Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jones v. Stategreen2 sentences2004Oregon v. Elstad, 470 U.S. 298, 314 , 105 S.Ct. 1285, 1296 , 84 L.Ed.2d 222 (1985); Jones v. State, 119 S.W.3d 766, 773 (Tex. Crim. 2004Oregon v. Elstad, 470 U.S. 298, 314 , 105 S.Ct. 1285, 1296 , 84 L.Ed.2d 222 (1985); Jones v. State, 119 S.W.3d 766, 773 (Tex. Crim. | 3 | 3 |
Martinez v. Stategreen2 sentences2010See Martinez , 272 S.W.3d at 621–27. 3. 2010See Martinez, 272 S.W.3d at 621-27 . 3. | 2 | 2 |
Ex Parte Lewisgreen1 sentence2015App. 1987) (abatement for findings was appropriate in a case in which the appellant raised issues of both pure voluntariness and the failure to give Miranda warnings). 2 The doctrine of stare decisis requires us, at the very least, to “keep in mind the strong preference for adhering to past decisions[.]” Ex parte Lewis, 219 S.W.3d 335, 338 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Oregon v. Elstad
green
2 sentences2004Oregon v. Elstad, 470 U.S. 298, 314 , 105 S.Ct. 1285, 1296 , 84 L.Ed.2d 222 (1985); Jones v. State, 119 S.W.3d 766, 773 (Tex. Crim. 2004Oregon v. Elstad, 470 U.S. 298, 314 , 105 S.Ct. 1285, 1296 , 84 L.Ed.2d 222 (1985); Jones v. State, 119 S.W.3d 766, 773 (Tex. Crim. | 3 | 2004–2004 |
Parks v. State
green
1 sentence1987Cf. Parks v. State, 666 S.W.2d 597 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1984, no pet.). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Rodriguez v. State
green
2 sentences1985In Rodriguez v. State, 631 S.W.2d 515 (Tex.Crim.App.1982), the court applied this reasoning and ruled that, because taking a breathalyzer test was not protected testimonial communication, the failure to give Miranda warnings or statutory warnings, Tex. Code Crim.P.Ann. art. 38.22 (Vernon 1979), did not make evidence of breath-test results inadmissible at trial, where there was no evidence that the accused refused to take, the test. 631 S.W.2d at 517 . 1985In Rodriguez v. State, 631 S.W.2d 515 (Tex.Crim.App.1982), the court applied this reasoning and ruled that, because taking a breathalyzer test was not protected testimonial communication, the failure to give Miranda warnings or statutory warnings, Tex. Code Crim.P.Ann. art. 38.22 (Vernon 1979), did not make evidence of breath-test results inadmissible at trial, where there was no evidence that the accused refused to take, the test. 631 S.W.2d at 517 . | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Kirby v. Illinois
green
2 sentences1985The constitutional right to assistance of counsel attaches when adversary judicial proceedings are initiated against an accused, Kirby v. Illinois, 406 U.S. 682 , 92 S.Ct. 1877 , 32 L.Ed.2d 411 (1972), and the government has committed itself to prosecute. 406 U.S. at 689 , 92 S.Ct. at 1882 . 1985The constitutional right to assistance of counsel attaches when adversary judicial proceedings are initiated against an accused, Kirby v. Illinois, 406 U.S. 682 , 92 S.Ct. 1877 , 32 L.Ed.2d 411 (1972), and the government has committed itself to prosecute. 406 U.S. at 689 , 92 S.Ct. at 1882 . | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.