5 Hawaii opinions name it 1 courts 1917–2006 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Hawaii courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Nakamura v. Stategreen2 sentences2004The words of the standard are taken directly from the text of HRS § 269-16, which pertains to energy rate adjustments and hence, were only intended to implement that statute. [2] See Kauai Elec., 60 Haw. at 181 , 590 P.2d at 534 ; Nakamura, 98 Hawai'i at 274-75 , 47 P.3d at 741-743 (Acoba, J., dissenting). 2004The words of the standard are taken directly from the text of HRS § 269-16, which pertains to energy rate adjustments and hence, were only intended to implement that statute. [2] See Kauai Elec., 60 Haw. at 181 , 590 P.2d at 534 ; Nakamura, 98 Hawai'i at 274-75 , 47 P.3d at 741-743 (Acoba, J., dissenting). | 1 | 1 |
Lum v. Sungreen2 sentences1999Id. at 295 , 769 P.2d at 1096 (alterations in original). 1999Id. at 295 , 769 P.2d at 1096 (alterations in original). | 1 | 1 |
Wells v. . Garbuttgreen1 sentence1917See also Wells v. Gar-butt, 132 N. Y. 430, 435 , where the court said, “As a grant- or cannot derogate from his own grant, while a grantee may take the language of the deed most strongly in his favor, the law will imply an easement in favor of a grantee more readily than it will in favor of a grantor, and this distinction explains many of the apparent inconsistencies in the reported cases.” “If there is a reasonable doubt as to the meaning of an exception in a lease, the words of the exception, being the words of the lessor, are to be construed favorably for the lessee, and against the lessor. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Hawaii. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Schaulis v. CTB/McGraw-Hill, Inc.
green
2 sentences2006However, the district court, by the words of the rule itself, retains discretion in determining whether or not to award costs.” 496 F.Supp. at 680 . 2006However, the district court, by the words of the rule itself, retains discretion *1228 in determining whether or not to award costs." 496 F.Supp. at 680 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
In Re Kauai Electric Division of Citizens Utilities Co.
green
2 sentences2004The words of the standard are taken directly from the text of HRS § 269-16, which pertains to energy rate adjustments and hence, were only intended to implement that statute. [2] See Kauai Elec., 60 Haw. at 181 , 590 P.2d at 534 ; Nakamura, 98 Hawai'i at 274-75 , 47 P.3d at 741-743 (Acoba, J., dissenting). 2004The words of the standard are taken directly from the text of HRS § 269-16, which pertains to energy rate adjustments and hence, were only intended to implement that statute. [2] See Kauai Elec., 60 Haw. at 181 , 590 P.2d at 534 ; Nakamura, 98 Hawai'i at 274-75 , 47 P.3d at 741-743 (Acoba, J., dissenting). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Davis v. Harrison
neutral
1 sentence1933See O’Neil v. Dreier, 61 Fed. (2d) 598; Hinds v. Hinds, 140 Atl. 189 ; Davis v. Harrison, 240 Fed. 97 ; 18 C. | 1 | 1933–1933 |
Hinds v. Hinds
green
1 sentence1933See O’Neil v. Dreier, 61 Fed. (2d) 598; Hinds v. Hinds, 140 Atl. 189 ; Davis v. Harrison, 240 Fed. 97 ; 18 C. | 1 | 1933–1933 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.