second assignment error (Connecticut) · Go Syfert
← Connecticut issues

second assignment error in Connecticut

11 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1926–2007 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (12)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Keeler neutral
conn · 1972
2 sentences

1976State v. Keeler, 164 Conn. 42, 43 .

1976State v. Keeler, 164 Conn. 42 , 43 .

21976–1976
Fleischer v. Kregelstein neutral
conn · 1962
2 sentences

1975Fleischer v. Kregelstein, 150 Conn. 158, 159 . *606 The fair hearing officer acted arbitrarily only to the extent that his decision was not based on an adequate and sufficient finding of fact.

1975Fleischer v. Kregelstein, 150 Conn. 158 , 159 . *Page 606 The fair hearing officer acted arbitrarily only to the extent that his decision was not based on an adequate and sufficient finding of fact.

21975–1975
Ohio v. Robinette green
scotus · 1996
2 sentences

2007Instead, the seizure of the defendant was extended even though the stop at its inception was justifiable only as a traffic stop and that the police had developed neither probable cause nor reasonable and articulable suspicion of criminal activity." Further, the second assignment of error in the defendant's brief sets forth the issue of "[w]hether the police violated the Connecticut [c]onstitution by converting a traffic stop into a criminal investigation in which the defendant was detained by two officers in two police vehicles and searched without justification before he `consented' to the se

2007Instead, the seizure of the defendant was extended even though the stop at its inception was justifiable only as a traffic stop and that the police had developed neither probable cause nor reasonable and articulable suspicion of criminal activity." Further, the second assignment of error in the defendant's brief sets forth the issue of "[w]hether the police violated the Connecticut [c]onstitution by converting a traffic stop into a criminal investigation in which the defendant was detained by two officers in two police vehicles and searched without justification before he `consented' to the se

12007–2007
State v. Tinsley green
conn · 1980
2 sentences

1984We note that the defendant’s brief fails to observe the procedure required by Practice Book § 3060F (c) (3). 5 While this omission could be fatal to a consideration of the error alleged; State v. Tinsley, 181 Conn. 388, 400-401 , 435 A.2d 1002 (1980); we reluctantly excuse this noncompliance.

1984We note that the defendant’s brief fails to observe the procedure required by Practice Book § 3060F (c) (3). 5 While this omission could be fatal to a consideration of the error alleged; State v. Tinsley, 181 Conn. 388, 400-401 , 435 A.2d 1002 (1980); we reluctantly excuse this noncompliance.

11984–1984
State v. McGinnis green
conn · 1969
2 sentences

1972State v. McGinnis, 158 Conn. 124, 129 , 256 A.2d 241 . *180 The defendant’s second assignment of error is that the court erred in charging the jury as follows: “Now, it is the sworn duty of Courts and jurors to safeguard the rights of persons charged with crime by respecting the presumption of innocence which the law imputes to every person so charged.

1972State v. McGinnis, 158 Conn. 124, 129 , 256 A.2d 241 . *180 The defendant’s second assignment of error is that the court erred in charging the jury as follows: “Now, it is the sworn duty of Courts and jurors to safeguard the rights of persons charged with crime by respecting the presumption of innocence which the law imputes to every person so charged.

11972–1972
Broderick v. Shea green
conn · 1956
2 sentences

1970Broderick v. Shea, 143 Conn. 590, 593 , 124 A.2d 229 .

1970Broderick v. Shea, 143 Conn. 590, 593 , 124 A.2d 229 .

11970–1970
State v. Murphy green
conn · 1938
1 sentence

1965“The denial of a motion to dismiss a criminal information has been repeatedly held to be not assignable as error.” Maltbie, Conn. App. Proc. § 212; State v. Boucher, 119 Conn. 436, 437 ; State v. Murphy, 124 Conn. 554, 567 .

11965–1965
State v. Boucher neutral
conn · 1935
1 sentence

1965“The denial of a motion to dismiss a criminal information has been repeatedly held to be not assignable as error.” Maltbie, Conn. App. Proc. § 212; State v. Boucher, 119 Conn. 436, 437 ; State v. Murphy, 124 Conn. 554, 567 .

11965–1965
Somers v. Hill green
conn · 1956
2 sentences

1956Somers v. Hill, 143 Conn. 476, 480 , 123 A.2d 468 ; Maltbie, Conn. App. Proc., § 165.

1956Somers v. Hill, 143 Conn. 476, 480 , 123 A.2d 468 ; Maltbie, Conn. App. Proc., § 165.

11956–1956
Ferrigino v. Keasbey green
conn · 1919
2 sentences

1926State v. Tripp, 84 Conn. 640, 643 , 81 Atl. 247 ; Johnson v. Cooke, 85 Conn. 679, 683 , 84 Atl. 97 ; Ferrigino v. Keasbey, 93 Conn. 445, 449 , 106 Atl. 445 .

1926State v. Tripp, 84 Conn. 640, 643 , 81 Atl. 247 ; Johnson v. Cooke, 85 Conn. 679, 683 , 84 Atl. 97 ; Ferrigino v. Keasbey, 93 Conn. 445, 449 , 106 Atl. 445 .

11926–1926
State v. Tripp neutral
conn · 1911
2 sentences

1926State v. Tripp, 84 Conn. 640, 643 , 81 Atl. 247 ; Johnson v. Cooke, 85 Conn. 679, 683 , 84 Atl. 97 ; Ferrigino v. Keasbey, 93 Conn. 445, 449 , 106 Atl. 445 .

1926State v. Tripp, 84 Conn. 640, 643 , 81 Atl. 247 ; Johnson v. Cooke, 85 Conn. 679, 683 , 84 Atl. 97 ; Ferrigino v. Keasbey, 93 Conn. 445, 449 , 106 Atl. 445 .

11926–1926
Johnson v. Cooke green
conn · 1912
2 sentences

1926State v. Tripp, 84 Conn. 640, 643 , 81 Atl. 247 ; Johnson v. Cooke, 85 Conn. 679, 683 , 84 Atl. 97 ; Ferrigino v. Keasbey, 93 Conn. 445, 449 , 106 Atl. 445 .

1926State v. Tripp, 84 Conn. 640, 643 , 81 Atl. 247 ; Johnson v. Cooke, 85 Conn. 679, 683 , 84 Atl. 97 ; Ferrigino v. Keasbey, 93 Conn. 445, 449 , 106 Atl. 445 .

11926–1926

Where else courts name it

OH 2000 (1927–2026) OR 127 (1927–2026) LA 94 (1971–2026) OK 88 (1894–2022) NE 71 (1884–2025) VA 60 (1883–2025) TX 58 (1873–2015) PA 40 (1888–1979) TN 38 (1900–1979) NC 33 (1890–2007) WV 30 (1896–2026) WA 24 (1915–2019) MO 21 (1890–2009) MS 19 (1868–1997) IN 17 (1872–1954) AZ 16 (1925–1969) GA 16 (1901–1973) AL 16 (1852–1974) FL 15 (1903–1958) KS 12 (1892–1957) CT 11 (1926–2007) CA 10 (1905–1979) ID 10 (1917–1980) CO 8 (1888–1975) MI 6 (1892–1975) PR 6 (1923–1962) IL 6 (1903–1980) MA 5 (1885–2011) IA 5 (1918–1959) NM 4 (1948–1964) KY 4 (1960–1989) AR 3 (1917–1917) SC 3 (1907–1938) RI 3 (1970–2011) NV 2 (1867–1976) NY 2 (1903–1981) MD 2 (1888–1973) MT 2 (1976–2019)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check