminate a franchise agreement except where good cause exists. | 2 | 2003–2003 |
People v. Ford
green
1 sentence2025The outcome of the trial could have reasonably differed had trial counsel admitted Hall’s statements for their truth. ¶ 96 Considering the totality of the evidence, the cumulative effect of these errors renders the result unreliable, depriving Ford of a fair trial under the standards enunciated in Strickland. ¶ 97 Reversed and remanded. - 21 - People v. Ford, 2025 IL App (1st) 231679 Decision Under Review: Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County, No. 20-CR- 03358; the Hon. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Modelski v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.
green
1 sentence2011Modelski, 302 Ill. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Piagentini v. Ford Motor Co.
green
1 sentence2009Piagentini II, 387 Ill. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
People v. Ford
green
2 sentences2009In fact, two of the three specific complaints the Ford defendant made were that the expert “could not make a comparison of the latent print and the standard while on the witness stand without a magnifying glass, and *** he did not have the print blown up to serve as a demonstrative exhibit.” Ford, 239 Ill. 2009In fact, two of the three specific complaints the Ford defendant made were that the expert "could not make a comparison of the latent print and the standard while on the witness stand *152 without a magnifying glass, and * * * he did not have the print blown up to serve as a demonstrative exhibit." Ford, 239 Ill. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Ford Ex Rel. Ford v. Nairn
green
2 sentences2001Ford v. Nairn, 307 Ill. 2001Ford v. Nairn, 307 Ill. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
In Re ALDRIDGE
green
1 sentence1995(Thoubboron v. Ford Motor Co. (D.C. 1993), 624 A.2d 1210 .) Thereafter, in January 1994, the Thoubboron trial court granted plaintiffs’ motion for voluntary dismissal without prejudice. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Oak Lawn Trust & Savings Bank v. City of Palos Heights
green
1 sentence1988Oak Lawn Trust & Savings Bank, 115 Ill. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Wolfe v. Ford Motor Co.
green
2 sentences1986The judge was in error in denying Ford’s motion for contribution on the ground that Donahue was not ‘jointly liable in tort’ within the meaning of G.L. c. 23IB, sec. 1(a).” Wolfe v. Ford Motor Co. (1982), 386 Mass. 95, 97-100 , 434 N.E.2d 1008, 1009-11 . 1986The judge was in error in denying Ford’s motion for contribution on the ground that Donahue was not ‘jointly liable in tort’ within the meaning of G.L. c. 23IB, sec. 1(a).” Wolfe v. Ford Motor Co. (1982), 386 Mass. 95, 97-100 , 434 N.E.2d 1008, 1009-11 . | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Porter v. Ford Motor Co.
neutral
2 sentences1983As stated, the appellate court affirmed the dismissal. 103 Ill. 1983As stated, the appellate court affirmed the dismissal. 103 Ill. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Buehler v. Whalen
green
1 sentence1982App. 3d 430,457-58 .) Nevertheless, the supreme court held that it was not error to give IPI Civil No. 5.01. ( 70 Ill. 2d 51, 68 .) This, of course, was despite the fact that the jury was not privy to the refused offer to prove that the excluded evidence was not unfavorable to Ford’s defense. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Sierens v. Clausen
green
2 sentences1979Stat. 1977, ch. 110, par. 48(1); Sierens v. Clausen (1975), 60 Ill. 2d 585 , 328 N.E.2d 559 .) However, even if Ford’s motion to dismiss were construed as having been brought pursuant to section 45, plaintiff’s prior sworn statements could nevertheless be considered, since they constitute binding judicial admissions, negating the possibility that plaintiff could prove that a protest and resulting breach of the peace occurred, and thereby negating the existence of a cause of action. 1979Stat. 1977, ch. 110, par. 48(1); Sierens v. Clausen (1975), 60 Ill. 2d 585 , 328 N.E.2d 559 .) However, even if Ford’s motion to dismiss were construed as having been brought pursuant to section 45, plaintiff’s prior sworn statements could nevertheless be considered, since they constitute binding judicial admissions, negating the possibility that plaintiff could prove that a protest and resulting breach of the peace occurred, and thereby negating the existence of a cause of action. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Yarc v. American Hospital Supply Corp.
green
1 sentence1979(See Yarc v. American Hospital Supply Corp. (1974), 17 Ill. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.