second assignment error in Iowa

1959Wright v. Reed, supra; Bohanan v. Maxwell, 190 Iowa 1308 , 181 N.W. 683 , 14 A. L.

1945In the recent case of State v. Sedig, 235 Iowa 609, 614 , 16 N. W. 2d 247, 250 , we stated: “I.

1945In the recent case of State v. Sedig, 235 Iowa 609, 614 , 16 N. W. 2d 247, 250 , we stated: “I.

1937We are giving the appellant the benefit of our own research of the record and will permit this case to fall within the rule announced in In Re Estate of Finarty, 219 Iowa 678, 680 , 259 N. W. 112, 113 , wherein we said: “The record in this case is so brief and the question at issue so. apparent that we do not feel inclined to enforce the rule.” Furthermore, the rule itself is not very plain on this phase of the matter, and apparently counsel for appellant misconstrued the rule or were not acquainted with the procedure and practice in this court in reference to referring to the page and line of

1937We are giving the appellant the benefit of our own research of the record and will permit this case to fall within the rule announced in In Re Estate of Finarty, 219 Iowa 678, 680 , 259 N. W. 112, 113 , wherein we said: “The record in this case is so brief and the question at issue so. apparent that we do not feel inclined to enforce the rule.” Furthermore, the rule itself is not very plain on this phase of the matter, and apparently counsel for appellant misconstrued the rule or were not acquainted with the procedure and practice in this court in reference to referring to the page and line of

1937In the case of Rauen v. Insurance Co., 129 Iowa 725 , at page 737, 106 N. W. 198, 202 , in considering’ a similar controversy this court said: ‘ ‘ That one who has made a written surrender of a valuable *901 right, or release of a subsisting cause of action, may repudiate the same upon sufficient showing of fraud or mistake, even where the demand thus released is disputed and unliquidated, is too well established to admit of controversy.” In the same case it is also announced: “A grossly inadequate consideration for the release of valuable rights has been held to be in itself an evidence of fr

1937In the case of Rauen v. Insurance Co., 129 Iowa 725 , at page 737, 106 N. W. 198, 202 , in considering’ a similar controversy this court said: ‘ ‘ That one who has made a written surrender of a valuable *901 right, or release of a subsisting cause of action, may repudiate the same upon sufficient showing of fraud or mistake, even where the demand thus released is disputed and unliquidated, is too well established to admit of controversy.” In the same case it is also announced: “A grossly inadequate consideration for the release of valuable rights has been held to be in itself an evidence of fr

1937In the case of Rauen v. Insurance Co., 129 Iowa 725 , at page 737, 106 N. W. 198, 202 , in considering’ a similar controversy this court said: ‘ ‘ That one who has made a written surrender of a valuable *901 right, or release of a subsisting cause of action, may repudiate the same upon sufficient showing of fraud or mistake, even where the demand thus released is disputed and unliquidated, is too well established to admit of controversy.” In the same case it is also announced: “A grossly inadequate consideration for the release of valuable rights has been held to be in itself an evidence of fr

1937In the case of Rauen v. Insurance Co., 129 Iowa 725 , at page 737, 106 N. W. 198, 202 , in considering’ a similar controversy this court said: ‘ ‘ That one who has made a written surrender of a valuable *901 right, or release of a subsisting cause of action, may repudiate the same upon sufficient showing of fraud or mistake, even where the demand thus released is disputed and unliquidated, is too well established to admit of controversy.” In the same case it is also announced: “A grossly inadequate consideration for the release of valuable rights has been held to be in itself an evidence of fr

1937In the case of Rauen v. Insurance Co., 129 Iowa 725 , at page 737, 106 N. W. 198, 202 , in considering’ a similar controversy this court said: ‘ ‘ That one who has made a written surrender of a valuable *901 right, or release of a subsisting cause of action, may repudiate the same upon sufficient showing of fraud or mistake, even where the demand thus released is disputed and unliquidated, is too well established to admit of controversy.” In the same case it is also announced: “A grossly inadequate consideration for the release of valuable rights has been held to be in itself an evidence of fr

1937In the case of Rauen v. Insurance Co., 129 Iowa 725 , at page 737, 106 N. W. 198, 202 , in considering’ a similar controversy this court said: ‘ ‘ That one who has made a written surrender of a valuable *901 right, or release of a subsisting cause of action, may repudiate the same upon sufficient showing of fraud or mistake, even where the demand thus released is disputed and unliquidated, is too well established to admit of controversy.” In the same case it is also announced: “A grossly inadequate consideration for the release of valuable rights has been held to be in itself an evidence of fr

1937In the case of Rauen v. Insurance Co., 129 Iowa 725 , at page 737, 106 N. W. 198, 202 , in considering’ a similar controversy this court said: ‘ ‘ That one who has made a written surrender of a valuable *901 right, or release of a subsisting cause of action, may repudiate the same upon sufficient showing of fraud or mistake, even where the demand thus released is disputed and unliquidated, is too well established to admit of controversy.” In the same case it is also announced: “A grossly inadequate consideration for the release of valuable rights has been held to be in itself an evidence of fr

1935Co., 239 U. S. 556 , 36 S. Ct. 188, 189 , 60 L.

1935Co., 239 U. S. 556 , 36 S. Ct. 188, 189 , 60 L.

1918That the tenant may recover damages consequent upon being denied possession to which he is entitled under the lease, was settled in this state by Adair v. Bogle, 20 Iowa 238 , and for this case, on the former appeal.