43 Texas opinions name it 4 courts 1928–2022 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Nikolai v. Strategreen2 sentences2009See Nikolai , 922 S.W.2d at 236 ; Hotel Partners , 847 S.W.2d at 632 . 2002See Nikolai, 922 S.W.2d at 236 ; Hotel Partners, 847 S.W.2d at 632 . | 7 | 7 |
Fish v. Tandy Corp.green2 sentences2003Angelou v. African Overseas Union , 33 S.W.3d 269, 277 (Tex. App. C Houston [14th Dist.] 2000, no pet.); Fish v. Tandy Corp ., 948 S.W.2d 886, 892 (Tex. App. C Fort Worth 1997, writ. denied). 2000Id. | 5 | 6 |
Fuller v. Stategreen2 sentences2004Fuller v. State, 73 S.W.3d 250, 253 (Tex.Crim.App.2002). 2004Fuller v. State, 73 S.W.3d 250, 253 (Tex.Crim.App.2002). | 4 | 4 |
Hotel Partners v. KPMG Peat Marwickgreen2 sentences2009See Nikolai , 922 S.W.2d at 236 ; Hotel Partners , 847 S.W.2d at 632 . 2002See Nikolai, 922 S.W.2d at 236 ; Hotel Partners, 847 S.W.2d at 632 . | 2 | 6 |
In Interest of Ctgreen2 sentences2011See 749 S.W.2d at 215-16 . 2011See 749 S.W.2d at 215-16 . | 2 | 2 |
Daniels v. Stategreen2 sentences2001Daniels v. State, 30 S.W.3d 407, 408 (Tex.Crim.App.2000); see also Manuel v. State, 994 S.W.2d 658, 661-62 (Tex.Crim.App.1999). 2001Daniels v. State, 30 S.W.3d 407, 408 (Tex.Crim.App.2000); see also Manuel v. State, 994 S.W.2d 658, 661-62 (Tex.Crim.App.1999). | 2 | 2 |
Manuel v. Stategreen2 sentences2001Daniels v. State, 30 S.W.3d 407, 408 (Tex.Crim.App.2000); see also Manuel v. State, 994 S.W.2d 658, 661-62 (Tex.Crim.App.1999). 2001Daniels v. State, 30 S.W.3d 407, 408 (Tex.Crim.App.2000); see also Manuel v. State, 994 S.W.2d 658, 661-62 (Tex.Crim.App.1999). | 2 | 2 |
Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America v. Poolgreen2 sentences2015We construe this as a claim of adverse possession, as the only authority relied upon by Paul is Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America v. Pool, 124 S.W.3d 188 , 192–93 (Tex.2003), a case involving a claim of adverse possession of a mineral estate. 2005We construe this as a claim of adverse possession, as the only authority relied upon by Paul is Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America v. Pool, 124 S.W.3d 188, 192-93 (Tex.2003), a case involving a claim of adverse possession of a mineral estate. | 1 | 2 |
Butcher, Charles E. Iigreen1 sentence2022When the defendant challenges a factfinder’s failure to find in his favor on an issue on which he had the burden of proof in the trial, the negative finding relevant to the issue is reviewed in the defendant’s appeal by focusing on the evidence that favors the negative finding and disregarding the evidence contradictory to the finding unless it is evidence that a reasonable factfinder could not disregard. 11 To prevail in a case involving a challenge to a negative finding on which the defendant had the burden of proof, the defendant must demonstrate 8Id. 9Id.§ 19.02(a)(1). 10Id.§ 19.02(a)(2). | 1 | 1 |
Zuliani v. Stategreen1 sentence2021Zuliani v. State, 97 S.W.3d 589, 594 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. Mirandagreen1 sentence2015See Tex. Dep’t of Parks and Wildlife v. 4 Miranda, 133 S.W.3d 217 , 226–27 (Tex. 2004); Bland Indep. | 1 | 1 |
Jerry Alfred Futch, Jr. v. Baker Botts, LLPgreen2 sentences2014Futch v. Baker Botts, LLP, 435 S.W.3d 383, 391-92 (TexApp.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2014, no. pet. h.). 2014Futch v. Baker Botts, LLP, No. 14-12-00731-CV, 2014 WL 2583769, at *7 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] June 10, 2014, no. pet. h.). | 1 | 1 |
