Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Utah opinions name it 2 courts 2006–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Utah courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Harline v. Barkergreen1 sentence2014See id. ("Harline's good faith reliance on [his counsel's] advice and preparation of the statement and schedules was a plausible defense in the bankruptcy discharge hearing."). | 1 | 1 |
Broderick v. Apartment Management Consultants, L.L.C.green2 sentences2013See Broderick, 2012 UT 17, ¶ 19 , 279 P.3d 391 . 6 . 2013See Broderick, 2012 UT 17, ¶ 19 , 279 P.3d 391 . 6 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Thomasgreen1 sentence2013An issue is inadequately briefed "when the overall analysis of the issue is so lacking as to shift the burden of research and argument to the reviewing court." State v. Thomas, 961 P.2d 299, 305 (Utah 1998). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Utah. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Salt Lake County v. Butler, Crockett & Walsh Development Corp.
green
2 sentences2014Corp., 2013 UT App 30 , ¶ 37 n. 5, 297 P.3d 38 (holding that the appellant "has not met its burden of persuasion on appeal by adequately briefing a plausible claim"). 2014Corp., 2013 UT App 30 , ¶ 37 n. 5, 297 P.3d 38 (holding that the appellant "has not met its burden of persuasion on appeal by adequately briefing a plausible claim"). | 2 | 2014–2014 |
Haynes v. Dept. of Public Safety
green
1 sentence2020If, on the other hand, Haynes’s interpretation of the term “Brady/Giglio determination” is ultimately found to be the one intended by the parties, Haynes would then be entitled to an opportunity to demonstrate that obtaining an email from the DA stating that it had “not made a determination that Haynes is ‘Brady/Giglio impaired’” constitutes substantial compliance with his obligations under the settlement agreement. 20180752-CA 7 2020 UT App 19 Haynes v. Dep’t of Public Safety CONCLUSION ¶12 The materials before the district court demonstrate a plausible claim of ambiguity that is supported by | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Wilson v. Johnson
neutral
2 sentences2018Specifically, the signed MOU states that the parties "have now settled and compromised their claims and negotiated a resolution of their dispute ... through the following terms." Extrinsic evidence that ACC did not want to enter into a final settlement agreement at mediation "may not be used to contradict the plain language of the contract." Wilson , 2010 UT App 137 , ¶ 8, 234 P.3d 1156 . 2018Specifically, the signed MOU states that the parties "have now settled and compromised their claims and negotiated a resolution of their dispute ... through the following terms." Extrinsic evidence that ACC did not want to enter into a final settlement agreement at mediation "may not be used to contradict the plain language of the contract." Wilson , 2010 UT App 137 , ¶ 8, 234 P.3d 1156 . | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Allen v. Friel
green
2 sentences2014"An appellate court is not a depository in which [a party] may dump the burden of argument and research." Allen v. Friel, 2008 UT 56, ¶ 9 , 194 P.3d 903 (alteration in original) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). 2014"An appellate court is not a depository in which [a party] may dump the burden of argument and research." Allen v. Friel, 2008 UT 56, ¶ 9 , 194 P.3d 903 (alteration in original) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Hutter v. Dig-It, Inc.
green
1 sentence2014For purposes of a summary proceeding under the Wrongful Lien Act, Sumsion has a plausible claim that (1) Bay Harbor was his client and (2) Bay Harbor's farm property was "the subject of or connected with work performed for the client." 3 See id. € 14 First, Sumsion apparently understood that he was performing work for Bay Harbor as well as for Proctor individually. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Clayton
green
1 sentence2006We therefore evaluate Dr. France’s testimony under the standard set forth in Clayton : “[T]he witness may base his opinion on reports, writings[,] or observations not in evidence which were made or compiled by others, so long as they are of a type reasonably relied upon by experts in that particular field.” 646 P.2d at 726 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.