plausible claim (Delaware) · Go Syfert
← Delaware issues

plausible claim in Delaware

5 Delaware opinions name it 2 courts 2014–2025 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Delaware courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

CaseFollowedCited
Purnell v. Stategreen
del · 2014 · cited in 1 Delaware opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025
1 sentence

2025In his affidavit, trial counsel explains his strategy in offering a more plausible defense at trial than the “unsupported allegations and speculation of Mr. Corbin set forth in a handwritten note.”10 “If an attorney makes a strategic choice after thorough investigation of law and facts relevant to plausible options, that decision is virtually unchallengeable.”11 10 D.I. 57, p. 6. 11 Green v. State, 238 A.3d 160 , 174 (Del. 2020) (citing Purnell v. State, 106 A.3d 337, 342 (Del. 2014)). 5 11.

11
Savor, Inc. v. FMR Corp.green
del · 2002 · cited in 1 Delaware opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022
1 sentence

2022Ronald Shaw v. New Castle County, 2020-0559-SEM August 10, 2022 Page 7 unless the plaintiff would not be entitled to recover under any reasonably conceivable set of circumstances susceptible of proof.31 “I need not, however, ‘accept conclusory allegations unsupported by specific facts or . . . draw unreasonable inferences in favor of the non-moving party.’”32 Although “[t]he Court will view pleadings filed by pro se litigants with forgiving eyes… proceeding pro se will not relieve Plaintiffs of their obligation to ‘allege sufficient facts to state a plausible claim for relief’ or ‘to present a

11
Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich Ltd.green
nysd · 2010 · cited in 1 Delaware opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020
2 sentences

2020A principal auditor’s control of its agent auditor must come in a more focused form.”148 In dismissing the vicarious liability claims against the international 144 Id. at *3 (citations omitted). 145 Id. 146 Id. at *4 (citations omitted). 147 Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich Ltd., 728 F. Supp. 2d 372, 460 (S.D.N.Y. 2010). 148 Id. at 459 (citing Star Energy, 2008 WL 5110919 , at *3). 39 accounting firm with respect to its member firms’ deficient audits, the court confirmed that “[a]llegations of generalized control are insufficient to state a plausible claim of coordinating-entity control over its m

2020A principal auditor’s control of its agent auditor must come in a more focused form.”148 In dismissing the vicarious liability claims against the international 144 Id. at *3 (citations omitted). 145 Id. 146 Id. at *4 (citations omitted). 147 Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich Ltd., 728 F. Supp. 2d 372, 460 (S.D.N.Y. 2010). 148 Id. at 459 (citing Star Energy, 2008 WL 5110919 , at *3). 39 accounting firm with respect to its member firms’ deficient audits, the court confirmed that “[a]llegations of generalized control are insufficient to state a plausible claim of coordinating-entity control over its m

11
Nemec v. Shradergreen
del · 2010 · cited in 1 Delaware opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016The Complaint Fails to Allege an Injury-in-Fact Sufficient to Confer Standing To invoke this Court’s jurisdiction, the Plaintiff must establish the elements of standing: (1) an injury-in-fact, (2) a causal connection between the injury and 11 Nemec v. Shrader, 991 A.2d 1120, 1125 (Del. 2010) (internal quotation marks omitted). 12 Id.; Cent.

11
Price v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.green
del · 2011 · cited in 1 Delaware opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
1 sentence

2014“A judge may consider documents outside of the pleadings only when: (1) the document is integral to a plaintiff‟s claim and incorporated in the complaint; or (2) the document is not being relied upon to prove the truth of its contents.”68 66 Price v. E.I. duPont de Nemours & Co., Inc., 26 A.3d 162, 166 (Del. 2011) (citing Clinton v. Enter.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Delaware. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Where else courts name it

IL 105 (1973–2026) MA 73 (1984–2026) PA 57 (2006–2026) NY 52 (1883–2025) AL 41 (1911–2018) CO 36 (2014–2026) CA 27 (1955–2026) OH 26 (1997–2026) TX 22 (1981–2024) LA 21 (1974–2024) DC 18 (1967–2025) NJ 12 (1985–2022) VI 12 (2011–2025) NE 9 (2016–2025) WA 9 (1996–2020) NC 8 (1969–2024) UT 8 (2006–2020) WI 5 (2014–2023) DE 5 (2014–2025) GA 5 (2017–2026) MI 4 (1975–2020) NM 4 (2001–2022) MO 4 (1905–2017) AZ 4 (2020–2025) TN 4 (1980–2013) ME 3 (1975–2013) HI 3 (2018–2021) MD 3 (2003–2009) CT 3 (1995–2016) OK 3 (2001–2013) IA 3 (2011–2024) NV 3 (1997–2021) WV 3 (2020–2020) KY 2 (1992–2021) ID 2 (1963–2012) MS 2 (2017–2020) FL 2 (1979–2016) MN 2 (2024–2025) RI 2 (2009–2014) SD 2 (2022–2026)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check