5 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Magic Valley Radiology, PA v. Kolouchgreen2 sentences2020Thus, Carter is judicially estopped from now pivoting 180° and arguing that the district court in the first case somehow wrongfully prevented him from adding Gateway as a party. (b) Carter’s claims in this lawsuit are repackaged arguments from the first lawsuit. 10 Claim preclusion not only applies to the same claims previously brought, but “also as to ‘every matter which might and should have been litigated in the first suit.’ ” Ticor, 144 Idaho at 126 , 157 P.3d at 620 (quoting Magic Valley Radiology, P.A. v. Kolouch, 123 Idaho 434, 437 , 849 P.2d 107, 110 (1993)). 2020Thus, Carter is judicially estopped from now pivoting 180° and arguing that the district court in the first case somehow wrongfully prevented him from adding Gateway as a party. (b) Carter’s claims in this lawsuit are repackaged arguments from the first lawsuit. 10 Claim preclusion not only applies to the same claims previously brought, but “also as to ‘every matter which might and should have been litigated in the first suit.’ ” Ticor, 144 Idaho at 126 , 157 P.3d at 620 (quoting Magic Valley Radiology, P.A. v. Kolouch, 123 Idaho 434, 437 , 849 P.2d 107, 110 (1993)). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Wadegreen2 sentences2014I.C. §§ 19-851, 19-852; I.C.R. 44; State v. Wade, 125 Idaho 522, 523 , 873 P.2d 167, 168 (Ct.App.1994). 2014I.C. §§ 19-851, 19-852; I.C.R. 44; State v. Wade, 125 Idaho 522, 523 , 873 P.2d 167, 168 (Ct.App.1994). | 1 | 1 |
Dinneen v. Finchgreen2 sentences1983(Reaffirmed in Dinneen v. Finch, 100 Idaho 620, 626-27 , 603 P.2d 575, 581-82 (1979).) The finding of the Commission that Carter failed to prove, with a reasonable degree of medical probability, that there was a causal connection between his change of condition (which resulted to total permanent disability) and the May 1976 accident, is not supported by substantial and competent evidence, and should not stand in the way of Carter’s claim. 1983(Reaffirmed in Dinneen v. Finch, 100 Idaho 620, 626-27 , 603 P.2d 575, 581-82 (1979).) The finding of the Commission that Carter failed to prove, with a reasonable degree of medical probability, that there was a causal connection between his change of condition (which resulted to total permanent disability) and the May 1976 accident, is not supported by substantial and competent evidence, and should not stand in the way of Carter’s claim. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ticor Title Co. v. Stanion
green
2 sentences2020Thus, Carter is judicially estopped from now pivoting 180° and arguing that the district court in the first case somehow wrongfully prevented him from adding Gateway as a party. (b) Carter’s claims in this lawsuit are repackaged arguments from the first lawsuit. 10 Claim preclusion not only applies to the same claims previously brought, but “also as to ‘every matter which might and should have been litigated in the first suit.’ ” Ticor, 144 Idaho at 126 , 157 P.3d at 620 (quoting Magic Valley Radiology, P.A. v. Kolouch, 123 Idaho 434, 437 , 849 P.2d 107, 110 (1993)). 2020Thus, Carter is judicially estopped from now pivoting 180° and arguing that the district court in the first case somehow wrongfully prevented him from adding Gateway as a party. (b) Carter’s claims in this lawsuit are repackaged arguments from the first lawsuit. 10 Claim preclusion not only applies to the same claims previously brought, but “also as to ‘every matter which might and should have been litigated in the first suit.’ ” Ticor, 144 Idaho at 126 , 157 P.3d at 620 (quoting Magic Valley Radiology, P.A. v. Kolouch, 123 Idaho 434, 437 , 849 P.2d 107, 110 (1993)). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Tyler Ray Carter
green
1 sentence2020Id. at 174, 307 P.3d at 191 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences1985Our analysis is also consistent with Strickland wherein the Supreme Court noted that "a verdict or conclusion only weakly supported by the record is more likely to have been affected by errors than one with overwhelming record support." 104 S.Ct. at 2069 . 1985Our analysis is also consistent with Strickland wherein the Supreme Court noted that “a verdict or conclusion only weakly supported by the record is more likely to have been affected by errors than one with overwhelming record support.” 104 S.Ct. at 2069 . | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.