Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Virginia opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Sellers v. Commonwealthgreen1 sentence2014See id. at 276, 584 S.E.2d at 457 . 4 . | 1 | 1 |
California v. Behelergreen1 sentence1998When determining whether a suspect is "in custody" for Miranda purposes, "the ultimate inquiry is simply whether there is a 'formal arrest or restraint on freedom of movement' of the degree associated with a formal arrest." California v. Beheler, 463 U.S. 1121, 1125 (1983) (per curiam) (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Williamsgreen2 sentences1986Compare People v. Thomas, 12 Cal. App. 3d 1102 , 91 Cal. Rptr. 867 (1970) with State v. Williams, 248 Or. 85 , 432 P.2d 679 (1967). 1986Compare People v. Thomas, 12 Cal. App. 3d 1102 , 91 Cal. Rptr. 867 (1970) with State v. Williams, 248 Or. 85 , 432 P.2d 679 (1967). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Thomasgreen2 sentences1986Compare People v. Thomas, 12 Cal. App. 3d 1102 , 91 Cal. Rptr. 867 (1970) with State v. Williams, 248 Or. 85 , 432 P.2d 679 (1967). 1986Compare People v. Thomas, 12 Cal. App. 3d 1102 , 91 Cal. Rptr. 867 (1970) with State v. Williams, 248 Or. 85 , 432 P.2d 679 (1967). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Dixon v. Com.
green
1 sentence2010The failure to give Miranda warnings prior to custodial interrogation violates an individual’s constitutional rights under the Fifth Amendment; therefore, “[s]tatements obtained by law enforcement officers in violation of [the Miranda] rule generally will be subject to exclusion for most proof purposes in a criminal trial.” Id. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Miranda v. Arizona
green
2 sentences2003Id. at 479 , 86 S.Ct. at 1630 . 2003Id. at 479 , 86 S.Ct. at 1630 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.