Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 1976–2003 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lesser v. Bridgeport-City Trust Co.
green
2 sentences2003Merritt-Chapman goes on to state: "In Lesser v. Bridgeport-City Trust Co., 124 Conn. 59 , 198 A. 252 , an action against a mortgagee who had foreclosed a mortgage secured by land and a building specially adapted for bowling alleys . . . the court stated the general rule (p. 64): "There is a strong tendency as between mortgagor and mortgagee to hold that such articles are a part of the realty whereas, in the case of landlord and tenant or other holder of a limited term, the tendency is the other way. 2003Merritt-Chapman goes on to state: "In Lesser v. Bridgeport-City Trust Co., 124 Conn. 59 , 198 A. 252 , an action against a mortgagee who had foreclosed a mortgage secured by land and a building specially adapted for bowling alleys . . . the court stated the general rule (p. 64): "There is a strong tendency as between mortgagor and mortgagee to hold that such articles are a part of the realty whereas, in the case of landlord and tenant or other holder of a limited term, the tendency is the other way. | 2 | 1976–2003 |
Lynch v. Davis
green
2 sentences1991In Lynch v. Davis, 181 Conn. 434 (1980), the court stated the general rule as follows: The statute requires that all such contracts, in the absence of extenuating circumstances such as part performance or reliance, be evidenced by a written memorandum stating the contract "with such certainty that its essentials can be known from the memorandum itself, without the aid of parol proof . . . and these essentials must at least consist of the subject of the sale, the terms of it and the parties to it so as to furnish evidence of a complete agreement." Id. at 438 . 1991In Lynch v. Davis, 181 Conn. 434 (1980), the court stated the general rule as follows: The statute requires that all such contracts, in the absence of extenuating circumstances such as part performance or reliance, be evidenced by a written memorandum stating the contract "with such certainty that its essentials can be known from the memorandum itself, without the aid of parol proof . . . and these essentials must at least consist of the subject of the sale, the terms of it and the parties to it so as to furnish evidence of a complete agreement." Id. at 438 . | 2 | 1990–1991 |
State v. Vieira
green
1 sentence2001In Vieira , the court stated the general rule in New Jersey was "the effect of defendant's plea on his immigration status has been considered a collateral consequence." Id. 842 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Pigeon v. Hatheway
green
1 sentence1991In Pigeon v. Hatheway, 156 Conn. 175 (1968), the court elaborated on this rule. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.