Johnson v. Odomgreen1 sentence2014Nonetheless, in a series of opinions, this court has adopted and applied an expansive interpretation of the doctrine articulated in the plurality opinion in Peeler . 10 See Meullion v. Gladden, No. 14-10-01143-CV, 2011 WL 5926676 , at *2-4 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] Nov. 29, 2011, no pet.) (mem. op.); McLendon v. Detoto, No. 14-06-00658-CV, 2007 WL 1892312 , at *1-2 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] Jul. 3, 2007, pet. denied) (mem. op.); Golden v. McNeal, 78 S.W.3d 488, 491-92 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2002, pet. denied); Johnson v. Odom, 949 S.W.2d 392, 393-94 (Tex.App.Houston [14th Dis | 1 | 1 |
Golden v. McNealgreen1 sentence2014Nonetheless, in a series of opinions, this court has adopted and applied an expansive interpretation of the doctrine articulated in the plurality opinion in Peeler . 10 See Meullion v. Gladden, No. 14-10-01143-CV, 2011 WL 5926676 , at *2-4 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] Nov. 29, 2011, no pet.) (mem. op.); McLendon v. Detoto, No. 14-06-00658-CV, 2007 WL 1892312 , at *1-2 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] Jul. 3, 2007, pet. denied) (mem. op.); Golden v. McNeal, 78 S.W.3d 488, 491-92 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2002, pet. denied); Johnson v. Odom, 949 S.W.2d 392, 393-94 (Tex.App.Houston [14th Dis | 1 | 1 |
Angelou v. African Overseas Uniongreen1 sentence2003Angelou v. African Overseas Union , 33 S.W.3d 269, 277 (Tex. App. C Houston [14th Dist.] 2000, no pet.); Fish v. Tandy Corp ., 948 S.W.2d 886, 892 (Tex. App. C Fort Worth 1997, writ. denied). | 1 | 1 |
Blankenship v. Stategreen2 sentences1999See Farris v. State, 819 S.W.2d 490, 496 (Tex.Crim.App.1990) (variance between indictment and proof of a name will not impugn conviction if names sound alike); see also Blankenship v. *626 State, 785 S.W.2d 158, 159-60 (Tex.Crim.App.1990) (evidence sufficient if proof shows that complainant was also "known by" name alleged in indictment). 1999See Farris v. State, 819 S.W.2d 490, 496 (Tex.Crim.App.1990) (variance between indictment and proof of a name will not impugn conviction if names sound alike); see also Blankenship v. State, 785 S.W.2d 158, 159-60 (Tex.Crim.App.1990) (evidence sufficient if proof shows that complainant was also “known by” name alleged in indictment). | 1 | 1 |
Farris v. Stategreen2 sentences1999See Farris v. State, 819 S.W.2d 490, 496 (Tex.Crim.App.1990) (variance between indictment and proof of a name will not impugn conviction if names sound alike); see also Blankenship v. *626 State, 785 S.W.2d 158, 159-60 (Tex.Crim.App.1990) (evidence sufficient if proof shows that complainant was also "known by" name alleged in indictment). 1999See Farris v. State, 819 S.W.2d 490, 496 (Tex.Crim.App.1990) (variance between indictment and proof of a name will not impugn conviction if names sound alike); see also Blankenship v. State, 785 S.W.2d 158, 159-60 (Tex.Crim.App.1990) (evidence sufficient if proof shows that complainant was also “known by” name alleged in indictment). | 1 | 1 |
Trimboli v. MacLeangreen1 sentence1995Trimboli v. MacLean , 735 S.W.2d 953, 955 (Tex. App.--Fort Worth 1987, no pet.). | 1 | 1 |
Carreon v. Moralesgreen2 sentences1994See Carreon v. Morales, 698 S.W.2d 241 (Tex.App.El Paso 1985, no writ). 1994See Carreon v. Morales, 698 S.W.2d 241 (Tex.App. — El Paso 1985, no writ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Caldwell v. City of Abilene
green
2 sentences2002We agree with the statement of our sister court in a similar case involving a challenge to an ordinance requiring some water customers to pay higher rates than others: "The interest and needs of the numerous water users served by a city are such that it is improbable, if not impossible, that any classification or rate basis could be devised which would not in some way discriminate against some users." Caldwell , 260 S.W.2d at 715 . 2002We agree with the statement of our sister court in a similar case involving a challenge to an ordinance requiring some water customers to pay higher rates than others: AThe interest and needs of the numerous water users served by a city are such that it is improbable, if not impossible, that any classification or rate basis could be devised which would not in some way discriminate against some users.@ Caldwell, 260 S.W.2d at 715 . | 3 | 2002–2002 |
