5 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1938–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. O'CONNELLgreen1 sentence2015In State v. O’Connell, 275 N.W.2d 197, 205 (Iowa 1979), the supreme court held direct and circumstantial evidence are equally probative for purposes of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Truesdellgreen1 sentence2015See also, e.g., State v. Truesdell, 679 N.W.2d 611, 616 (Iowa 2004) 1 We acknowledge that Creighton relies in part on an outdated rule relating to circumstantial evidence, stating, “The circumstantial evidence rule is subject to the caveat that it must be entirely consistent with defendant’s guilt and wholly inconsistent with any rational hypothesis of innocence.” 201 N.W.2d at 473 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Creightongreen1 sentence2015See also, e.g., State v. Truesdell, 679 N.W.2d 611, 616 (Iowa 2004) 1 We acknowledge that Creighton relies in part on an outdated rule relating to circumstantial evidence, stating, “The circumstantial evidence rule is subject to the caveat that it must be entirely consistent with defendant’s guilt and wholly inconsistent with any rational hypothesis of innocence.” 201 N.W.2d at 473 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Kaufmangreen2 sentences1979Although we have recently reaffirmed the cautionary provisions in the circumstantial evidence instruction, State v. Kaufman, 265 N.W.2d at 615, the rationale of these cases was not advanced there. 1979Although we have recently reaffirmed the cautionary provisions in the circumstantial evidence instruction, State v. Kaufman, 265 N.W.2d at 615, the rationale of these cases was not advanced there. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Petersongreen1 sentence1977State v. Ochoa, 244 N.W.2d 773, 777 (Iowa 1976); State v. Speck, 242 N.W.2d 287, 295 (Iowa 1976); State v. Peterson, 196 N.W.2d 436, 438-439 (Iowa 1972); State v. Post, 255 Iowa 573, 584 , 123 N.W.2d 11, 18 (1963); 23A C.J.S. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Ochoagreen1 sentence1977State v. Ochoa, 244 N.W.2d 773, 777 (Iowa 1976); State v. Speck, 242 N.W.2d 287, 295 (Iowa 1976); State v. Peterson, 196 N.W.2d 436, 438-439 (Iowa 1972); State v. Post, 255 Iowa 573, 584 , 123 N.W.2d 11, 18 (1963); 23A C.J.S. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Postgreen2 sentences1977State v. Ochoa, 244 N.W.2d 773, 777 (Iowa 1976); State v. Speck, 242 N.W.2d 287, 295 (Iowa 1976); State v. Peterson, 196 N.W.2d 436, 438-439 (Iowa 1972); State v. Post, 255 Iowa 573, 584 , 123 N.W.2d 11, 18 (1963); 23A C.J.S. 1977State v. Ochoa, 244 N.W.2d 773, 777 (Iowa 1976); State v. Speck, 242 N.W.2d 287, 295 (Iowa 1976); State v. Peterson, 196 N.W.2d 436, 438-439 (Iowa 1972); State v. Post, 255 Iowa 573, 584 , 123 N.W.2d 11, 18 (1963); 23A C.J.S. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Speckgreen1 sentence1977State v. Ochoa, 244 N.W.2d 773, 777 (Iowa 1976); State v. Speck, 242 N.W.2d 287, 295 (Iowa 1976); State v. Peterson, 196 N.W.2d 436, 438-439 (Iowa 1972); State v. Post, 255 Iowa 573, 584 , 123 N.W.2d 11, 18 (1963); 23A C.J.S. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Linkgreen1 sentence1972State v. Link, 171 N.W.2d 259, 260, 261 (Iowa 1969) and citations. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Lapoint
green
2 sentences1977State v. Lapoint, 87 Vt. 115 , 88 A. 523 ; 23A C.J.S. 1977State v. Lapoint, 87 Vt. 115 , 88 A. 523 ; 23A C.J.S. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Egbert v. State
green
1 sentence1938Appellee cites Egbert v. State, 76 Tex. Cr. | 1 | 1938–1938 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.