Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Virginia opinions name it 1 courts 1993–2024 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Lash v. County of Henricogreen1 sentence2024See Lash v. County of Henrico, 14 Va. App. 926, 929 (1992) (en banc) (holding that Rule 5A:18 “does not prohibit reliance on statutes or cases not presented to the [circuit] court to support, on appeal, a position otherwise adequately presented” in that court). | 1 | 1 |
Hall v. Commonwealthgreen1 sentence2024See generally Hall v. Commonwealth, 14 Va. App. 892, 897 (1992) (en banc) (observing that with regard to multiple state law offenses, the statute applies only in the event of a conviction). -3- ANALYSIS The Commonwealth argues that the circuit court erred by granting Carter’s motion to dismiss the aggravated malicious wounding charge on double jeopardy grounds because he “has not already been placed in jeopardy for the same offense.” Carter contends this assignment of error is procedurally barred and also challenges it on the merits. | 1 | 1 |
Fe v. Gfmgreen1 sentence2023“Extrinsic fraud is fraud which occurs outside the judicial process and ‘consists of “conduct which prevents a fair submission of the controversy to the court.”’” F.E. v. G.F.M., 35 Va. App. 648, 659-60 (2001) (en banc) (quoting Peet, 16 Va. App. at 327 ). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Ealygreen1 sentence2023See Ealy, 12 Va. App. at 754 (declining to reach the issue of whether the defendant’s consent to search was voluntary upon holding that “the trial court properly suppressed the evidence based on the ‘fruit of the poisonous tree’ doctrine”); see also Alexandria Redevelopment & Hous. | 1 | 1 |
Carter v. City of Norfolkgreen2 sentences1998See id. at 879, 147 S.E.2d at 144 . 1998See id. at 879, 147 S.E.2d at 144 . | 1 | 1 |
Kincaid v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences1998See id. at 879, 147 S.E.2d at 144 . 1998See id. at 879, 147 S.E.2d at 144 . | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Lisa Jonesgreen1 sentence1993See Jones, 900 F.2d at 519 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Peet v. Peet
green
1 sentence2023“Extrinsic fraud is fraud which occurs outside the judicial process and ‘consists of “conduct which prevents a fair submission of the controversy to the court.”’” F.E. v. G.F.M., 35 Va. App. 648, 659-60 (2001) (en banc) (quoting Peet, 16 Va. App. at 327 ). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.