Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1980–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Alvarez v. Stategreen2 sentences2001C.F. relies on Alvarez v. State, 515 So.2d 286, 288 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), in which we held that, where a Fourth Amendment violation is alleged as to consent, the state must not only prove consent, but must also show such consent was freely and voluntarily given. 2001C.F. relies on Alvarez v. State, 515 So.2d 286, 288 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), in which we held that, where a Fourth Amendment violation is alleged as to consent, the state must not only prove consent, but must also show such consent was freely and voluntarily given. | 2 | 2 |
State v. Hallgreen1 sentence2001See Hall, 537 So.2d at 172-73 ; Morales v. State, 557 So.2d 893 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
and SC14-826 State of Florida v. Michael Lindsey McAdams and Michael Lindsey McAdams v. State of Florida
green
1 sentence2018An attorney was retained for Mr. Baskin and wanted to talk to him, the police were aware of it before they questioned Mr. Baskin, and the attorney provided a business card to the nurse at the hospital so that there was a 1McAdams also addressed errors associated with the failure to give Miranda warnings in a custodial situation, 193 So. 3d at 830-45 , an issue we need not discuss because we reverse based on McAdams' holding regarding the failure to inform Mr. Baskin that he had counsel. -7- means for the police to get Mr. Baskin in contact with him. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Morales v. State
green
1 sentence2001See Hall, 537 So.2d at 172-73 ; Morales v. State, 557 So.2d 893 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
United States v. Mandujano
green
2 sentences1980In United States v. Mandujano, 425 U.S. 564 , 96 S.Ct. 1768 , 48 L.Ed. 212 (1976), the United States Supreme Court held that the failure to give Miranda warnings to a witness called to testify before the grand jury concerning criminal activities in which he may have been involved does not insulate him from a perjury prosecution. 1980In United States v. Mandujano, 425 U.S. 564 , 96 S.Ct. 1768 , 48 L.Ed. 212 (1976), the United States Supreme Court held that the failure to give Miranda warnings to a witness called to testify before the grand jury concerning criminal activities in which he may have been involved does not insulate him from a perjury prosecution. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.