Stephensen v. Wood
green
2 sentences1997Wood , 34 S.W.2d 246 (Tex. 1931), a case involving a challenge to fishing restrictions in certain coastal waters, for the proposition that natural resource preservation has statewide significance. 1997The Nature Conservancy also relies upon Stephensen v. Wood, 34 S.W.2d 246 (Tex. 1931), a case involving a challenge to fishing restrictions in certain coastal waters, for the proposition that natural resource preservation has statewide significance. | 2 | 1997–1997 |
Hudspeth v. Investor Collection Services Ltd. Partnership
green
1 sentence2018Id. at 478–79. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Kannankeril v. Terminix International, Inc.
neutral
1 sentence2015No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 26 Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment, 523 U.S. 83 (1998) 118 S.Ct. 1003 , 46 ERC 1097 , 140 L.Ed.2d 210 , 28 Envtl. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment
green
2 sentences2015No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 26 Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment, 523 U.S. 83 (1998) 118 S.Ct. 1003 , 46 ERC 1097 , 140 L.Ed.2d 210 , 28 Envtl. 2015No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 26 Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment, 523 U.S. 83 (1998) 118 S.Ct. 1003 , 46 ERC 1097 , 140 L.Ed.2d 210 , 28 Envtl. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Camp Mystic, Inc. and Richard G. Eastland, Natural Fountains Properties, Inc. v. S. Stacy Eastland, Nancy Eastland Leaton
green
2 sentences2014In Camp Mystic, Inc., this court considered an appeal of a trial court’s order granting a temporary injunction in a case involving a claim of breach of fiduciary duty. 399 S.W.3d at 270 . -5- 04-14-00436-CV In that case, a family restructured a company that owned and operated a summer camp for girls. 2014Id. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.
green
2 sentences2000Asahi, 480 U.S. at 106 , 107 S.Ct. 1026 . 2000Asahi, 480 U.S. at 106 , 107 S.Ct. 1026 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Martinez v. General Motors Corp.
green
1 sentence1987For a case involving a rule 21 notice complaint where the complaining party did not appear at the hearing, see Martinez v. General Motors Corp., 686 S.W.2d 349 (Tex.App. — San Antonio 1985, no writ). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Fronatt v. State
green
1 sentence1987Universal Amusement was quoted with approval in Fronatt v. State, 543 S.W.2d 140 (Tex.Cr.App.1976), a case involving a challenge to. the constitutionality of § 16.01. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Specia v. Specia
green
2 sentences1967We have been cited to Specia v. Specia, Tex.Civ.App., San Antonio, 292 S.W.2d 818 (writ ref. n. r. e.), which was a will contest, as authority for holding that this appeal has been perfected. 1967We have been cited to Specia v. Specia, Tex.Civ.App., San Antonio, 292 S.W.2d 818 (writ ref. n. r. e.), which was a will contest, as authority for holding that this appeal has been perfected. | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Mason v. Mason
green
2 sentences1967It is not a case involving the doctrine of virtual representation as applied in Mason v. Mason, 366 S.W.2d 552 (Tex. 1963). 1967It is not a case involving the doctrine of virtual representation as applied in Mason v. Mason, 366 S.W.2d 552 (Tex. 1963). | 1 | 1967–1967 |
| Texas Department of Public Safety v. Richardson green | 1 | 1965–1965 |
| Rowland v. Moore green | 1 | 1963–1963 |
| Muenster v. Tremont National Bank neutral | 1 | 1928–1928 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.