Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Hawaii opinions name it 1 courts 2002–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Hawaii courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Nicholsgreen2 sentences2013This was so because under State v. Valdivia, the failure to instruct on relevant attributes in a terroristic threatening case is reversible error in any event, whether or not the relevant attributes instruction is requested (as it was in Valdivia) or unrequested (as it was in Nichols). 95 Hawai'i 465, 479 , 24 P.3d 661, 675 (2001) (concluding that the omission of an instruction on relevant attributes was error because “the jury ... should have been instructed that it could consider relevant attributes of both the defendant and the [complaining witness] in determining whether the [complaining w 2013This was so because under State v. Valdivia, the failure to instruct on relevant attributes in a terroristic threatening case is reversible error in any event, whether or not the relevant attributes instruction is requested (as it was in Valdivia) or unrequested (as it was in Nichols). 95 Hawai'i 465, 479 , 24 P.3d 661, 675 (2001) (concluding that the omission of an instruction on relevant attributes was error because “the jury ... should have been instructed that it could consider relevant attributes of both the defendant and the [complaining witness] in determining whether the [complaining w | 2 | 2 |
State v. Valdiviagreen2 sentences2013This was so because under State v. Valdivia, the failure to instruct on relevant attributes in a terroristic threatening case is reversible error in any event, whether or not the relevant attributes instruction is requested (as it was in Valdivia) or unrequested (as it was in Nichols). 95 Hawai'i 465, 479 , 24 P.3d 661, 675 (2001) (concluding that the omission of an instruction on relevant attributes was error because “the jury ... should have been instructed that it could consider relevant attributes of both the defendant and the [complaining witness] in determining whether the [complaining w 2013This was so because under State v. Valdivia, the failure to instruct on relevant attributes in a terroristic threatening case is reversible error in any event, whether or not the relevant attributes instruction is requested (as it was in Valdivia) or unrequested (as it was in Nichols). 95 Hawai'i 465, 479 , 24 P.3d 661, 675 (2001) (concluding that the omission of an instruction on relevant attributes was error because “the jury ... should have been instructed that it could consider relevant attributes of both the defendant and the [complaining witness] in determining whether the [complaining w | 2 | 2 |
Amfac, Inc. v. Waikiki Beachcomber Investment Co.green2 sentences2006Co., 74 Haw. 85, 107 , 839 P.2d 10, 24 (1992), cited in Casumpang v. ILWU Local 112, 108 Hawai'i 411, 425 , 121 P.3d 391, 405 (2005); Arquero v. Hilton Hawaiian Village LLC, 104 Hawai'i 423, 433 , 91 P.3d 505, 515 (2004). 2006Co., 74 Haw. 85, 107 , 839 P.2d 10, 24 (1992), cited in Casumpang v. ILWU Local 112, 108 Hawai'i 411, 425 , 121 P.3d 391, 405 (2005); Arquero v. Hilton Hawaiian Village LLC, 104 Hawai'i 423, 433 , 91 P.3d 505, 515 (2004). | 1 | 1 |
Casumpang v. ILWU LOCAL 142green2 sentences2006Co., 74 Haw. 85, 107 , 839 P.2d 10, 24 (1992), cited in Casumpang v. ILWU Local 112, 108 Hawai'i 411, 425 , 121 P.3d 391, 405 (2005); Arquero v. Hilton Hawaiian Village LLC, 104 Hawai'i 423, 433 , 91 P.3d 505, 515 (2004). 2006Co., 74 Haw. 85, 107 , 839 P.2d 10, 24 (1992), cited in Casumpang v. ILWU Local 112, 108 Hawai'i 411, 425 , 121 P.3d 391, 405 (2005); Arquero v. Hilton Hawaiian Village LLC, 104 Hawai'i 423, 433 , 91 P.3d 505, 515 (2004). | 1 | 1 |
Arquero v. Hilton Hawaiian Village LLCgreen2 sentences2006Co., 74 Haw. 85, 107 , 839 P.2d 10, 24 (1992), cited in Casumpang v. ILWU Local 112, 108 Hawai'i 411, 425 , 121 P.3d 391, 405 (2005); Arquero v. Hilton Hawaiian Village LLC, 104 Hawai'i 423, 433 , 91 P.3d 505, 515 (2004). 2006Co., 74 Haw. 85, 107 , 839 P.2d 10, 24 (1992), cited in Casumpang v. ILWU Local 112, 108 Hawai'i 411, 425 , 121 P.3d 391, 405 (2005); Arquero v. Hilton Hawaiian Village LLC, 104 Hawai'i 423, 433 , 91 P.3d 505, 515 (2004). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Hawaii. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Aplaca
green
2 sentences2020Aplaca, 74 Haw. at 67 , 837 P.2d at 1305 . 2020Aplaca, 74 Haw. at 67 , 837 P.2d at 1305 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Clemente v. Carnicon-Puerto Rico Management Associates
green
2 sentences2002Clemente, 52 F.3d at 387 . 2002Clemente, 52 F.3d at 387 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.