Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Delaware opinions name it 3 courts 2001–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Delaware courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Frye v. Commonwealthgreen1 sentence2025Evid. 803(8)(B)). 70 Frye v. Commonwealth, 345 S.E.2d 267, 280 (Va. 1986). 17 trustworthiness, like the fact that the record was shown to be regularly prepared and routinely relied upon by the Virginia State Police in the regular course of business.71 By contrast, in United States v. Hendricks, the Eleventh Circuit upheld the admission an NCIC report in the context of a supervised release revocation proceeding (where the Federal Rules of Evidence do not apply),72 but acknowledged that “an NCIC report is hearsay and does not fall within the Federal Business Records Act or any other recognized e | 1 | 1 |
State v. Sneedgreen1 sentence2025Evid. 803(8)(B)). 70 Frye v. Commonwealth, 345 S.E.2d 267, 280 (Va. 1986). 17 trustworthiness, like the fact that the record was shown to be regularly prepared and routinely relied upon by the Virginia State Police in the regular course of business.71 By contrast, in United States v. Hendricks, the Eleventh Circuit upheld the admission an NCIC report in the context of a supervised release revocation proceeding (where the Federal Rules of Evidence do not apply),72 but acknowledged that “an NCIC report is hearsay and does not fall within the Federal Business Records Act or any other recognized e | 1 | 1 |
Whittle v. Stategreen2 sentences2025There, the defendant challenged the admissibility of an NCIC printout identifying him as wanted.70 However, the Supreme Court of Virginia held it to be admissible under the business records exception due to practical necessity combined with other indicia of reliability and 66 Johnson, 813 A.2d at 165. 67 Morales, 133 A.3d at 532 (quoting Whittle, 77 A.3d at 248). 68 Johnson, 813 A.2d at 166. 69 894 F.2d 287, 289 (8th Cir. 1990) (determining admissibility under Fed. R. 2025There, the defendant challenged the admissibility of an NCIC printout identifying him as wanted.70 However, the Supreme Court of Virginia held it to be admissible under the business records exception due to practical necessity combined with other indicia of reliability and 66 Johnson, 813 A.2d at 165. 67 Morales, 133 A.3d at 532 (quoting Whittle, 77 A.3d at 248). 68 Johnson, 813 A.2d at 166. 69 894 F.2d 287, 289 (8th Cir. 1990) (determining admissibility under Fed. R. | 1 | 1 |
Cooper v. Commonwealthgreen1 sentence2025Evid. 803(8)(B)). 70 Frye v. Commonwealth, 345 S.E.2d 267, 280 (Va. 1986). 17 trustworthiness, like the fact that the record was shown to be regularly prepared and routinely relied upon by the Virginia State Police in the regular course of business.71 By contrast, in United States v. Hendricks, the Eleventh Circuit upheld the admission an NCIC report in the context of a supervised release revocation proceeding (where the Federal Rules of Evidence do not apply),72 but acknowledged that “an NCIC report is hearsay and does not fall within the Federal Business Records Act or any other recognized e | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Nick Cloyd Enterlinegreen2 sentences2025There, the defendant challenged the admissibility of an NCIC printout identifying him as wanted.70 However, the Supreme Court of Virginia held it to be admissible under the business records exception due to practical necessity combined with other indicia of reliability and 66 Johnson, 813 A.2d at 165. 67 Morales, 133 A.3d at 532 (quoting Whittle, 77 A.3d at 248). 68 Johnson, 813 A.2d at 166. 69 894 F.2d 287, 289 (8th Cir. 1990) (determining admissibility under Fed. R. 2025There, the defendant challenged the admissibility of an NCIC printout identifying him as wanted.70 However, the Supreme Court of Virginia held it to be admissible under the business records exception due to practical necessity combined with other indicia of reliability and 66 Johnson, 813 A.2d at 165. 67 Morales, 133 A.3d at 532 (quoting Whittle, 77 A.3d at 248). 68 Johnson, 813 A.2d at 166. 69 894 F.2d 287, 289 (8th Cir. 1990) (determining admissibility under Fed. R. | 1 | 1 |
MAULO v. Stategreen2 sentences2025Apr. 3, 2014) (TABLE) (calibration records “can be introduced through the business records exception to the hearsay rule.”). 105 See Maulo v. State, 27 A.3d 551 , 2011 WL 3849498, at *3 (Del. 2025Apr. 3, 2014) (TABLE) (calibration records “can be introduced through the business records exception to the hearsay rule.”). 105 See Maulo v. State, 27 A.3d 551 , 2011 WL 3849498, at *3 (Del. | 1 | 1 |
Ajinomoto Co., Inc., Plaintiff-Cross v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.green1 sentence2020The Report was submitted as an exhibit to the sworn affidavit of Melissa Barlow-Carey, a claims associate for Nationwide.22 Nationwide established, through the affidavit, that: (1) Barlow-Carey, as a claims associate covering the case, was familiar with the Report; (2) the Report was made close to the time of the events in question by someone with knowledge of the information contained in the Report, i.e., Roland; and (3) Nationwide regularly keeps a file containing such reports as part of its business practices.23 Moreover, these conditions were not contested by Plaintiffs in their 20 Pls.’ M | 1 | 1 |
Indivior Inc. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, S.A.green1 sentence2020The Report was submitted as an exhibit to the sworn affidavit of Melissa Barlow-Carey, a claims associate for Nationwide.22 Nationwide established, through the affidavit, that: (1) Barlow-Carey, as a claims associate covering the case, was familiar with the Report; (2) the Report was made close to the time of the events in question by someone with knowledge of the information contained in the Report, i.e., Roland; and (3) Nationwide regularly keeps a file containing such reports as part of its business practices.23 Moreover, these conditions were not contested by Plaintiffs in their 20 Pls.’ M | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Robert Turner, United States of America v. Guinn Kellygreen1 sentence2001See United States v. Turner, 8th Cir., 189 F.3d 712, 719-20 (1999) ("If both the source and recorder of the information were acting in the regular course of the organization’s business, however, the hearsay upon hearsay problem may be excused by the business records exception to the rule against hearsay [in F.R.E. 803(6)]."); 3 Federal Rules of Evidence Manual 1673 (7th ed. 1998) ("If the reporter is operating under the same or similar "business” duty (i.e., duly to report accurately) as the recorder, then the risk of inaccuracy is substantially reduced — the same guarantees of reliability app | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Delaware. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Morales v. State
green
2 sentences2025There, the defendant challenged the admissibility of an NCIC printout identifying him as wanted.70 However, the Supreme Court of Virginia held it to be admissible under the business records exception due to practical necessity combined with other indicia of reliability and 66 Johnson, 813 A.2d at 165. 67 Morales, 133 A.3d at 532 (quoting Whittle, 77 A.3d at 248). 68 Johnson, 813 A.2d at 166. 69 894 F.2d 287, 289 (8th Cir. 1990) (determining admissibility under Fed. R. 2025There, the defendant challenged the admissibility of an NCIC printout identifying him as wanted.70 However, the Supreme Court of Virginia held it to be admissible under the business records exception due to practical necessity combined with other indicia of reliability and 66 Johnson, 813 A.2d at 165. 67 Morales, 133 A.3d at 532 (quoting Whittle, 77 A.3d at 248). 68 Johnson, 813 A.2d at 166. 69 894 F.2d 287, 289 (8th Cir. 1990) (determining admissibility under Fed. R. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts
green
1 sentence2014He further argued that the intoxilyzer evidence was hearsay and that the ‘Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, 557 U.S. 305 (2009). 2 Bullcoming v. New Mexico, 131 S. Ct. 2705 (201l). 3 803(6) exception to the hearsay rule3 (commonly referred to as the business records exception) was inapplicable because Sergeant Perna was not a qualified witness under the rule. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Bullcoming v. New Mexico
green
1 sentence2014He further argued that the intoxilyzer evidence was hearsay and that the ‘Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, 557 U.S. 305 (2009). 2 Bullcoming v. New Mexico, 131 S. Ct. 2705 (201l). 3 803(6) exception to the hearsay rule3 (commonly referred to as the business records exception) was inapplicable because Sergeant Perna was not a qualified witness under the rule. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.